Search This Blog

Saturday 1 May 2010

Our American Cousin and BNP Member - John Charles Bush

Why this American became a member of the BNP

Our American Cousin and BNP Member - John Charles Bush
I remember the day well in August of 2009 when the US news media reported that many so called "right wing" parties had done well in the EU elections. This suddenly aroused my curiosity as I turned the volume up on my TV to hear the news. Suddenly a man appeared that I had never seen or heard of named Nick Griffin. He was standing at a podium giving a "Victory" speech . The media immediately said that the voters were fed up with the ruling Labour Party and had decided to make  change for the BNP.

Well I had also never heard of the BNP so I turned off the TV and went to my computer where I knew I could get better info from the internet. I simply typed in BNP and their website came up on the info page. It was an astoundingly professional looking site! The Union Flag was all over the front page. All of the articles were very well written and easily understandable. My curiosity turned to fascination as I read more and more. As I looked through the site I came across a BNP chatroom and I decided to go in and speak.

I was a little nervous being an American and I didn't know if I would be welcomed. Every person in that room turned out to be very nice and I immediately felt an attachment brewing. These are my kinds of people I thought! They were all interested in knowing a few things about the US as well as the state where I live which is Kentucky. Very few of them knew much about Kentucky other than KFC and I knew very little about the UK other than the Beatles. The chatroom became an interesting place to exchange our cultures as I returned night after night.

One day I asked a BNP member if Americans were allowed to join. He told me absolutely and that I should do so at my nearest convenience.  Well to make a short story shorter I joined that very moment and my membership card arrived a few weeks later. I am so proud to carry it in my wallet. My family came from Britain to America many years ago so I feel a very strong attachment to the BNP because it is so traditionally British.

When I think of Britain I think of the Union Flag as well as the English. The other parties don't even look British judging by their looks and advertising. You would think they were from some other country if you didn't know better. However, one can just take a simple first glimpse of the BNP and know they are British.

This is the sole reason I joined the BNP.

FOOTNOTE HORWICH NATIONALISTS
THEIR IS GREAT SUPPORT TO BE GOT  FROM OUR AMERICAN BRETHREN  WHO HAVE SIMILAR PROBLEMS TO OUR OWN WITH MUSLIMS AND A OUT OF TOUCH LIBERAL POLITICAL ELITE, HELP THEM IN THEIR STRUGGLE ALSO AND I AM SURE ALL KINDS OF SUPPORT WILL WING IT,S WAY TO THE BNP.

Labour party tricks in Horwich reach New Low


Press Statement

Ivan Cooper
British National Party Candidate
Horwich North East 


1/05/2010
The Labour party have sunk to a new low by publishing a website & circulated document that is allowing a group called the Trafford 60+ Action Group to interfere in the democratic political process, by attacking the Conservative Parliamentary candidate with nothing more than what can be described as a character assassination of the Bolton West Conservative party candidate Susan Williams.

Not only is this group publishing it,s character assination  of Mrs Williams on the web but it is also circulation sealed hand addressed letters to residents in Horwich ( I received one through my door 1/5/2010 15.00pm). a copy of which is available on the above website,  published by Gary Titley Labour party member on behalf of Julie Hilling 108 Market st Westhoughton Bolton.

This is not the first time the Labour party has used outside parties to try and influence the democratic process, we in the British National Party have had to contend with the Trade Union &; Daily Mirror backed leafleting campaign by the Marxist group Searchlight both affiliated closely to the Labour Party, whom I allege have direct prior knowledge of these unethical campaigns against their opponents   

I therefore demand that the Bolton Labour Party stop using second parties to fight it,s campaigns and to stop using dishonest methods and smear tactics about other candidates or parties who oppose them in Democratic election, and to enter into the honest democratic process without having to resort to the violence of the Marxist UAF or the Smears of the likewise Marxist Searchlight organisations , and also the Labour Party apologise to Mrs Williams as I as the British National candidate for Horwich North East  party strongly condemn these underhand tactics.

