Search This Blog

Sunday 20 February 2011

heartless and lack compassion ?

Heartless and Lack of Compassion?
by Horwich Nationalists
What I have to say may seem heartless and lack compassion towards PC David Rathband was left blind after being shot by Raoul Moat.Of course I have sympathy as a human being towards this man as a fellow human being, BUT as policeman I have no sympathy what so ever with him!a contradiction you may ask?

Raoul Moat
But this man has taken the pay of the evil Liberal Marxist political elite, in order to enforce the laws that have been made by that same Liberal Marxist elite in order to subjugate and destroy the indigenous population of this country, and is therefore just as guilty of the charge of ethnic and national treason towards the indigenous peoples of this nation as they are!

The claim or in my opinion the excuse of a career serving the British public can no longer hold sway for the indigenous men and Women whom join the UK police . To me it now seems clear that those men and women now entering the Police service are fully aware as are the majority of the white and blue collar working classes, how the Laws of this land are now clearly established in order to subjugate themselves and their fellow native population of these Islands.

I believe that those who join the police are only concerned about their own financial prospects plus secure employment with retirement benefits. And that whom their serve or subjugate is of only minor if any consideration. As as been proved to some extent by the latest news that the officer PC David Rathband  shot by Raoul Moat is to sue for compensation for the sum of £1 million 
despite still being employed by the Police force and hoping for promotion that will lead to better financial rewards.
Now consider that against what our brave soldiers who serve for love of nation and people get after returning from Afghanistan, basically nothing but spit on by Muslim so called medical staff and their Respect Party brethren and an email saying F**k Off! you are surplus to requirements, and by the way here's £1500 and some sub standard paraplegic equipment, make do! see my point! but remember if it was in my power I would give PC David Rathband his eyesight back tomorrow for  do not hate the man but the institutions of evil he had chosen to support!

LOOK! Nick Griffin Bolton's MEP and Andrew Brons MEP on EU hypocrisy

Nick Griffin MEP and Andrew Brons MEP on EU hypocrisy PDF Print E-mail
Written by Green Arrow   
February 2011
bnplogonew_120_x_97Cracking video here of Nick Griffin MEP speaking to Andrew Brons MEP about the hypocrisy of the European Union and I must confess that whilst sometimes I have the attention span of a gold fish this clip had me riveted.
I just wish the British National Party MEP's were given a chance like this to speak on British Television without being interrupted or ambushed and it is great to see Andrew restored to health and doing his bit.  Enjoy the video. I did.

Residents of Horwich and Bolton are you Passionate about Britain ? — A Message from Nick Griffin

Passionate about Britain — A Message from Nick Griffin

Monday was Valentine's Day. It got me thinking about love, in different forms, and how we express it. We love our family and our friends of course.
 The more religious amongst us love God. There are different types of love — all covered by just that one word.
You, like me, don't just love your friends and family. You love and care about your country.
Maybe this week you sent a card or a message of love.
The British National Party has a message for Britain. It's a message of hope. It's also a message of love.

   
We have produced a stunning new leaflet which is positive and professional and gets this message over.
This leaflet is the next step in the campaign to make sure that people understand that we do what we do because we care. Our new "Heart for Britain" logo was just the start.
Our leaflet goes beyond our complaints on key issues like immigration. It tackles other questions of vital concern to the public.
Everyone who cares about the future of our country needs to get hold of some of these leaflets.
Every person who believes our country can be a land we can be proud of again needs to donate so that we can print even more.
   

On the first day of release, our leaflet sold 200,000 copies. They will be going through doors up and down the land now.
It's not enough! Our message needs to get to everyone!
That's a big job, and we will need your help. Everyone can play a part.
You can help in two ways.
First, order some leaflets yourself.

Call 0844 809 4582 to place your order now. You can pay with credit card or make cheques or postal orders payable to ‘British Heritage’ and send them to PO Box 5057, Nuneaton, CV11 9FP.
Prices:
*  100 = £5
*  250 = £9
*  500 = £17.50
*  1,000 = £30
*  4,000 = £100
We're passionate about our country – let's get others feeling the same way!
Second, donate online, or by ringing 0844 809 4581, so that we can get even more copies into the hands of our activists. Some are unemployed, some are pensioners, some are still at school – if you can't do the legwork with them, can you at least keep them supplied with leaflets?
Please accept my sincere thanks,
Nick Griffin
Member of the European Parliament
P.S. Help us get people to understand that supporters of the British National Party care about our country. Britain is our heartland, and we are passionate about it. Order our great new leaflet. You can also donate online, or by ringing 0844 8094582, to get even more printed. Remember, if our operators are busy, please call back!
   
