Search This Blog

Saturday 29 June 2013

Keiser Report: Peek-a-boo Accounting (E464)

The British government's jihad against free thought | Melanie Phillips

The British government's jihad against free thought | Melanie Phillips
 

The British government's jihad against free thought

Published in: Melanie's blog
By banning from the country as extremists the American anti-jihadis Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller, the Home Secretary Teresa May has not only made herself look ridiculous but has sent the enemies of the United Kingdom the message that they have it on the run.
I do not support the approach taken by either Geller or Spencer to the problem of Islamic extremism. Both have endorsed groups such as the EDL and others which at best do not deal with the thuggish elements in their ranks and at worst are truly racist or xenophobic.
The result has been a serious blow to the credibility of these two writers, with particular damage being done to Spencer whose scholarship in itself is scrupulous. It has also split the defence against Islamic extremism, and handed a potent propaganda weapon to those who seek falsely to portray as bigoted extremists all who are engaged in the defence of the west against the Islamic jihad.
Nevertheless, the decision to ban this duo from Britain is unjustified, oppressive and comes perilously close to lining up the British government alongside those who wish to silence defenders of the west against the jihad, making a total mockery of Britain’s understanding of just who presents a danger to the state.
Neither Geller nor Spencer remotely presents such a danger. They intended to come to Britain to join an EDL rally in Woolwich, in the wake of the barbaric murder there of Drummer Lee Rigby by two Islamists last month.
Personally, I believe the EDL is not a respectable platform to join. Whether or not its rally is itself a threat to public order is, however, another issue. As far as is known, it is not being banned. It is only Geller and Spencer who have been banned from the country on the grounds that their presence is ‘not conducive to the public good’. The implication is that they will incite violence or disorder. But all the two of them do is criticise Islam, condemn jihadis and warn against the west’s failure to take seriously their machinations.
One may think they go too far, that some of their views are unpleasant or offensive or wrong; but that is surely no reason to ban them from the country. What on earth have we come to, after all, when the British Home Secretary is banning people on the basis that they criticise Islam and warn against jihadi violence? Is this not exactly the menacing argument mounted by Islamic extremists, that any condemnation of Islamic extremism is to be banned as ‘Islamophobic’?
Moreover, from the text of the Home Secretary’s letter to Spencer, it would appear that the reason for the the ban is that the British government is now telling people that certain interpretations of Islam are to be proscribed, even if they may be true – a truly terrifying and totalitarian development, and an open assault upon freedom of thought and expression, not to mention religious scholarship.
And if the argument is that any criticism of Islam may incite violence against Muslims, then by the same token Mrs May should ban all criticism of Israel -- on the much firmer grounds that there is a clearly demonstrated correlation between hate campaigns against Israel and attacks on Jews and Jewish institutions. Of course, that would be unthinkable.  So why the double standard?
And that is what is particularly intolerable here -- that Mrs May is allowing people to run around Britain who really are stirring up hatred and worse, but who appear to be untouchable because they are Islamists. The Commentator has drawn attention to  the recent entry to Britain of Muhammad Al-Arifi, a Saudi scholar who has declared that Shia Muslims are ‘evil’ and also stated  that ‘...al-Qaeda leader Sheikh Oussama Bin Laden, may his soul rest in peace, did not adopt many of the thoughts that are attributed to him today’.
The government also allowed into the country Shady Al-Suleiman, the Australian cleric who has called ‘for Allah to destroy the enemies of Islam’, who has endorsed Hamas which Britain recognises as a terrorist entity, and even endorsed the killing of British soldiers, saying, ‘Give victory to all the Mujahideen all over the world. Oh Allah, prepare us for the jihad’.
Aren’t these men, who foment sectarian division and endorse terrorism, not ‘conducive to the public good’?
So why did Mrs May ban Spencer and Geller? Was it because of the petition to do so by Hope not Hate -- which misrepresented and smeared them by claiming they called all Muslims savages (they did not)? Was it in response to one of the signatories to this petition, Tony Lloyd, Greater Manchester’s Police and Crime Commissioner (who Spencer and Geller say also misrepresented what they have said) who termed them
‘hate preachers – every bit as bad as those who use the name of Islam to propagate hatred’?
What an extraordinary thing to say. Geller and Spencer don’t go round calling for people to be killed, or preaching genocide or holy war, or spreading conspiracy theories and lies to foment hysteria and hatred. But when he was chairman of the Parliamentary Labour Party, Tony Lloyd led a delegation to Gaza to meet leaders of Hamas, where he was photographed fraternally shaking the hand of the Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh.
So Lloyd is happy to meet with a group whose leader has called Israel a ‘cancerous tumour that must be removed’ and whose officials have said
‘the Jews are the most despicable and contemptible nation to crawl upon the face of the earth, because they have displayed hostility to Allah…Allah will kill the Jews in the hell of the world to come, just like they killed the believers in the hell of this world’
and
‘...the Jewish faith does not wish for peace nor stability, since it is a faith that is based on murder: “I kill, therefore I am”... Israel is based only on blood and murder in order to exist, and it will disappear, with Allah's will, through blood and shahids [martyrs]’
– and yet he called for Spencer and Geller to be banned as ‘hate preachers’, a demand which the Home Secretary agrees was justified even as she allows real hate preachers to spread their poison around Britain.
Has Britain now totally lost the plot?