End Statement


Immigration control staff at Dover are to be made redundant because of “budget cuts”

May 1, 2010 - By BNP News
All senior immigration control staff at Dover are to be made redundant because of “budget cuts” of £1.5 million — while the foreign aid budget is to be increased to £13.1 billion.
According to reports, all 24 UK Border Agency (UKBA) staff in Dover with the title immigration officer (the nation’s front line in immigration control) will lose their jobs.
These particular staff members are allegedly responsible for 40 percent of all the illegal immigrant removals from Kent last year.
The budget cuts will also cause the closure of the Dover detention centre which means that illegal immigrants in the region will now no longer even be held under state custody prior to being ‘deported’.
According to a leaked memo, regional UKBA deputy director Graham Ralph wrote: “The budget for Kent – including Dover, will be reduced by £1.5 million annually.
“This is a difficult and uncertain time for everyone. I urge staff to work together to get through this restructure.”
Meanwhile, the Government has announced plans for the foreign aid budget to be increased to 0.7 percent of the Gross Domestic Product. This will translate to a figure in excess of £13 billion.
According to the memo, two chief immigration officers will also be sacked and assistant officers will decrease from 23 to 21. Further cuts in nearby Folkestone take the job losses to 30.
Both Labour and Conservatives have promised across-the-board cuts in all public sectors, but both have “ring fenced” foreign aid as untouchable.
Other cuts will see at least 100,000 job losses in the National Health  Service, and an estimated 500,000 job losses elsewhere in the public sector.
The catastrophic after effects of these job losses will reverberate throughout the economy as a large number of private sector companies depend on public service contracts for their existence.
The increase in the foreign aid budget becomes even more scandalous in this light.
It seems there is money for foreign aid to China, but not to protect Britain’s borders.
The British National Party is the only political party to demand an end to foreign aid and the large number of other unnecessary handouts (‘climate change’, EU membership, foreign wars, immigration, asylum and all politically correct leftist projects).
The savings generated by cutting these projects will allow a BNP government to keep front line expenditure at the proper levels, without tax raises or other punitive measures.

Applause for BNP as other parties lose the plot!

There was noticeable apprehension from Conservative and Labour parliamentary candidates at a hustings in Broxbourne, Hertfordshire this week. Broxbourne Tory MP Charles Walker swore he would never share a platform with the BNP, but this week he had no choice. BNP candidate and sub-regional organiser Steve McCole stole the show with his quiet dignity and common sense approach, giving Walker serious cause for concern. The shallow policies of both Tory and Labour brought forth derision from a large and energetic crowd.

An illegal immigrant has been canvassing For Labour’s Salford MP Hazel Blears

May 1, 2010 - By BNP News
An illegal immigrant has been canvassing for Labour’s Salford MP and former Cabinet minister Hazel Blears against the British National Party’s Tina Wingfield, it has emerged.
Nigerian Rhoda Sulaimon came to Britain on a student visa five years ago. Because the Tory and Labour parties scrapped any cross checking on who leaves Britain, the Nigerian simply stayed on.
She then proceeded to have a child and, although she is in Britain illegally, lives off welfare in a council house in Manchester, courtesy of the British taxpayer.
According to a newspaper report, a Labour campaign source was quoted as saying that the illegal immigrant “has been working voluntarily for Hazel Blears in the hope it might help her case.
“She doesn’t want to go back to Nigeria and is desperate to stay here. She’s been helping out for weeks at the local campaign office and has been out with Hazel when she meets people and goes out leafleting.”
Apparently the Nigerian had already been served with a notice on 16 April that she had 30 days to report for deportation.
The media reported that as of 30 April, she was still working at Mrs Blears’ Labour campaign office.
* Mrs Blears was forced to pay back £13,332 in capital gains tax after “flipping” her second home in the ongoing expenses swindle.
She had sold her South London home for £200,000 (£45,000 more than she paid) but escaped paying the tax by re-designating it as her primary home.
Later it emerged that she had “flipped” her second home three times in one year, all with the objective of swindling as much as she could out of the taxpayer.
Given Mrs Blear’s “expenses” swindling, it comes as no surprise that her campaign team consists of illegal immigrants who are also cheating the British taxpayer.
* The BNP’s candidate in Salford, Tina Wingfield, reports that her campaign is running well and that increasing numbers of people are turning to the BNP out of disgust at the disgraceful antics of Labour.

