Search This Blog

Sunday 5 June 2011

Abortion: Our Own Modern Inflicted Holocaust

Below is an article from Christian voice, showing the true Horror of the Genocide of the unborn that we have witnessed since David Steel the former leader of the Liberal democrats introduced the abortion act as a private members bill in 1967, perhaps David should consider the numbers murdered if he ever wishes to falsely accuse any one in the British National Party or EDL of ever being Nazi's as we see it all true Nazi's should join the Lib Dems and for ethnic cleansing of adults perhaps the Labour party.



Christian Voice - Abortion: Our Own Holocaust: "

Our own Holocaust

That was the headline in the Sunday Telegraph on the subject of Thursday's 60th anniversary of the Russian army's entry into Auschwitz. They made a telling point - we congratulate ourselves on how much better we are than were the Nazis, but we have an extermination programme every bit as ruthless as their's was. The Nazis started off by forcibly sterilising the mentally handicapped as 'unfit to reproduce', a policy supported by British socialist intellectuals like George Bernard Shaw. They moved to exterminating those they termed 'useless eaters', using gas to kill them, and then extended the policy to other sections of society they disliked, mainly Jews. As for the disabled, 70,000 handicapped people were put to death by the summer of 1941.

In Britain today, to kill an unborn baby after 24 weeks is illegal, unless the baby is diagnosed with a handicap, which as we have recently seen, can be as trivial as a cleft palate. We compel the owners of the smallest public building to construct ramps for the disabled, whilst trying to eliminate disabled people before they are actually born. Disabled people cost money to look after, and the Nazis would have appreciated the logic of our position.

At 550 unborn babies a day, we may not be killing as fast as the Nazis managed, but we have been at it for longer. Just like they did with their extermination programme, we started by killing the hard cases, but moved quickly to extend it to those who were just inconvenient to have around. Our total death toll is now well over 6 million from abortion in the thirty-six years since it was legalised in 1968. The Sunday Telegraph concluded:

"We have successfully disguised the enormity of what we are doing from ourselves, just as the Nazis did. Thursday should not be an occasion for congratulating ourselves on how far we have come from the moral abyss of National Socialism. It should rather prompt an honest recognition of how disturbingly close our abortion laws have taken us to it."

English Defence League, Tower Hamlets Video they need all the Support We Can Muster


Below is an excellent video that has been released by the English Defence League, which is used to support an article on their site, about their intentions to remind the colonisers of Tower Hamlets London, that it is still a part of the United Kingdom. we recommend that all true Englishmen and also our Scottish, Welsh and Ulstermen brothers and sisters arrange some kind of support for this rally by either going or fund raising ! the time for trying to talk to the liberal political elites is now coming to a close in our view at the Horwich Nationalists and that we must take action ourselves to protect ourselves and our women and children not only in the future but now from the groomers and sex and rat pack attackers along with their corruption!

Saturday 4 June 2011

Join us in Bolton and Horwich and spread the word with our new national leaflet

Join us and spread the word with our new national leaflet

The British National Party is going to print with a nationwide run of our new recruitment leaflet – and we need you to help spread the word.
Our We Want Our Country Back leaflet has already returned an excellent response during its trial run of 100,000, and now it is vital we spread its message of hope as far and wide as possible.
With this recruitment campaign, we can capitalize on the ‘soft’ support we received up and down the UK in this year’s elections.
We need to let everyone know there is a real alternative to the anti-British LibLabCon monopoly – and we need to do it now.
The hard-hitting leaflet explains where we stand on pensions, British Jobs for British Workers, family values, immigration and defence, among other issues.
It also calls for an English parliament, withdrawal from the EU, and a ban on ritually slaughtered meat.
All British National Party groups and branches are invited to contact dispatch manager Alwyn Deacon at dispatch@bnp.org.uk or on 0844 809 4582 to place their orders so we can adjust our print run accordingly.
The price of the full-colour A4 leaflet is £30 per 1,000, including postage and packing.
Individual supporters are also encouraged to order leaflets for distribution.

