Search This Blog

Thursday 10 March 2011

Lawful Rebellion in Action March 7th 2011 Liverpool England


Lawful Rebellion in Action March 7th PDF Print E-mail

Written by Green Arrow
Tuesday, March 2011
lawful_rebellion_title_logo_120_x_83We the people hereby Serve Notice, under Common Law, to all elected politicians, of all parties in Great Britain, that failure to take action to restore the British people’s Sovereignty, and to overturn the treason and criminality that has occurred and is occurring at the highest levels in this country, will lead to charges of being personally complicit in this treason and criminality and therefore liable to prosecution under Common Law. Taken from the Lawful Rebellion site.

Hundreds of protesters stormed a courtroom and attempted to make a citizens' arrest on a judge in support of a man challenging his council tax bill.

In chaotic scenes, police rescued Judge Michael Peake from the clutches of a mob and escorted him safely from the County Court in Birkenhead, Merseyside.

Officers were force to scramble over court benches to control the near riot as one protester shouted to 'seal the court'. Another sat in the judge's chair at the head of the court and declared the defendant be released. Read rest at Daily Mail.
Pity the demonstrators were not a bit more organised as it would have been nice to hear the speech the one patriot was trying to make. But a good first effort.
If this site can do anything to promote these people then we will


Tuesday 8 March 2011

UK Muslim Poppy-Burner Fined £50 – Which Will Come Out of His Benefits

Muslim Poppy-Burner Fined £50 – Which Will Come Out of His Benefits

A Muslim fanatic has been fined a mere £50 for burning poppies and chanting hate slogans on Armistice Day.

Emdadur Choudhury, 26, was part of a demonstration by members of the so-called Muslims Against Crusaders who protested at the end of a march celebrating the UK's armed forces, on 11 November last year.Poppy-FlamesChoudhury waved a protest flag and then set fire to two large plastic poppies. He was convicted of actions "likely to cause harassment, harm or distress".

He did not even bother to attend court to hear his sentence.

Choudhury's £50 fine was means tested after his lawyer said he earned £480 a month from part-time work and got £792 a month in benefits.

The maximum fine for his offence – the least serious of public order crimes – is £1,000. Another protester, Mohammed Haque, was found not guilty.

Shaun Rusling, vice-chairman of the National Gulf War Veterans and Families Association, said that every serviceman in the country would see the sentence as "disgusting".

He said: "If we set fire to a Quran there would be uproar and they would go after us, but because this is Britain people just get upset. It is a futile sentence.

"For them to insult those who have given their lives for freedom is an affront. It is one law for them and one law for others," he said.

"Remembrance Day is a very special day for those in the armed forces. It is a day when we remember those who have lost their lives for freedom and fighting for their country."

British National Party Chairman Nick Griffin spoke for the nation when he said:

"The poppy is a symbol of generations of sacrifice by our people. The full force of the law should have come down on the heads of those who insulted that sacrifice. The petty sentence is another sign of how corrupt and out of touch the establishment is. I urge militant action against the haters who mock our nation.

"The fact that this man is on benefits means that it is the taxpayer who will be paying his fine in any case. You really couldn't make this up. What a disgrace our country has become. These fanatics will be celebrating the weakness of our establishment tonight and laughing at us and our brave service personnel. What must the lads and lasses fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan think of this?"
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of this website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

The Liberal Elite Have they learned nothing from Afghanistan?

Have they learned nothing from Afghanistan?’

– British National Party leader condemns Cameron over moves to send British troops into Libya.
Nick Griffin today launched a stinging attack on Tory leader David Cameron over the fiasco of the eight SAS troops arrested by rebels in Libya and his announcement that 600 men from the Black Watch are on standby to be sent to the strife-torn desert to help remove Colonel Gadaffi.

‘It’s beyond madness,’ said Mr. Griffin, talking to journalists in Brussels. ‘It’s up to the Libyans to decide whether they want to be ruled by an elderly kleptomaniac sex addict or by the Islamists who will emerge as the strongest force among the rebels. But either way, regime change in Libya is not worth the bones of one single British soldier or airman.

‘For Cameron to fantasise about imposing a no-fly zone on Libya while simultaneously slashing the RAF is particularly crazy. With a ConDem closure of RAF Leuchars and Kinloss, the stark reality is that the only air force David Cameron is going to destroy is Britain’s.