FALSE FURY OVER MUSLIM INSULT TO BRITISH WAR DEAD BY MAINSTREAM PARTIES


A MUSLIM who daubed ­graffiti glorifying Islamic terrorism over a war memorial has walked free from court despite showing no remorse.
Using spray paint, Shah desecrated the monument to generations of heroes with “Islam will dominate the world – Osama is on his way” and “Kill Gordon Brown”. But Crown Prosecution lawyers decided not to pursue the most serious charges for racially or religiously motivated crimes.
Instead, Shah was prosecuted on the minor charge of criminal damage and ordered to pay a mere £85 costs and £500 compensation. Roy Whenman, vice-chairman of the local Royal British Legion branch, described the offence as diabolical.
“There’s nothing worse in my eyes than discrediting a war memorial,” he said. “It dishonours those who have given their lives for our country. What I would say to them is there are other ways of expressing your anger about certain issues.”
Dennis Fletcher, chairman of East Staffordshire Racial Equality Council, said: “Graffiti of any type is ­terrible but when it includes what appears to be racist material it has to be considered utterly unacceptable.”BUT BECAUSE HE IS A MUSLIM ASIAN IT IS OK FOR HIM TO DO IT? )
Tory MP Patrick Mercer, a former Army colonel, said now was the time to bring in strict laws and punishments for yobs who insult our war heroes.
Mr Mercer, MP for Newark and Retford, said: “It strikes me that this is a gross disrespect of our war dead. It really does not help the deeply law-abiding and respectful Muslim community ( SQUIRMING FOR MUSLIM VOTES ? ) and I hope the next Conservative government will legislate against this sort of thing and introduce serious punishments.”( I DOUBT IT?)
Magistrates in Burton upon Trent, Staffordshire, heard on Thursday that Shah and a friend defaced the memorial, owned by East Staffordshire council, on December 10 last year. The comments were sprayed across the plinth outside Burton College.
A street cleaner reported the incident and photographed the damage and pictures of the offensive comments were shown in court.
CCTV footage showed two figures spraying the slogans on the memorial. Although they could not be clearly identified, the footage showed one of the vandals discarding the spray can.
Shah, who has no previous convictions, was later identified from DNA on the can and admitted his actions.
Andrew Bodger, prosecuting, said information about Shah and photos of the graffiti were sent to Crown Prosecution Service headquarters in London for a review by senior lawyers.
They decided there was insufficient evidence that the crime was racially or religiously motivated, which could have led to more serious charges and a harsher sentence.( IF HE WAS WHITE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A DIFFERENT STORY NO DOUBT?)
Mr Bodger said: “Shah wouldn’t give an explanation as to why he had done it and has shown no remorse for this very sensitive matter.
“The words were cleaned off without difficulty at a cost of £500. The CPS specialist unit was sent the pictures, as well as his mobile phone records, to see if there was a racially or religiously motivated connotation.
“It was decided there was not enough evidence to prove this, and they decided it was politically motivated. It has caused great offence to the community.” Shah admitted criminal damage and was given a two-year conditional discharge.(BULLS*&T)
Mumtaz Chaudry, defending, dismissed any claims that Shah, of Horninglow, Burton, held extremist views.
He said: “This is nothing to do with his religious beliefs, his family’s beliefs or his cultural beliefs. He is just an ordinary guy. He is remorseful, but at the time of his police interview he was simply answering questions and didn’t realise that was the right time to show remorse.
“He has no extremist views. His action was uncalled for, but we make mistakes. It was a stupid mistake and he is determined not to repeat it.”(I BET IT WAS)
A CPS spokesman last night defended the decision not to bring a more serious charge.
He said: “The conclusion in this case was that there was insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of a conviction.
'While it was appreciated that what was sprayed on the memorial may have been perceived by some to be part of a racial or religious incident, no racial or religious group can be shown to have been targeted.” (BACKING DOWN ON A SERIOUS INSULT TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE & IT,S BRAVE SOLDIERS DUE TO POLITICAL CORRECTNESS)

FOOTNOTE BY HORWICH NATIONALISTS
OUR THOUGHTS ARE IN BOLD IN THIS ARTICLE! ALSO
THIS SHOWS THAT ISLAM AND IT,S ADHERENTS CAN NEVER BE ASSIMILATED INTO OUR SOCIETY. THIS CREATURE HAS SHOW A TOTAL DISREGARD FOR THE BRITISH CULTURE HERITAGE AND TRADITIONS OF TOLERANCE, HE SHOULD BE DEPORTED TO A ISLAMIC COUNTRY WHERE HE CAN ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF WIDE SPREAD VIOLENCE AND TOTAL MORAL AND SPIRITUAL  CORRUPTION SO ENDEMIC IN ANY NATION THAT HAS A ISLAMIC MAJORITY. AND THAT THE LIBERAL ESTABLISHMENT HAS NEITHER THE RESOLVE OR COURAGE TO TACKLE THE GROWING AND DANGEROUS THREAT SHOWN BY THESE MUSLIM COLONISERS, AND THAT YOU SHOULD SERIOUSLY CONSIDER THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY HAS YOUR CHOICE ON MAY 6TH , AS THEY ARE THE ONLY PARTY TO STAND UP TO THESE VILE MONSTERS!