Prices are:
50 leaflets: £2 (including P&P)
100 leaflets: £3.50 (including P&P)
250 leaflets: £8 (including P&P)
500 leaflets: £16 (including P&P)
1,000 leaflets: £30 (including P&P)
2,000 leaflets: £48 (including P&P)

Welsh, Scottish and Northern Irish versions of the leaflet are also available, but due to the economy of scale in printing, the price will be on application depending on the amount ordered.
This simple, attractive leaflet is a fantastic recruiting tool for our party – but only if enough patriotic Britons like you help us get it to as many of our countrymen as possible.
Please help do your bit for Britain, while we still have a country left to save.
You can also download the leaflet by clicking here. Print them off on your own printer at home or at work, and give them to friends and family. Also email the leaflet to everyone in your address book.
Those British National Party activists with a RISO printer, please print a master copy from the PDF and use that to print your own black-and-white versions of this leaflet.

P.S.  Another great way to help the British National Party is to set up a standing order mandate and give the price of a pint regularly. Please download the standing order mandate here: http://www.bnp.org.uk/PDF/StandingOrder_Mandate2.pdf print it of, fill it in and post it to British Heritage, PO Box 213, Wigton, Cumbria CA7 7AL.




If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

A warning to those who support the Labour Party

A warning to those who support the Labour Party
by Horwich nationalists
Below is a video and transcript of a speech given by author and scholar Robert Spencer addressed and condemning the European allies of the Marxist UK labour party , who like their UK counterparts are now are link to the forces of darkness and evil, and regularly use violence and intimidation against their opponents. Be warned the labour party is an ally of the Islamists and the enemy of Christian Western Civilisation, so consider do you wish to vote for your own enslavement by voting Labour, in a deluded wish to teach the government a lesson. You MUST! realise that all three of the major Parties are interlinked, and offer support to groups such as the UAF!

        
A demonstration for democracy, human rights and equal rights for women needs heavy police protection, as activists from the extreme left use horns, shouting and drums to silence the voices they do not agree with. Here are the words that the extremists do not want the public to hear, as author and scholar Robert Spencer addresses the unruly crowd in Stuttgart, June 2nd 2011.
The noisy crowd were wearing flags and banners from Antifa, Die Linke, SPD (German Social Democrats) and several other organisations, whose attitude to freedom of expressions apparently is quite questionable. Watch the video, see the banners and feel the noise.
Here are the words that the Antifa, Die Linke and the Social Democrats in Stuttgart do not want you to hear:

TRANSCRIPT
And now another guest:
Robert Spencer from the USA.
Robert, it is up to you to talk to the people.
I came from the United States of America to stand for freedom, with all free people, against the forces of oppression and darkness which you are representing.
I came here in order to stand with the people who are fighting for the freedoms that makes it possible for you to do what you are doing today.
Not the violence and hatred, but to stand and dissent, but you can't stand to have an (inaudible), you can't stand having dissent, you have to try to throw bottles, and to crowd us up, because you are cowards, because|you know that you stand for nothing except passion and darkness and hatred, and that is why you are there.
And that is why I am here.
You are fighting for the most radically intolerant and hateful ideology on the planet. Everywhere in the world, everywhere in the world, where there are Muslims and non-Muslims, there is conflict because the Muslims attack the non-Muslims. because unceasing they wage war against the non-believers, and they subjugate them.
You are already subjugated! You are already their useful idiots. You are already their tools. You are out here in their service. And you think your fight is for freedom. You are fighting for your own slavery! You are fighting for your own enslavement. And it will come. It will come to you.
You are fighting for an ideology that denies the freedom of speech, and one day you will wish you had the freedom of speech that you are trying to fight against today.
You are fighting for an ideology that denies the freedom of conscience
and will kill you if you disagree, which is exactly what you want to do already. You are fighting on behalf of an ideology which denies the equality of rights for women, and all the women among you will one day be enslaved, if you get what you want.
You are fighting for the destruction of all the freedoms that you enjoy. You are fighting for the (inaudible) defeat of your own selves, of your own lives. You are slaves seeking slavery. You are the oppressed loving your oppression.
And thinking that you are standing for freedom, you are the most foolish, you are the most evil, foolish, people on Earth.
We are standing for the human rights of all people. Of the oppressed Christians in Indonesia,|in Pakistan, in Egypt, in Sudan you just heard about, We are standing for the oppressed people|who are fighting the Islamic Jihad. Everywhere around the world,|in Israel, everywhere around the world.
And so, in closing, I have to say:
Shame on you!