More Important Updates For Gold, Silver, Stocks,The Fed. By Gregory Mann...

Sunday 9 June 2013

Why have UAF(Useful Idiots)antifascists decided to target UKIP?

Why have antifascists decided to target UKIP?

fron m the Tea Room June , 2013 
Why have antifascists decided to target UKIP?
Gary Robinson, a UKIP activist asks why antifascists have decided to target UKIP.
Until recently, I didn’t pay much attention to the UK’s anti-fascist groups. I knew little more about them than that they opposed the racialist British National Party.
BNP
The BNP’s success in 2009 (where they gained two members of the European Parliament) seems to have been their undoing – the party has fractured and been rocked by in-fighting ever since.
Former BNP MEP Andrew Brons was reported in the Telegraph as saying that “80 or 90 per cent of the party’s members, activists and former officials had left it”
According to Wikipedia, The BNP can now only boast one MEP and two councillors. Their membership teeters on the brink at 4200. I predict they will lose their remaining MEP in 2014.
The BNP Hold A Demonstration In Central London
Antifascists
British ‘antifascists’ then surely have two choices – congratulate themselves on a job well done and retire from their activities or go after the National Front, a party that has seen a massive resurgence of late.
National Front
The resurgence of the National Front was stimulated by the BNP’s 2010 decision to start accepting non-white members. It was also flooded with BNP defectors dismayed by constant infighting. The party has been holding dozens of street stalls across the nation in 2013 in locations as diverse as Wigan and Swansea.
Recently however, anti-fascists seem to have taken the bizarre decision to target the moderate UK Independence Party or UKIP instead.
UKIP
Nick Lowles, director of Hope Not Hate said in a Huffington post article : “Ukip is not a far right party, or even intrinsically racist.” Former Labour MEP Glyn Ford, now the UAF’s Europe officer has said “Ukip are not a fascist party”.
On a Channel Four news discussion in May 2013, the well-known Anti-fascist campaigner Matthew Collins said: “They [UKIP] are not a fascist organisation…they are very different to the BNP in a lot of ways” Diane Abbot MP said at the United Against Fascism conference “UKIP is obviously not a Fascist party”.
nigelfarage
So why target UKIP?
So if we are not a fascist or far right party, why target UKIP? I believe the answer is simple – many of these anti-fascist groups are linked to the extreme left and militant elements within the Labour party.  While UKIP concentrated on taking donors, votes and councillors from The Conservative party these groups said nothing.
When we started gaining support in the North of England, much of which is traditionally Labour controlled, suddenly there were hastily-arranged meetings held by these groups in which the main topic of conversation was the increase in UKIP support. These actions are not motivated by anti-fascist ideology at all. Anti-fascists are being cynically used by extreme left politicians for no other reason than they like their jobs and want to continue drawing in their huge salaries.
Nigel Farage & UKIP's Eastleigh candidate, Diane James
Nigel Farage & UKIP’s Eastleigh candidate, Diane James
Some facts about UKIP
Unlike the BNP, UKIP have never had a whites only member policy. Our membership rules prevent ex-BNP and National Front members from being members of UKIP.  We have black and ethnic minority candidates and seek to rebuild links with the commonwealth. While we do want to reduce immigration, we don’t want a closed door or forced repatriation.
In summary then, UKIP are being targeted unfairly for purely party political reasons – and I would urge all genuine anti-fascists to do their own homework on these issues instead of relying on wealthy Labour and communist apparatchiks to tell you who to oppose.