45,000 British National Party leaflets vanish in Post Office , massive electoral fraud?

April 30, 2010 - By BNP News
Some 45,000 British National Party leaflets for the Chelmsford constituency have “vanished” in the Post Office in a possible instance of electoral fraud so massive that the party’s national elections officer, Clive Jefferson, has called for the election in that region to be postponed.
“The Post Office have confirmed that they have a despatch note confirming receipt of the six palettes and more than 50 boxes of leaflets,” said Mr Jefferson.
The leaflets were delivered on time and were due to go out on the 23 April, timed to coincide with the arrival of the postal vote applications.
“This outrage is the single largest such case so far,” Mr Jefferson said. “We have had reports from all over the country about individual postmen throwing away small bundles of leaflets, but it is remarkable that an entire constituency’s leaflets have vanished.
“We have been to the police and have made a direct application to the returning officer, Steven Packham, to have the election postponed,” Mr Jefferson continued.
“Mr Packham initially denied that he has the ability to postpone the election. He does, of course. The last we heard from him was that he was taking further advice from the Electoral Commission.”
Mr Jefferson said the BNP had now had enough of this continuing subversion of democracy and was going to make a stand over Chelmsford.
“How can a free and fair election be run when our leaflets mysteriously vanish in such quantities?” he asked.
BNP News spoke to Graham Elson, the Post Office’s regional electoral manager for Anglia, who confirmed that an EL1 despatch note for the leaflets existed which “indicates that we have received them.”
Mr Elson added that the Post Office had offered to pay for a full reprint of the leaflets.
“This is unacceptable because the time frames involved will mean that possibly as many as 8,000 people will have already cast their postal ballots before our leaflets are even reprinted,” Mr Jefferson said.
“Time and time again we have seen blatant examples of electoral fraud being committed, and the elections still carry on as if nothing has happened. This has to stop,” Mr Jefferson said.
* Eastern regional organiser Paul Morris has been tasked with liaising with the local Post Office depot to sort the problem out, which appears to be far more widespread than just one constituency.

Belgium Common Sense Law to Go Ahead over oppresive Islamic Burka

Belgium Adopts BNP Policy as Their Parliament Votes to Ban the Burka

April 30, 2010 - By Michael Wood

Oppressive: The Burka
Belgium became the first European country to move beyond speculation about banning the oppressive desert wear after parliamentarians voted to approve a draft law banning the burka in public places.
Belgian leftists last week attempted to scupper the plans by pulling out of the ruling coalition and forcing the government to collapse.
Despite opposition from the left, a new coalition consisting of five parties managed to win the vote with all but two MPs backing the ban.
Under this legislation the Islamic dress — dubbed ‘mobile prisons’ — cannot be worn in schools, shops, streets, public parks and sports centres.
Women caught wearing the burka in public will be fined £110 and reoffending will carry a week’s jail sentence.
Anti-Islamic colonisation groups fear that this new legislation could be overturned by EU ‘human rights’ laws.
However, the bill has been carefully constructed to avoid claims of discrimination by targeting all types of clothes or veils that do not allow the wearer to be fully identified.
The Belgian bill goes before the senate for approval and should become law by July.

The British National Party will repeal all legislation enacted by successive Labour and Tory regimes which have usurped the British peoples’ basic civil liberties