‘If Cameron and his American puppet-masters do invade Libya, the British National Party will immediately launch a high-profile high-street campaign to focus popular rejection of such warmongering lunacy, and against the crippling Oil Shock fuel prices that will get even worse if the US further enrages the Arab world by openly trying to steal their oil
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Monday 7 March 2011

" Apples and oranges" How the ruling party sees themselves as incorrectly unlike the British National Party

" Apples and oranges" How the ruling party sees themselves as incorrectly unlike the British National Party!

By The Alabama Rose

At the present moment I am reading a David Starkey Biography about Queen Elizabeth 1st. (one of my favorite people ever on this  earth!) it has me creating so many pictures in my mind of the land and topography of England...in reading, it so easily reminds me, even as a non indigenous person, of why the BNP exists.How magnificently and intricately the political fiber has been spun and woven into every blade of grass atop every hill and dell throughout for many thousands of years , to keep and to protect the purity and ownership of England's land and traditions for ALL of England's inherent citizens! My God! That ANY fortunate soul be born unto such a uniquely special Country, and not see the ABSOLUTE duty to do one's part to aid in whatever manner within their means to boost the fighting spirit of the home team, has no soul!!! To eat the fruits of England's land and drink from the waters that clearly run through God's blood before theirs , to walk down tree lined lanes and be free to voice your opinion of it's beauty.... To speak in your own language .... To have the gift of all of these things and yet not be willing to come to arms when ALL of the aforementioned things stand on the edge of a cliff with a strong wind at their back, is unfathomable! It is a narrow souled person who sees the BNP's sole mission to be bigotry. Even I , as an American, find it hard to believe that ALL rightful citizens( and by that I mean of course the families who have had generations of relatives go back to the beginning of time)that these citizens would not be stumbling over one another to join the heart felt and correct party of the BNP! The current prevailing parties say of the followers of the BNP ,that they stand for unethical and disrespectful practices against anyone who is not anglo..but is it not right and natural for the people who are the descendants of all the great masses of English citizens over thousands of years who fought for, died for, created , developed and maintain the current environment for themselves and ALL of the OTHERS who now enjoy the benefits without the blood sweat OR tears, is it not understandable that this group of descendants band together to strengthen their concentration in order to fight the threatening enemy who actively and aggressively seeps into all cracks and crevasses of their homeland....and has changed even the most unnoticeable detail of life as you knew it as well as the blatant
and fundamental core values you have always known? So these bully parties dare
to label the BNP yet they themselves are guilty of the same! They have banded together in likeness to fight against what THEY feel is threatening to THEM which from my perception is ANYONE who does not support THEM . They are alike with the BNP in that they have a common goal that they deem is most important above all other. Here is the difference. They have set their agenda of necessary change based on what a handful of career politicians see as important and have used their political prowess to push their personal ideas of what England should do to benefit primarily themselves ... The BNP
Is comprised of laymen and regular folks whose only " agenda" is to regain what is already rightfully theirs as citizens and have back the right to live as they choose, not as they are forced to by smaller private agendas that allow ALL OTHERS to take over everything and change the heartbeat and appearance of England while England's indigenous citizens are forced to eat the enemies dust as the foreign masses selfishly and persistently race ahead like locusts to wheat to devour anything recognizable as "English". I fail to see the BNP's banding together as a party to be any different than the banding of any other party. They must be overthrown. All the Kings and Queens and Knights and soldiers who look down from heavenly English skies must be sickened by what they see .... Take England back! Now! It is. indecent what is occurring. It must be stopped... There and in the US