Saturday 8 June 2013

UKIP MARCH INTO HORWICH AND LABOUR LACKEYS TOLD HOME TRUTHS

There is to be a by election later this month in Horwich, on Thurs 20th of June for a seat on Horwich Town Council.

And the good news coming in, is that the trade union lackeys who canvass for that EVIL organisation,The labour party is that they are having the doors slammed in there faces and are being widely being told what they really are. TRAITORS AND SCUM!!!!! By ordinary decent working class Horwich folk. Sick of the betrayal of there hopes and ambitions and nation. By a group of traitors that consider them sheep only to be dealt with at election time. While all the countries resources that should be spent on them . Have been given to foreigners and big multi national banks.

I must say that I have had the privilege of throwing there vile leaflets back in there faces and telling all four of them, (Yes they are afraid to go alone into white working class areas.) That they are scum and traitors. 

But on a better news there is a UKIP candidate running for election , And I must say they are delivering a excellent leaflet that exposes the traitors actions of the Labour party. And I call on all Horwich residents to read the leaflet thoroughly , and also that they exercise there Democratic right before the Lib/Lab/Con alliance take it away for ever,and vote for the UKIP candidate. 
I have uploaded the leaflet for you to view and hope very much that you consider what it says seriously.


Wednesday 5 June 2013

Rowan Williams and Islamophilia: A Very Metropolitan Malady | Melanie Phillips

Rowan Williams and Islamophilia: A Very Metropolitan Malady | Melanie Phillips

Published in: Melanie's blog
You've really got to hand it to Dr Rowan Williams, the erstwhile Archbishop of Canterbury – he's got a sense of timing to die for.
Five years ago, he set off a cultural earthquake when, as head of the Anglican Communion, he made a speech in the Royal Courts of Justice in London in which he welcomed the 'inevitable' accommodation of Islamic sharia law in the UK.
At no stage, neither then nor subsequently, did he ever indicate that he regretted the intellectual fatuity and legal and theological shallowness of this suicide note for Britain's ancient culture.  Nor the deep shock felt by many that the country's principal Christian prelate was cheerfully willing on the Balkanisation of Britain and the destruction of its foundational democratic principle of 'one law for all'. Nor even that he understood this was the import of what he had said.
Now, some ten days after the barbaric murder in Woolwich, south London of Drummer Lee Rigby at the hands of Islamic fanatics quoting the Koran, Dr Williams looks set to repeat his triumph.
In what promises to be a high-profile event in the lawyers' Temple Church in London – which for some reason has taken a lead in promoting sharia in the UK – Dr Williams will today help launch a new book, Islam and English Law, published by Cambridge University Press.
According to the pre-launch blurb, the book will ask:
  • 'Is sharia law compatible with the European Convention of Human Rights?
  • Should English law give greater recognition to Islamic custom and practice?
  • Should freedom of speech be restrained to protect Muslims' sensibilities?
  • Can Muslims be full members, in good conscience and without qualification, of our pluralist society?'
and also
'…what changes, if any, to legal provision and practice will narrow division between the UK's communities, promote understanding and accommodation – and, to improve the protection offered to them all.'
Well, I suppose it's possible that the book – along with Dr Williams -- will answer that last question by saying: 'Stop sharia now'. Such an answer would certainly bring relief to the many thousands of British Muslims who want to live in freedom and security under democracy, equal human rights and 'one law for all'.