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of this website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Saturday 19 February 2011

David Cameron’s “Big Society” Nonsense Fails Big Time in Liverpool

“Big Society” Nonsense Fails Big Time in Liverpool

One of David Cameron’s largest ‘Big Society’ projects — in Liverpool — has collapsed after the inherent contradiction between budget cuts and “increased support for community groups” dawned upon the scheme’s promoters.
According to reports, the ‘Big Society’ project in Liverpool was meant to support community groups and charities “central to the government’s vision” as mapped out in its nonsensical election manifesto.
The ‘Big Society’ scam in Liverpool hooked in local television producer Phil Redmond as its well-meaning frontman in order to try and sell the scheme to Liverpool Council and the public.
However, Mr Redmond has now washed his hands of the scheme, according to local media reports.
“The project has made little progress amid funding cuts,” Mr Redmond gave as his reason for quitting.
This opinion was confirmed by Sir Stephen Bubb, chief executive of the Association of Chief Executives of Voluntary Organisations, who told the media that the ‘Big Society Network,’ set up by the government to support community organisers, is “imploding internally.
“Some of the apparatus they had set up to promote this idea is falling apart,” Sir Stephen said.
“Ministers should be protecting and using the existing voluntary sector, ensuring cuts didn’t fall disproportionately on charities.
“What this shows is you can’t drive development through diktats from Westminster. The vanguards were devised in London as showcase projects; they weren’t things that grew from within the sector,” he added.
Even if the ‘Big Society’ was actually real and not some half-baked fantasy drivel invented by David Cameron to divert attention away from this political bankruptcy, the savage spending cuts announced by the ConDem regime will make any further handouts impossible — just as Liverpool Council has discovered.
The council announced last week that it was to axe 1,500 jobs as part of a drive to save £141 million by 2013, and third sector umbrella body Liverpool Charity and Voluntary Services is losing two-thirds of its jobs to cope with an expected £800,000 cut in its £1.2 million budget for the coming financial year.
This news came after it was revealed that the Government’s ‘Big Society adviser', Chinese-origin Nat Wei, had found it impossible to continue in his role because he had not been paid.

Unemployment in Bolton and Nationally soars in the past month

Unemployment in Bolton has soared in the past month, new figures show.
Labour market statistics released today show the number of people claiming unemployment benefits in the borough jumped in January to 7,601, from 7,133 the previous month.
That means the rate of unemployment in Bolton has jumped from 4.2 per cent to 4.5 per cent.
However, the figure is still lower than this time last year when the number of people out of work in the town stood at more than 8,600.
In the North West, only Manchester, Liverpool , Wigan, Sefton and Wirral have a higher number of people out of work, whilst at the same time as reported by the British National Party news team in Horwich and Bolton