Friday 3 June 2011

Geert Wilders : Though I stand here alone, my voice is the voice of many

By the Horwich Nationalist 


Geert Wilders gives his final address to the court in Holland defending the right of free speech and the right to criticise the Islamifaction of Holland and Europe, I hope those not involved in the struggle to regain our rights of the freedom of speech from the Marxist labour and Con/Dem parties watch this video, of the passionate and insightful address to the Dutch court, for if Geert Wilders would be found guilty at this trial the Proud nation of the Netherlands would be gone for ever with ours soon behind it!
full transcript of speech below video



Mister President, members of the Court,

I am here because of what I have said. I am here for having spoken. I have spoken, I speak and I shall continue to speak. Many have kept silent, but not Pim Fortuyn, not Theo Van Gogh, and not I.


I am obliged to speak. For the Netherlands is under threat of Islam. As I have argued many times, Islam is chiefly an ideology. An ideology of hatred, of destruction, of conquest. It is my strong conviction that Islam is a threat to Western values, to freedom of speech, to the equality of men and women, of heterosexuals and homosexuals, of believers and unbelievers.

All over the world we can see how freedom is fleeing from Islam. Day by day we see our freedoms dwindle.

Islam is opposed to freedom. Renowned scholars of Islam from all parts of the world agree on this. My witness experts subscribe to my view. There are more Islam scholars whom the court did not allow me to call upon to testify. All agree with my statements, they show that I speak the truth. That truth is on trial today.

We must live in the truth, said the dissidents under Communist rule, because the truth will set us free. Truth and freedom are inextricably connected. We must speak the truth because otherwise we shall lose our freedom.

That is why I have spoken, why I speak and why I shall continue to speak.

The statements for which I am being tried are statements which I made in my function as a politician participating in the public debate in our society. My statements were not aimed at individuals, but at Islam and the process of islamization. That is why the Public Prosecutor has concluded that I should be acquitted.

Mister President, members of the Court,

I am acting within a long tradition which I wish to honour. I am risking my life in defence of freedom in the Netherlands. Of all our achievements freedom is the most precious and the most vulnerable. Many have given their lives for freedom. We have been reminded of that in the commemorations of the month of May. But the struggle for freedom is much older.

Every day the armoured cars drive me past the statue of Johan de Witt at the Hofvijver in The Hague. De Witt wrote the “Manifesto of True Freedom” and he paid for freedom with his life. Every day I go to my office through the Binnenhof where Johan van Oldenbarneveldt was beheaded after a political trial. Leaning on his stick the elderly Oldenbarneveldt addressed his last words to his people. He said: “I have acted honourably and piously as a good patriot.” Those words are also mine.

I do not wish to betray the trust of the 1.5 million voters of my party. I do not wish to betray my country. Inspired by Johan van Oldenbarneveldt and Johan de Witt I wish to be a politician who serves the truth end hence defends the freedom of the Dutch provinces and of the Dutch people. I wish to be honest, I wish to act with honesty and that is why I wish to protect my native land against Islam. Silence is treason.

That is why I have spoken, why I speak and why I shall continue to speak.

Freedom and truth. I pay the price every day. Day and night I have to be protected against people who want to kill me. I am not complaining about it; it has been my own decision to speak. However, those who threaten me and other critics of Islam are not being tried here today. I am being tried. And about that I do complain.

I consider this trial to be a political trial. The values of D66 [a Dutch leftist liberal party] and NRC Handelsblad [a Dutch leftist newspaper] will never be brought before a judge in this country. One of the complainants clearly indicated that his intentions are political. Even questions I have asked in parliament and cooperation with the SGP are being brought as allegations against me by Mr Rabbae of GroenLinks [the leftist Dutch Green Party]. Those on the Left like to tamper with the separation of powers. When they cannot win politically because the Dutch people have discerned their sinister agenda, they try to win through the courts.

Whatever your verdict may be, that is the bitter conclusion of this trial.

This trial is also surrealistic. I am being compared with the Hutu murderers in Rwanda and with Mladic. Only a few minutes ago some here have doubted my mental health. I have been called a new Hitler. I wonder whether those who call me such names will also be sued, and if not, whether the Court will also order prosecution. Probably not. And that is just as well. Because freedom of speech applies also to my opponents.