April 30, 2010 - By BNP News
The British National Party will repeal all legislation enacted by successive Labour and Tory regimes which have usurped the British peoples’ basic civil liberties and has a series of proposed constitutional reforms including a new Bill of Rights.
The following are the complete sections on civil liberties and constitutional reform from the BNP’s 2010 election manifesto, previously only available in PDF format.
Restoration of Our Civil Liberties
Terrorism and the Growth of the Totalitarian State
The BNP condemns the erosion of essential democracy in Britain which has developed partly as a result of the increasingly disastrous multicultural experiment.
Britain today faces domestic terrorism from Islamists as never before in our history — caused directly by the twin policies of mass immigration and a biased Middle Eastern foreign policy.
On the one hand, the old gang parties have encouraged mass immigration which has created a large pool of disaffected Muslims in Britain, and on the other hand the same parties have actively pursued aggressive foreign policies which have served to incite the now UK-resident Islamic population.
The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have provided extra fuel to Islamists seeking to recruit terrorists from the millions-strong Muslim population in Britain.
In other words, the old parties have created the “perfect storm” for terrorism in Britain — and now used this self-created problem to justify ever-increasing repressive legislation and the destruction of our civil liberties.
A prime example is the Civil Contingencies Act which grants ministers wide-ranging powers during an emergency, including the right to amend any Act of Parliament except the Human Rights Act.
Islamist terrorism in Britain will not be stopped by repressive laws, but by dealing with the immigration problem and adopting a neutral foreign policy.
Dismantling the Repressive State
The BNP will repeal all laws designed to suppress our traditional right to freedom of speech, including those relating to race relations and religion.
We note that these laws are rarely enforced when those of non British ethnic descent denigrate and abuse the racial and religious groups indigenous to Britain.
The BNP will halt all moves to introduce ID cards as an undesirable manifestation of the surveillance society.
The BNP will repeal the 1998 Human Rights Act and withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights.
This Act and the Convention have a long record of thwarting the rights of the majority and the espousal of politically correct causes.
For example, the British government has recently been forced to prepare measures to enable the right of prisoners to vote — an altogether unjustifiable imposition.
Similar rulings have prevented the deportation of criminal elements and terror suspects.
By the same token, we shall not permit British courts to submit to international bodies or courts that override the law of the British parliament.
The BNP will not permit the extradition of Britons to foreign jurisdictions unless the laws they are alleged to have broken correspond to offences in the UK. We will reintroduce the requirement of proof and we shall revoke the European Arrest Warrant.
Constitutional Change: Protecting and Enhancing Our Heritage
Devolution: Bringing Power to the People
While we do not believe that devolution to the Scottish and Welsh assemblies was inevitable, the BNP is happy to accept that the process is in keeping with the democratic nationalist principle of subsidiarity (an organising principle which states that matters ought to be handled by the smallest, lowest or least centralised competent authority).
The problem is that this hasty revision of the Constitution has developed a number of unacceptable anomalies. Thus, although English MPs are without authority over devolved decisions affecting the people of Scotland, Wales and Ulster, MPs from those places may vote on legislation affecting the English.
More remarkable, perhaps, is that they cannot vote on issues affecting their own constituents, as this is determined within their devolved chambers.
Another problem is that a number of powers wielded by local parliaments has emanated from authority that was previously overseen by our traditional counties.
In effect this placed power into the hands of pompous and overpaid professional politicians who, for the most part, have done not a stroke in their lives to create wealth but who have absorbed it in the course of their careers.
Such a typically New Labour shambles is a recipe for friction and for future division amongst the British family of nations.
The BNP’s solution to this interlocking group of difficulties is as follows:
- Devolve all powers properly capable of exercise to local level and revived county council government, returning to the ancient and traditional pre-1974 boundaries. These powers are to include control over planning.
- Create an English parliament in Westminster. This, and the Scottish, Welsh and Stormont parliaments would oversee such functions of the present devolved administrations as cannot sensibly be accommodated by the county councils.
- Create a pan-British parliament to oversee those policy areas currently determined Westminster, plus those powers repatriated from the EU. This body would have its formal base in Westminster, though we envisage it would sit in rotation in each of the national parliaments.
- The BNP would create a standing invitation for the Irish Republic to join the pan-British parliament as an equal partner.
The House of Lords
The role of the Lords as a revising chamber, stripped of its political cronies, requires further assessment.
At this stage, however, we can state that we see an opportunity to introduce not a simply elected duplicate of the Lower House, but a body which might provide weight to specialised experience in certain fields, such as expertise in charities, community groups, industry, commerce, agriculture, the armed forces and such like.
There exists, therefore, the opportunity to bring to bear on government the objectivity of non-party political experts and individuals chosen on the grounds of talent and service.
Further investigation is needed so as to exploit this opportunity for better governance.
Citizens’ Initiative Referenda
The BNP proposes the introduction of citizens’ initiative referenda as an important check and balance on the political class.
Individual citizens need only collect the requisite number of electors’ signatures on any given petition initiative — the wording of which they themselves will determine — in order to compel the local or national government to hold the relevant referendum.
If passed by between 50 and 66 percent of the voting public, such a referendum would create a comprehensive council/parliamentary debate on the topic in hand. If passed by over two thirds of those voting, however, the result would automatically become binding.
A New Bill of Rights
The 1688 Declaration of Rights, which in essence updated the 1215 Magna Carta, was given its parliamentary seal of approval in the terms of the 1689 Bill of Rights.
Later described as the most important document of all time by American constitutionalists, the 1689 Bill of Rights provided the Americans with the basis behind their constitution a century later.
The 1688 Declaration, however, was a compact between monarch and people. Its articles are therefore arguably inviolable.
To allay any doubts, we shall set out in a new Bill of Rights those parts of Magna Carta and the 1689 Bill of Rights which are still relevant to the modern age.
We do not necessarily believe that a written document will prevent future governments from seeking to undermine or distort the new guarantees we shall provide.
But by setting out, in readily accessible print, a document of universally-known importance, a tripwire will be available with which to alert any future generation that a ruling class has again arisen with concepts above its station.
The Right to Bear Arms
The right to bear arms is encapsulated in the 1688 Declaration of Rights. Firearms do not kill people; criminals kill people — especially when the innocent people do not possess firearms with which to defend themselves.
The BNP would restore to legitimate and law-abiding sportsmen the right to possess and use those weapons curtailed by the 1968 Firearms Act and subsequently restricted by later legislation.
Protecting the Democratic Process
The democratic process in Britain has been subverted by a number of electoral rule changes which have impacted upon the rights of citizens to organise in democratic parties and freely express their opinions.
As a result, the BNP will introduce legislation which will:
- Guarantee the right of all law-abiding organisations and individuals to organise and campaign free from interference from the state, trades unions, employers’ organisations or commercial entities.
- Protect all political parties and groups from the use of violence or intimidation for political purposes. The violation of this law will carry a minimum two year prison term.
- Disband all state-sponsored efforts to exploit the ethnic minority vote by means of programmes such as Operation Black Vote.
- Restrict postal voting — currently subject to grave abuse — to the sick and elderly or those who are absent overseas.
- Outlaw third party organisations who do not contest elections from issuing material designed to denigrate individual candidates or parties, thereby allowing political rivals to circumvent the proper spending limits on election expenses.
- Outlaw the conducting or publication of opinion polls in the last three weeks of an election campaign to prevent manipulation of the democratic process.
- Ensure that political parties organise and function only with such funds as they are able to raise from their own members and supporters to ensure that the political process is not bought by vested interests. State funding, corporate donations and political dues from trades unions will be outlawed.
- Electors will be enabled to fire or ‘recall’ their MP in circumstances of serious criminality.
- Reintroduce treason legislation to prosecute those who undermine the British constitution.