Unemployment rose by 44,000 to nearly 2.5 million in the last three months of 2010 nationally , according to the latest report from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) — while other figures showed that there are now over one million illegal immigrants, and hundreds of thousands of “asylum seekers” in Britain.
To add insult to injury, the ConDem regime’s ‘immigration cap’ specifically excludes ‘tens of thousands’ of migrants, EU workers and a free trade deal with India will allow in thousands of Indian workers over and above any other immigration figures.
According to the ONS figures, one of the biggest increases was in youth unemployment, with one in five 16 to 24-year-olds now out of work. The overall unemployment rate has risen to 7.9 percent and the number of people claiming Jobseeker's Allowance also rose by 2,400 to 1.46 million in January.
In April 2010, a MigrationWatch UK report said that there are more than one million illegal immigrants in Britain and that the number of visa overstayers is increasing by at least 60,000 per year. This is because the last Tory government abolished all exit controls at British airports and ports.
The number of asylum seekers runs at anywhere between 30,000 and 60,000 per year, with more than 92 percent of them being allowed to stay even if their asylum applications are rejected.
Meanwhile, all foreigners earning more than £150,000 a year will be exempt from the ‘immigration cap’ hoax, it was announced this week.
The supposed cap, which is to come into force in April, will not affect any migrant worker already in the UK even if they change jobs or visas.
Companies will also still be able to bring in overseas staff who earn less than a planned salary cap so long as they rotate them each year.
Around 36,000 'skilled' workers arrived in the UK last year alone.
The total disregard for young British people in favour of outsiders has become a hallmark of the Westminster parties.
Other ONS figures released earlier this week showed that 20 percent of all new graduates in Britain have been unable to find work and have had to resort to dole money to live.
The figures also showed that 45 percent of 16 to 17-year-old school leavers ready for work, were also unable to find a job.
For new graduates, the unemployment rate has doubled since the start of the recession to 20 percent in the third quarter of last year. It is now at its highest for more than a decade.
The jobless rate among graduates has jumped by 6.3 percent compared with 5.3 percent for those without a degree.
Despite this, the Government has agreed to participate in a scheme to allow thousands of Indian IT and other workers free access to Britain’s job market in terms of an EU free trade deal with India.
This free trade agreement was piloted through all of its major stages by the previous Labour government in the form of Peter Mandelson, and has been endorsed by the Conservative/Lib-Dem coalition.
Once again, the establishment parties have all activley colluded to put the British people last.

Trafalgar Tourist Terror What Are Kosovan Street Gangs Doing in London?

What Are Kosovan Street Gangs Doing in London?

Thursday’s mass brawl between rival Kosovan street gangs in the middle of London’s Trafalgar Square has once again illustrated the insanity of the establishment parties’ asylum policy.
According to reports, “shocked tourists” were witness to the violent gang fight which saw at least three Kosovans hospitalised and another 19 arrested.
The Kosovans, armed with knives and hockey sticks, fought pitched battles with each other and police for around 90 minutes, apparently after going to the Square to “celebrate” Kosovo’s National Day.
The controlled media has tried to portray the mass fight as part of London’s “knife crime problem.”
While it is true that most of the capital city’s knife crime is of immigrant origin, the Kosovan street gangs are an end-product of a much more sinister aspect of government asylum policy.
Kosovo used to be part of Yugoslavia until the end of the Communist era when it broke up into would-be ethnic states.
Kosovo is currently under the administration of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (EULEX), despite its independence being recognised by 75 UN member states.
However, Kosovo is not formally part of the EU, and as such Kosovans do not have automatic right of residence in Britain.
Nonetheless, Kosovans were granted special privileges when applying for asylum in Britain as a result of the war in the former Yugoslavia.
As a result, at least 1,000 Kosovans applied every month to come to Britain under the asylum rules, which were only tightened up after widespread abuse of the system became apparent.
There are no publicly available figures on the number of Kosovan “asylum seekers” now living in Britain, but there are certainly enough to have imported their gang warfare onto the most famous square in all London.
* It is also no coincidence that 90 percent of Kosovans follow the Islamic faith. This could also explain the special privileges granted to them by the establishment parties.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Friday 18 February 2011

UK Unemployment Rockets but 1 Million Illegal Immigrants and ‘Tens of Thousands’ to Avoid Annual Cap