My right to a fair trial has been violated. The order of the Amsterdam Court to prosecute me was not just a decision but a condemning verdict by judges who condemned me even before the actual trial had begun.

Mister President, members of the Court, you must now decide whether freedom still has a home in the Netherlands
Franz Kafka said: “one sees the sun slowly set, yet one is surprised when it suddenly becomes dark.”

Mister President, members of the Court, do not let the lights go out in the Netherlands.

Acquit me: Put an end to this Kafkaesque situation.

Acquit me. Political freedom requires that citizens and their elected representatives are allowed to voice opinions that are held in society.

Acquit me, for if I am convicted, you convict the freedom of opinion and expression of millions of Dutchmen.

Acquit me. I do not incite to hatred. I do not incite to discrimination. But I defend the character, the identity, the culture and the freedom of the Netherlands. That is the truth. That is why I am here. That is why I speak. That is why, like Luther before the Imperial Diet at Worms, I say: “Here I stand, I can do no other.”

That is why I have spoken, why I speak and why I shall continue to speak.

Mister President, members of the Court, though I stand here alone, my voice is the voice of many. This trial is not about me. It is about something much greater. Freedom of expression is the life source of our Western civilisation.

Do not let that source go dry just to cosy up to a totalitarian ideology. “Freedom,” said the American President Dwight Eisenhower, “has its life in the hearts, the actions, the spirit of men and so it must be daily earned and refreshed – else like a flower cut from its life-giving roots, it will wither and die.”
Mister President, members of the Court, you have a great responsibility. Do not cut freedom in the Netherlands from its roots, our freedom of expression. Acquit me. Choose freedom.

I have spoken, I speak, and it is my duty – I cannot do otherwise – to continue to speak.