Sheep Voting for Mint Sauce in Barnsley

Sheep Voting for Mint Sauce
Written by Sarah Albion   
white stick me voting labour in red ballot boxes
There are some good things to say about the result in yesterday's Barnsley bi-election, which followed the conviction and imprisonment of the previous Labour MP Eric Illsley for fiddling his expenses. The British National Party's Enis Dalton, easily beat the candidate for the Liberal Democrat part of the current government coalition and came within a mere 600 votes of beating the other government coalition candidate, the Conservative.
The bad news is that Labour won, and did so by a very comfortable majority.
One question is raised by the triumphant Labour party's impressive 60.8% share of the vote, won despite the previous Labour MP's criminality, that question is how many creatures which walk on two legs and are quite as stupid as a white, working class, Labour voter?
Extraordinarily stupid people have for centuries been the subject of, sometimes very unkind humour. Long before the cold dead hand of political correctness clasped hard on the throats and testicles of stand up comedians across the land, particular groups were often singled out as examples of those challenged in terms of intellect and common sense. Some such groups continue, to be mocked, whereas others are no longer viewed as acceptable targets.
Jokes at the expense of Irishmen have long since been consigned to the naughty step, however, interestingly, even in this feminist age jokes about Essex girls and blonds still find their way into our mailboxes from time to time, perhaps they are considered less racially sensitive than jokes about Bradford boys and brunettes.
Back in the 1980's, Sun readers became very much the butt of jokes about cerebral inadequacy and single digit IQs. There was, of course a political motive to this as the rise in “Sun Reader” jokes coincided with the point when Sun readers started to vote in large numbers for Margaret Thatcher, and the previously left leaning paper itself decided to throw its support behind the lady.
Although the underlying purpose was to undermine Thatcher's Conservative party and pillory her supporters, the official message was that it was somehow dumb for working class people to support a right wing Conservative.
To make sense of such an argument, one must believe totally in the urban myths which have become the stuff of contemporary reality.
Amongst those myths, of course, is the belief that the modern Labour party retains some vestige of loyalty to the traditional British Working class. In terms of myths this belief can only be compared to the assumption that a pack of hungry hyenas might care a jot for the well being of a wounded antelope.
In fact for Sun readers to support Thatcher demonstrated towering intellects by comparison to those amongst the white working class who still vote Labour, a group which must now stand unchallenged as the most moronic section of our community.
The Labour party may have been created to support the traditional working classes when it was formed in 1900, but that support lasted little more than 80 short years. Labour's emotional attachment to the white working class began to die with the defeat of the Atlee government in 1951, and the process was speeded up in the 1970's when, despite massive politically inspired industrial and social unrest, the downtrodden proletariat failed to embrace a socialist Utopia as the Labour script had required them to.
A shadow of the old loyalty may have lingered in the hearts of some older Labour activists at the beginning of the 1980's but that too was crushed as the defeated coal miners marched back to work in 1985.
For the last quarter of a century the Labour movement have been the sworn enemies of the white working class they were once set up to serve. The white working class failed to live up to what was expected of them and have paid a heavy price for that failure, albeit it seems a few thousand slow witted souls in Barnsley have not yet noticed that fact.
Labour have new darlings now, and none of them are white. Their interests, needs and well being conflicts entirely with the interests needs and well being of the white working class, but must at all times now take precedence over the white working class, whom most Labour activists have come to view as racist scum.
Almost every act taken by Labour over the last twenty five years, especially during their period in government have been deliberately damaging to the white working class and beneficial to Labour's new non-white, non-native favourites. This extends to almost all areas of economic, foreign and social policy. The main victims of the open door immigration policy, the embrace of the Human Rights Act, the worship of globalisation and the strengthening of outrageously one sided “equalities” legislation have been the white working classes.
It is they, the white working classes who have suffered more than any other, who have lost out in terms of earnings, employment, housing, social care and loss of their natural inheritance, they are the main victims of imported crime and the first to be replaced by an imported workforce, and it is they who have been deliberately and ruthlessly targeted by a party which cares only for a form of new multiculturalism which must, by its very nature, destroy the old culture in order to survive.
Yet they keep voting for the party which has done them so much damage and still seeks their destruction.
Why do they do it, can they really not see the truth? Are they truly all as deluded as poor old Gillian Duffy when she said to Gordon Brown “Me father, even when he was in his teens went to Free Trade Hall to sing the red flag” foolishly believing that such memories of a party so long dead would mean a thing to the cynical, Stasi minded zealot then in Downing street?
The White working class who still vote Labour are not so much turkeys voting for Christmas, after all Christmas comes just once a year. In fact they are more like sheep voting for Sunday lunch and mint sauce.
The Barnsley result shows us that there are still millions in this country who mindlessly embrace their own demise.
In answer to the question what is more stupid than a white working class Labour voter, one must admit that very little else on Earth is quite that dumb.

Thursday 3 March 2011

THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY POLICIES FOR THE PEOPLE OF HORWICH AND BOLTON IN A NUTSHELL

THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTIES POLICIES IN A NUTSHELL FOR ALL YOU HORWICH AND BOLTON PATRIOTS . WHO ARE SICK OF BEING TREATED AS SECOND CITIZENS CLASS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY!