2.5 Million Unemployed, but 1 Million Illegal Immigrants and ‘Tens of Thousands’ to Avoid Annual Cap

Unemployment rose by 44,000 to nearly 2.5 million in the last three months of 2010, according to the latest report from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) — while other figures showed that there are now over one million illegal immigrants, and hundreds of thousands of “asylum seekers” in Britain.
To add insult to injury, the ConDem regime’s ‘immigration cap’ specifically excludes ‘tens of thousands’ of migrants, EU workers and a free trade deal with India will allow in thousands of Indian workers over and above any other immigration figures.
According to the ONS figures, one of the biggest increases was in youth unemployment, with one in five 16 to 24-year-olds now out of work. The overall unemployment rate has risen to 7.9 percent and the number of people claiming Jobseeker's Allowance also rose by 2,400 to 1.46 million in January.
In April 2010, a MigrationWatch UK report said that there are more than one million illegal immigrants in Britain and that the number of visa overstayers is increasing by at least 60,000 per year. This is because the last Tory government abolished all exit controls at British airports and ports.
The number of asylum seekers runs at anywhere between 30,000 and 60,000 per year, with more than 92 percent of them being allowed to stay even if their asylum applications are rejected.
Meanwhile, all foreigners earning more than £150,000 a year will be exempt from the ‘immigration cap’ hoax, it was announced this week.
The supposed cap, which is to come into force in April, will not affect any migrant worker already in the UK even if they change jobs or visas.
Companies will also still be able to bring in overseas staff who earn less than a planned salary cap so long as they rotate them each year.
Around 36,000 'skilled' workers arrived in the UK last year alone.
The total disregard for young British people in favour of outsiders has become a hallmark of the Westminster parties.
Other ONS figures released earlier this week showed that 20 percent of all new graduates in Britain have been unable to find work and have had to resort to dole money to live.
The figures also showed that 45 percent of 16 to 17-year-old school leavers ready for work, were also unable to find a job.
For new graduates, the unemployment rate has doubled since the start of the recession to 20 percent in the third quarter of last year. It is now at its highest for more than a decade.
The jobless rate among graduates has jumped by 6.3 percent compared with 5.3 percent for those without a degree.
Despite this, the Government has agreed to participate in a scheme to allow thousands of Indian IT and other workers free access to Britain’s job market in terms of an EU free trade deal with India.
This free trade agreement was piloted through all of its major stages by the previous Labour government in the form of Peter Mandelson, and has been endorsed by the Conservative/Lib-Dem coalition.
Once again, the establishment parties have all activley colluded to put the British people last.

Cameron’s “Big Society”: The Greatest Piece of Garbage Ever to Appear in Bolton and British Politics

Cameron’s “Big Society”: The Single Greatest Piece of Rubbish Ever to Appear in British Politics