Thank you. 
Geert Wilders

Education: A Radical Rethink

Education: A Radical Rethink

By Richard Barnbrook.  at http://bnpideas.com/
Just imagine for a moment, what it would be like if you could neither read nor write. The letters on this page that you are now subconsciously deciphering, would be incomprehensible!
You would also have difficulty in understanding sign posts, instructions leaflets, warning notices, correspondence, advertisements, newspapers, not to mention novels, articles, events programmes and the internet. A whole area of modern life would be to you literally, a closed book.
And yet this is the terrible impediment experienced to a greater or lesser extent by some 30,000 (about one in 20) children leaving school in Britain today. And as many as one in ten of 16 year olds (some 60,000) left school in 2005 did not pass GCSE English or Maths.
‘Education, education, education’ was a central slogan in the mantra of Tony Blair’s Nu-Labour. And yet despite throwing millions into the schools and education budget, the fact that so many children habitually under-achieve, has to be one of the most scandalous travesties of modern times.
And simply chucking good money after bad into propping up an inefficient system that is fundamentally flawed, is not the answer.
Indeed, like most of the problems which British society now has to reckon with, the rot set in largely in the 1960s.
The levelling down ‘one size fits all’ emphasis was on Comprehensive education, with large unwieldy and unruly schools in which, because of their size, individuals are just faces in the crowd. Corporal punishment in schools was abolished in Britain in 1967, and so discipline became and continues to be nothing more than a joke to bored and disruptive pupils intent on causing trouble.
But to add to this, the syllabus itself has become so prescriptive, over-burdened and progressive, that those whose learning rate is slower and who take longer to grasp the basics of a subject in the early years have virtually no hope of ever catching up.
Think what it must be like to have to sit through lessons in geometry when you haven’t grasped the concept of simple addition. Or, to broaden the analogy, classes in how to make a wedding cake when you can’t follow how to make a victoria sandwich?
I’m sure you can think of similar analogies from any field of expertise. The whole experience becomes meaningless, boring and humiliating, when one is being taught a subject at a level beyond ones comprehension. And yet this is the regular, monotonous and pointless routine for thousands of our school children, day after day and year on year.
The current school leaving age is 16, and I think that it should remain as such. Each and every child is therefore entitled to receive full time education from the age of 5- eleven years in all.
But my innovative proposition would alter the automatic progression from year to year up the school; promotion to the next class would depend wholly on whether an adequate standard is attained at the end of year assessment.
So until the child is thoroughly familiar with the standard of that year, there would be no promotion to the higher year group. For some, this would inevitably mean that their eleven years in the state education system never takes them much beyond primary school. But at least then, every child would have had every possible opportunity to enable him/her to be able to read and write fluently!
Although this proposal could be considered radical, it would as I see it, completely alter and improve the level of achievement and motivation of our children. The major milestone for all children, other than the end of year tests, would be the ‘primary examination,’ which would be at the end of what is now Key Stage 2, at age 11.
At this level, the child/young person would be able to demonstrate a comprehensive all round ability in literacy and the spoken word, numeracy, and elementary science. But in keeping with the rules of this suggested model, pupils who were not up to standard would have to resit the assessment the following year and thereafter until they attain the satisfactory standard.
Although in this day and age when so much emphasis is placed on the need to have a degree, a child that has been thoroughly taught emerges from primary school equipped with sufficient skills to make his or her way in the world.
Those who have achieved a good level at Key Stage 2 SATS can read and write fluently and are already basically numerate. In addition, they have should also covered some history (albeit there is insufficient emphasis on English History on the current syllabus) and some geography and grasped basic concepts in science.
Fluency in literacy is of course the key to education as a whole and once this has been achieved, the sky is the limit- a young person then has the option of developing his or her own skills and following his/ her own leanings in career choice, or indeed of going back into education at a later date. But a child who has not mastered the basic three Rs is in no way suited to yet more education at a higher level. No wonder there are so many disaffected truants in secondary school! For them, the experience of learning has become an agonising pain, rather than the fulfilling pleasure that it ought to be.
The implementation of such a change would cost relatively little in terms of extra money, although with mixed age ranges, more supervision would be required. But this would amount next to nothing in the grand scheme of the education budget. And it would make such a positive difference to the lives of thousands.
There are other alterations which I would advocate that would make a huge improvement to our educational achievements. Modern syllabi have become grossly unwieldy; far less ground should be covered, but it should covered more thoroughly. The vast amount of paperwork that teachers have to produce simply to prove that they are doing the job of teaching, ought to be abolished.
More emphasis should be given to learning by rote to reinforce basic principles and inculcate ‘gems of learning.’ English history should be taught as a core subject in order to instil a sense of pride and national identity. Corporal punishment should be re-introduced immediately, in order to reinstate discipline and respect for authority.
Of course, this is a universal blue-print, designed to ensure that all our children have the best chance of achieving full literacy and numeracy. However, those more able, who passed the new end of year tests, would proceed steadily up the year progression ladders as at present. The other improvements suggested above, -would apply across the board in order to improve the system as a whole.
In my view, teachers are highly undervalued. The teaching profession could be said to be perhaps the most responsible and valuable profession, second only to that of medicine. It is teachers who have the task of instructing and civilising the next generation and thereby of safeguarding this country’s future. We are happy as a society to pay hundreds of thousands of pounds in salaries to lawyers, and, as we have seen recently, to bankers and financial speculators, with little or no overall gain to the common good. But the teaching profession has been blighted because of low pay, coupled with the inability to impose discipline, both of which has resulted in a lack of respect. Consequently, it is not always easy to attract recruits of the very highest calibre.
So I would advocate raising teachers’ salaries to a basic of say £50,000 for a primary school class teacher, rising to double this for a head of department in at secondary level. We need to attract teachers of the very best ability, moral fibre and dedication and make entry into the profession as competitive and as selective as it is for law and medicine.
This strategy could be partially funded with money currently wasted on ‘nothing courses’ in colleges of further education and universities. But a country that has money to burn on pointless foreign wars surely can find the resources to properly educate its young.
We need to get back to basics and common sense in education, before another generation of non-attainers is condemned to the scrap-heap of illiteracy, disillusion and recidivism. A good thorough, basic and enabling education is a ‘pearl of great price’ and it needs to be seen and valued as such. But for many, learning is not something that one just picks up- it needs to be inculcated.
And in my view, these proposals would enable the highest standards of literacy and attainment to become the norm.