FUTURES FREE FROM MULTI NATIONAL BANKERS AND NIGHTMARE NON BRITISH CULTURES.

So We Ask What Was the Afghan War About? as MPs Call for Talks with Taliban

So What Was the War About? MPs Call for Talks with Taliban

The House of Commons cross-parliamentary foreign affairs committee has called for direct talks with the Taliban to end the war in Afghanistan, making their original decision to go to war ten years ago into little more than an evil farce.
The announcement by foreign affairs committee chairman and Conservative MP for Croydon South, Richard Ottaway, coincided with his party’s leader David Cameron endorsing the idea of talks with the Taliban during an press conference in London.
According to Mr Ottaway and his committee, more “US engagement in talks with the Taliban is needed to bring the conflict in Afghanistan to a close” because “political reconciliation in Afghanistan could be impeded by ongoing fighting with insurgents.”
What this means in plain English is that continuing to wage war against the Taliban is preventing it from entering direct negotiations — a statement of the obvious if ever there was one.
Apart from the idiocy of this comment (befitting though it is for the current Westminster parties), its more sinister aspect is that the admission that the only solution to the conflict is to “politically reconcile” with the Taliban, raises the obvious question: why did they go to war in the first place?
The conflict in Afghanistan has cost the British taxpayer billions of pounds, hundreds of British lives and has served to incite Muslims around the world into attacking UK interests.
In other words, the war has served no useful purpose at all. Indeed, it was directly against British interests to attack Afghanistan, both at home and abroad.
Yet this same cross-parliamentary group which has now called for talks with the Taliban to “end the conflict” enthusiastically supported the war in the first place. The war, promulgated by the previous Labour regime, was supported and encouraged by the Tories, while the Liberal Democrats have, through their coalition with the Conservatives, been brought on board the warmonger bus as well.
The foreign affairs committee’s comments coincided with a visit by Afghan president Hamid Karzai to Mr Cameron in Downing Street, during which the Prime Minister genially promised that even more British taxpayers’ money would be given in aid to Afghanistan.
According to press reports, Mr Cameron also appeared enthusiastic in a joint press conference held yesterday lunchtime for more dialogue with the Taliban.
“The military campaign is only part of the equation on an Afghan-led process for reconciliation and reintegration," he told reporters.
"It is time for the Taliban to start this journey and make this year a decisive year in Afghanistan."
That comment will no doubt not be well-received by the family of the Royal Army Veterinary Corps soldier who was killed in the latest incident in Helmand province just a day ago.
The fatality brings to 358 the number of British military personnel who have died while serving in Afghanistan since the start of operations there in 2001.
The families of the dead might well now be forgiven for asking what their bitter sacrifices were now all about, if the end game is to draw the Taliban back into a “reconciled government.”
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Train Commuting Costs Set to Rise and Road Maintenance Budgets Cut Spending Review Nightmare Part III:

Spending Review Nightmare Part III: Train Commuting Costs Set to Rise and Road Maintenance Budgets Cut

Workers who commute by train on main routes with regulated fares face dramatic price increases because of the coalition government’s budget cuts, travel industry experts have warned.
The Tory/Lib Dem government has announced that it will be raising the ‘fee cap’ on routes with regulated fares to 3 percent above inflation in a bid to shift some of the cost of rail subsidies it provides onto the public — even though tax money is used to already subsidise the train companies.
The rise will hit conventional commuters the hardest, as the commuter runs are specifically those with regulated fares.
In addition, the budget cuts will “prove tough for workers in the public sector,” experts have warned.
Nigel Turner, director of programme management at travel company Carlson Wagonlit, was recently quoted in the Air and Business Travel News as warning that the budget cuts will prove a “major challenge” for the government.
He said that nobody in the public sector “has been quite sure what budget they have.
“There have been huge cutbacks already on travel, just through people not knowing what they are allowed to spend. In general, they have not been travelling.”
He said he was “hopeful” that the estimated one million job cuts, which are part of the cutbacks, would not affect the travel industry “too badly.”
It is not only the rail service which is going to cost the public more. Councils across the country have been told by Transport Minister Norman Baker that they should stop "bleating" for more funds to repair road networks.
Mr Baker, a Lib Dem MP for Lewes, admitted that the roads in his constituency were “not particularly brilliant” — an understatement considering that East Sussex County Council has an estimated backlog of 20,000 potholes to repair.
Nonetheless, Mr Baker and his colleagues have overseen a £1.5 reduction in the highways maintenance budget according to East Sussex County Council as part of the overall spending review budget cuts.
And so it goes on: While train fares rise, subsidies to train companies remain; and road maintenance budgets in Britain are cut, but the increased foreign aid budget contains millions allocated to road building in Africa.
Once again, British people are put last.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Wednesday 2 March 2011