David Cameron’s “big society” is the single greatest piece of rubbish ever to appear in British politics and consists of a collection of meaningless and unimplementable statements, costly and unimplemented undertakings and one outright lie.
A British National Party study group analysis of the Conservative Party’s 2010 election manifesto’s section on the ‘big society’ has revealed it to be a hotchpotch of utterly vague nonsense, deliberately designed to “sound” good but which completely lacks any substance.
The analysis showed that of the 16 major pledges contained in the Conservative Party’s manifesto ‘big society’ section, most are nonsensical sound bites which have no substance to them.
For example, the first claim in the Tory manifesto was that the 'big society' would “stimulate social action.”
No attempt was made to define this “social action” and it was deliberately left open-ended, most likely because the author (allegedly Mr Cameron himself) had no idea what was meant either.
The second claim in the Tory manifesto was a promise to help “social enterprises to deliver public services.”
This is equally meaningless, as “social enterprises” are also not defined. Even if they were, the very concept of outside non-government agencies delivering public services is an oxymoron in itself.
The third point in the Conservative manifesto was a promise to train “new community organisers to help achieve our ambition of every adult citizen being a member of an active neighbourhood group.”
Apart from the fact that absolutely nothing has been done in this regard, it is extremely far-fetched to claim that every adult citizen is going to be become a member of an “active neighbourhood group,” whatever that might mean.
The Tory manifesto did not stop there. It went on to claim as the big society’s fourth point that it would “direct funding to those groups that strengthen communities in deprived areas.”
What this statement says is that groups which “strengthen” communities in deprived areas are currently not being funded, which is, of course, pure nonsense.
There are already hardly any recognised ‘community organisations’ in ‘deprived areas’ which are not already funded. Indeed, in Third World immigrant-dominated ‘deprived’ areas, all the evidence indicates that they are overfunded to the detriment of the indigenous population.
Mr Cameron’s manifesto went on to say as its ninth point that the ‘big society’ would create “much higher levels of personal, professional, civic and corporate responsibility.”
Once again, that sounds good and well, but in reality this ‘point’ is meaningless, as a clear-minded reading of it reveals.
Other meaningless ‘promises’ made in the Tory’s ‘big society’ manifesto include the following examples of intellectual shallowness:
- The creation of a “society where people come together to solve problems and improve life for themselves and their communities.”
- The transformation of the “civil service into a ‘civic service’ by making sure that participation in social action is recognised in civil servants’ appraisals.”
- The launching of an “annual Big Society Day to celebrate the work of neighbourhood groups.”
- The development of “a measure of well-being that encapsulates the social value of state action.”
- A promise to “introduce new ways to increase philanthropy.”
As laughably transparent as this nonsense is, at least it is relatively harmless in comparison to the three ‘big society’ promises which have come remotely near to fruition.
The first of these, a pledge to introduce a “National Citizen Service to help bring our country together,” is scheduled for implementation this coming summer.
It is still not been revealed how this programme (which will see millions and millions of kids called up, housed and fed) will be financed, given the extent of the budget cuts currently being implemented across the board.
The second of the pledges nearing fulfilment is the promise to “redistribute power from the state to society.”
This is the purpose behind the Decentralisation and Localism Bill, one of whose most important elements (the simplification of planning applications appeals process) will have the exact opposite consequence for local people.
The third pledge which is on the point of fruition is the creation of a “Big Society Bank” funded from “unclaimed bank assets” to provide “new finance for neighbourhood groups, charities, social enterprises and other nongovernmental bodies.”
According to a statement released by the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) this month, loans from the “Big Society Bank” will be too expensive for many charities and social enterprises and therefore unusable.
The CAF said that if the bank operates on a commercial basis from the outset then there is “a risk that it will not let charities and social enterprises access affordable capital.”
Emilie Goodall, senior investment manager at CAF Venturesome, CAF’s social investment fund, said that the “emphasis of the Big Society Bank on helping charities and social enterprises to deliver public services may also exclude the bulk of the sector as most don’t do this but they still need access to capital. The result could be that the Bank doesn’t generate the wide-ranging positive impact that the government and the sector wants and needs.”
Another of the ‘big society’ claims which is unimplemented nine months later is the promise to “restore the National Lottery to its original purpose and, by cutting down on administration costs, make sure more money goes to good causes.”
There has been no indication anywhere that this has been done, or that it is even in the pipeline.
Finally, the most outrageous lie was kept for last. In the Tory ‘big society’ manifesto discussion on the promotion of sport, the Conservatives promised they would “deliver a successful Olympics that brings lasting benefits for the country as a whole.”
The winning London Olympic bid had nothing at all to do with any political party, and it is yet another indication of the gall and lies of the Conservative Party to claim this for themselves.
Mr Cameron’s ‘big society’ is a verbal hoax, vomited up again and again in the wasteland of meaningless noise which is the controlled media.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party  website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Thursday 17 February 2011

The Joy of Teen Sex: Why we weep for our British young people

The Joy of Teen Sex: Why we weep for our young people

With Ofcom failing to act, the public must speak out against television programmes like C4's The Joy of Teen Sex which actively promote risky sexual behaviour