CAUGHT OUT NU LABOURS ALLIES USING LIES & DIRTY TRICKS TO SMEAR OPPONENTS

CAUGHT IN THE ACT NU LABOURS ALLIES USING LIES & DIRTY TRICKS TO SMEAR  IT OPPONENTS





In the video, the cameraman confronts an agent from Hope not Hate interfering in the democratic process by distributing anti-BNP literature during a general election.

Now I greatly admire the cameraman for confronting the Hope not Hate agent, because these people when approached usually resort to violence as a way of punching home their Marxist views.  It would have been better if he had been a bit calmer in his questioning but in fairness, most British People are not used to being in a confrontational situation and so he done well in my opinion.

But the captions in the video are not quite correct.  The creator of the video failed to mention that Hope not Hate are an umbrella organisation for the communist organisation Searchlight, that is run by the convicted criminal Gerry "Unstable" Gable.

Now Searchlight is a registered Third Party that does not stand in elections.  That is not its purpose.  The people would never vote for their mad marxist policies.  Their role, that is funded by the government, is to campaign against those who are opposed to The Establishment and in this case their target is the BNP.

And the amount of money - your money - that they have to spend is not inconsiderable.  Consider this information that is taken from the Electoral Commission from the 2005 elections and written about in this article here and repeated below.

"Third Party" campaigns are a way for The Establishment to exceed the legal campaign allowance for advertising leaflets. And who do we see included in the list. None other than;
  • Searchlight Information Services Ltd £65,275.00
  • Unite Against Fascism £43,045.13
  • Muslim Friends of Labour £44,810.00
The British National Party is committed to outlawing this undemocratic practise of allowing Third Parties such as Searchlight, the SWP/UAF and trade unions and letting only those who are prepared to be part of the electoral process campaign.
Read More