Thursday 2 June 2011

Protect Our English Churches – Email Your MP

Protect Our Churches – Email Your MP


Email your MP now telling them that it is time to Protect Our Churches and preserve Britain’s Christian heritage.
Here is an example of what you could write: IT IS QUITE SIMPLE JUST USE THE LINK AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE AND FOLLOW THE COUPLE OF  SIMPLE STEPS.

Dear [INSERT YOUR MP'S NAME],
Britain’s churches were built with the love, dedication and money of the local people.
Many sacrificed greatly to build, maintain and support their local church. There are a growing number of local Christian churches that are being converted to Islamic mosques. This is unacceptable for a number of reasons.
Many local churches contain graveyards, and in most cases the integrity of the graves where generations of our people have been laid to rest is not respected. In fact, some are even bulldozed in the most disgraceful manner.
Please could you tell me where you stand on this issue? Could you tell if you would be willing to take some sort of action to highlight this growing problem?
Yours,
[INSERT YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS]
USE THIS LINK TO EMAIL AND FILL OUT YOUR PETITION 


£400 Million of British Foreign Aid Given to India Had No Effect

£400 Million Foreign Aid Given to India Had No Effect

Hundreds of millions of pounds of British money sent to improve India’s schools has been wasted, as a governmental report reveals the country’s education standards are in fact falling.
Over the last eight years, LibLabCon governments have pumped £388 million into India’s education system and plan to spend another £117 million by 2013.
However, the Annual Status of Education Report into Indian schools revealed that much of the money has been wasted and that levels of reading, writing and arithmetic have dropped.
Standards in some regions have fallen to such an extent that national figures show up to a quarter of primary school teachers are routinely absent, half of ten-year-olds cannot read a sentence and only a third can do a simple sum.
The report, announced by Indian vice president Shri Hamid Ansari, found that the money sent by Britain has made no impact. It concluded: ‘Close scrutiny of India’s education system reveals a sobering truth – that this large investment has been spent poorly.
The highly regarded independent report found that, while there had been an increase in the number of children attending school, results are now considerably worse than those three years earlier: ‘The changes that can be discerned in the system as a whole are minor and often imperceptible,’ it read.
The news comes amid Coalition plans to enshrine in law an increase in British aid spending of over £12 billion and rising a year at a time when public services are facing sweeping cuts.
The Department for International Development (DfID) has already received criticism of its funding for India’s Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan education programme after investigations exposed corruption within the scheme, with up to £70 million going astray.
Britain is the only major country in the world set to meet an international target to spend 0.7 per cent of its annual income on foreign aid by 2014. We already contribute twice the G8 average of 0.28 per cent.
Incredibly, International Development Minister Alan Duncan defended Britain’s exorbitant foreign aid packages by saying they make Britain ‘popular’ aboard.
The Conservative minister also denounced criticism of foreign aid as ‘aid bashing’ and ‘illogical’ and employed the David Cameron trick of baseless claiming it stops immigration and terrorism.
He ridiculously tried to defend Britain’s foreign aid wastage by saying, ‘If you had a pound, would you give a halfpenny to stop someone dying in the street? The answer is you probably would, actually,’ seemingly unaware that it is not his ‘halfpenny’ that he is giving away.
India is the chief beneficiary of British aid, despite having its own space, nuclear and foreign aid programmes. It gets £295 million a year from British taxpayers.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Wednesday 1 June 2011

LYBIA : UK GOVERNMENT HYPOCRISY A PICTURE TELLS A 1000 WORDS

THEY SAY A PICTURE TELLS A 1000 WORDS, THEN WHY SAY MORE OVER THE UK GOVERNMENT SELL OUT TO THE MULTINATIONALS AND THEIR ARMS TRADE ALLIES!
Cartoons — Britain armed Gaddafi, now have designs on rebels

A Great New British National Party Newsroom Website

Horwich Nationalists are proud to announce the launch of a superb brand new website from Andrew Brons MEP of the British National Party, Named Ideas-Thoughts-Action.  
Which is a platform for British Nationalists ideas and policies, WITH MANY TRUTHFUL ARTICLES FREE FROM POLITICAL CORRECTNESS AND LEFT WING BIAS!  Also their is plenty of opportunity for members of the public to leave comments and ideas for policy. A full range policies are covered from education to foreign aid and banking plus many more ! please visit the site to see what is REALLY HAPPENING IN BRITISH POLITICS! http://bnpideas.com/