The Joy of Teen Sex: Why we weep for our young people
Miranda Suit
Full Size [+]
Channel 4’s series, The Joy of Teen Sex (JTS) has taken television to new depths of sexual explicitness by encouraging teenagers to be filmed attending their “frank and honest” Sex Advice Shop for help with their most intimate sexual worries.
C4 warned JTS would include “graphic sex and full frontal nudity”, but what follows is far worse: an arousing cocktail of graphic displays of sexual anatomy and sexual positions (heterosexual, homosexual and lesbian), followed by pornographic demonstrations by actors who look like teenagers themselves.
The three disarming young female presenters - a doctor, social worker (not yet qualified) and sex coach (actually a sex-toy saleswoman) - advise us, “While we think you should wait until at least 16 before losing your virginity, we can’t pretend teen sex is not happening, we should embrace it and face it head on.”
The teenagers are encouraged to ‘improve their sex lives’ with advice on oral and anal sex, genital plastic surgery and piercing (we saw one lad having a ring inserted in his penis), S&M, sex toys, ‘sex-enhancing’ drugs and working in the sex industry. No mention of avoiding promiscuous relationships, just instructions to use condoms for so-called ‘protection’ against STIs and pregnancy. Oral sex is portrayed in an exceptionally positive light despite recent research showing a link with mouth cancer. Advice on anal sex focuses on making it less painful as opposed to warning of the serious health risks.
This promotion of risky behaviour is absolutely unacceptable and potentially dangerous to young people’s health. It is the very opposite of ‘training a child in the way he should go.’ (Proverbs 22:6).
Having impressionable teenagers on screen exposing themselves physically and emotionally, exploits them for entertainment. How will they be affected in the future? How has C4 prepared them psychologically, and what follow up support will they receive?
In the UK, where we have some of the highest rates of teen pregnancy, abortion and STIs in Europe, our media’s obsession with values-free sex and nudity contributes to the problem. A report by the University of North Carolina found that “sexually charged music, magazines, TV and movies push youngsters into intercourse at an earlier age … the more kids are exposed to sex in the media, the earlier they have sex.” JTS takes this a step further by directly coaching young people in risky sexual behaviour.
Safermedia is especially concerned about the children who watched JTS unbeknown to their parents. The watershed offers scant protection to the majority of youngsters with televisions, computers, mobile phones, games consoles, etc. in their bedrooms. Many parents feel unable to use parental controls or monitor their children’s viewing; or they are too busy or indifferent. Many children circumvent controls with ease.
Amid growing public concern and the Government’s new independent Review on the Sexualisation of Childhood, C4’s behaviour is particularly irresponsible and needs to be challenged. Clearly the ‘light touch’ approach by UK regulator Ofcom is not working, as C4 have felt bold enough to broadcast such material, and Ofcom have taken no action against them so far. Public protest is therefore vital.
Twenty-three health and education professionals and bodies have already written to C4 about what they claim is the lack of qualified professionals on the show, poor advice and inaccurate and misleading information. We must all speak out ever more strongly and let Ofcom know that in no way does JTS meet with “acceptable community standards” (E: contact@ofcom.org.uk). C4 must be held to account even if retrospectively because this heralds the mainstreaming of pornography on television via the internet.
Several Safermedia supporters were reduced to tears by the programme, overcome by desperation and anger at such a betrayal of trust towards our younger generation. (Matthew 18:6). We hope and pray that our tears for the next generation will not be in vain.
Miranda Suit is Co Chairman of Safermedia, a charity seeking to reduce the harmful effects of the media on our children, families and society www.safermedia.org.uk

More Percived Benefits of Diversity

More Benefits of Diversity PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sarah Albion   
RBS Logo
I see that China, a country which is famously a net exporter of immigrants, has become the second largest economy rapidly catching up on America, a nation now drowning in debt and immigration. Meanwhile, the immigrant friendly UK has plummeted from fourth place to sixth in the world ranking and is still falling. At the same time, India, a country which is probably the greatest net exporter of immigrants on the planet, whilst fiercely restricting inward migration, has risen to 11th place rivalling both Russia and Canada for a place in the top 10.
Despite this we are forever told that that immigration benefits our economies and our national well being. Yet, those who make such claims tend to be less explicit when asked to substantiate or quantify their assertions.
This is hardly surprising, for as Britain struggles to recover from the worst recession in our history, and one which hit us following a decade of inward immigration at levels unseen in any European country in history, is it not legitimate to ask where exactly is this much vaunted benefit.
Inward migration to both China and India is all but non-existent, yet while our economies are in free fall their economies are soaring.
By comparison, both Greece and Ireland the two earliest casualties (so far) of the so called global economic crisis, both experienced massive levels of inward immigration, before the whole thing fell apart.  This same story is being repeated throughout Europe and North America.  With the single exception of Germany, we are all in a state of rapid economic decline, despite enthusiastically importing the mass I which was supposed to be out salvation.
“We all benefit from our vibrant m society” the great and the good keep telling us, “Divesity is our strength”  but the evidence supporting this claims becomes less credible by the day.
It is not only countries which are suffering the consequences of this delusion, it is also not doing corporations much good either.
Two of the largest casualties of the 2008 economic collapse were A, which required a bailout from the US government eventually totalling $150 billion and RBS which ended up 60% owned by the UK taxpayers,  Previously both companies appeared to be booming, however, I would  draw your attention to these two new stories which appeared in the three years leading up to the crisis:
Makes you think doesn’t it?  Diversity is our strength huh? I think not.
______________________