Public Left Vulnerable as Police Cutbacks Bite:Spending Review Nightmare Part II:British National Party Analysis

Spending Review Nightmare Part II: Public Left Vulnerable as Police Cutbacks Bite

Coalition government Policing Minister Nick Herbert’s promise that the police’s front-line services would be protected after severe budgets cuts has been exposed as a lie with the news that yet another specialist unit that traces and recovers stolen cars is to be axed.
The Vehicle Crime Intelligence Service (VCIS) has been highly successful in tracking down a significant number of the 150,000 cars stolen in Britain every year, but has been told its annual £300,000 grant has been cancelled.
This money is, of course, a mere fraction of what is spent on foreign aid each year, a large portion of which goes to helping establish ‘law and order’ in other countries.
In the past four years, the VCIS has recovered more than £48 million of stolen cars, arrested more than 200 thieves and reunited thousands of car owners with their property, according to a report in Police Review magazine.
The article went on to say that the 13 police officers and seven police staff who make up the unit, called its scrapping “short-sighted” and “unjust.”
According to the Automobile Association, the service was vital. “If you can take out a gang you can wipe out a crime wave for several months, so you need this specialist police activity,” an AA spokesman was quoted as saying.
In last October’s Spending Review, it was announced that the police funding would be cut incrementally until it totalled 20 percent by 2014-15.
At the time, Mr Herbert told parliament that “front-line services could be protected while achieving challenging savings.”
This was, of course, yet another lie. It is has since emerged that police forces up and down the country will have to cut at least 10,000 active officers and thousands more other staffers will also have to be fired.
Sir Hugh Orde, president of the Association of Chief Police Officers, warned last year that police savings in back office costs and procurement would not be enough to absorb the cuts, as Mr Herbert has claimed.
“Police numbers will almost certainly have to fall once budget cuts start to bite,” Sir Hugh said.
Central funding to the police budget will fall to £9.3 billion in 2011-12, and to £8.8 billon the year after.
Compared to the billions spent on European Union membership, this figure is trifling, but, as always, the Westminster parties always put the interests of British people last.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Tuesday 1 March 2011

NHS Staff Cutbacks Despite Tory Election Promises, British National Party Analysis

Spending Review Nightmare Part I: NHS Staff Cutbacks Despite Tory Election Promises

In yet another example of how Britain was conned by David Cameron’s promise not to cut back on the National Health Service, the East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust has just announced that at least 1,000 hospital jobs, including those of doctors and nurses, are to end.
The cutbacks are a direct response to the coalition government’s Spending Review, which did not cut funding to the NHS but lowered its annual increase to 0.1 percent above inflation.
This is well under annual operating cost increases, many of which (such as the ‘carbon tax’ on emissions and the increased petrol price) are the direct result of government-imposed surcharges.
The East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust has confirmed to a local newspaper that 200 posts a year will go between now and 2015, a figure which will total a fifth of their total workforce.
According to reports, positions “facing the axe will be 257 jobs from the administration and estates department, 226 from the nursing division, 126 from therapy and diagnostics, 47 doctors, 205 clinical support staff and 13 managers.”
The Trust’s director of human resources and organisational development, Mr Ian Brandwood, admitted to a local newspaper that “some” front-line doctors’ and nurses’ posts would go.
The announcement confirmed the accuracy of the earlier report this week by anti-cuts activist organisation, False Economy, which specifically said that the East Lancashire NHS Trust would soon get right of 1,013 full-time equivalent staff, 50 doctors and dental staff, and 270 nurses, midwives and health visitors.
The budget restrictions will impact more than 50,000 hospital posts nationwide as NHS Trusts struggle to meet the government’s demand of £20 billion of “efficiency savings” over the next five years.
The “savings” mean that the NHS has to trim £4 billion off its expenses each year — a figure which is less than the annual estimated £4.5 billion spent each year fighting the war in Afghanistan.
Once again, the Westminster parties clearly think that fighting an unwinnable war which causes terrorism, is more important that funding healthcare for British people.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.