However, given that the contributors to this book are
Abdullahi An-Na'im, Mashood Baderin, Marion Boyd, Nicolas Bratza, Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, Ian Edge, Khaled Abou El Fadl, David Ford, Robin Griffith-Jones, Mark Hill, Stephen Hockman, Sydney Kentridge, Christopher McCrudden, Dominic McGoldrick, Tariq Modood, Nicholas Phillips, Tariq Ramadan, Albie Sachs, Shaheen Sardar Ali, Prakash Shah and Rowan Williams,
I'd guess that the answer to the questions listed under the bullet-points above might be mostly 'yes', 'yes', 'yes' and 'yes'.
If so, then Dr Williams will doubly deserve his place in the pantheon of ridicule savaged by Douglas Murray in his dazzling new book, Islamophilia, which I am delighted to be publishing today as the latest title from my new electronic imprint, emBooks, in response to the Woolwich atrocity and its aftermath.
Islamophilia  is not about terrorism. It is not about Islam. It is not about Muslims. It is instead about those utterly ridiculous public figures -- including movie stars, literary giants, pop idols, army generals, bishops, museum curators and politicians -- in whom an epidemic loss of cultural nerve and the terror of losing their reputation in fashionable circles has made them victims of the debilitating affliction of Islamophilia. The book is laugh-out-loud funny. It is also jaw-dropping. And it is tragic.
This little firecracker fulfills my aim when I launched emBooks last month – to provide a platform for writers of talent and integrity to describe the world as it is, not as some people would like to remake it. My hope is thus to get right away from the polarisation and caricatures of so much political and cultural life, and reclaim instead the true, decent, rational centre ground of western society from those who have hijacked it.
I hope lots of people will join me.

About Melanie

Melanie Phillips is a British journalist and author. She is best known for her controversial column about political and social issues which currently appears in the Daily Mail. Awarded the Orwell Prize for journalism in 1996, she is the author of All Must Have Prizes, an acclaimed study of Britain's educational and moral crisis, which provoked the fury of educationists and the delight and relief of parents.
Read full biography

Books

  • The World Turned Upside Down
  • Londonistan

Rowan Williams and Islamophilia: A Very Metropolitan Malady | Melanie Phillips

Rowan Williams and Islamophilia: A Very Metropolitan Malady | Melanie Phillips

Published in: Melanie's blog
You've really got to hand it to Dr Rowan Williams, the erstwhile Archbishop of Canterbury – he's got a sense of timing to die for.
Five years ago, he set off a cultural earthquake when, as head of the Anglican Communion, he made a speech in the Royal Courts of Justice in London in which he welcomed the 'inevitable' accommodation of Islamic sharia law in the UK.
At no stage, neither then nor subsequently, did he ever indicate that he regretted the intellectual fatuity and legal and theological shallowness of this suicide note for Britain's ancient culture.  Nor the deep shock felt by many that the country's principal Christian prelate was cheerfully willing on the Balkanisation of Britain and the destruction of its foundational democratic principle of 'one law for all'. Nor even that he understood this was the import of what he had said.
Now, some ten days after the barbaric murder in Woolwich, south London of Drummer Lee Rigby at the hands of Islamic fanatics quoting the Koran, Dr Williams looks set to repeat his triumph.
In what promises to be a high-profile event in the lawyers' Temple Church in London – which for some reason has taken a lead in promoting sharia in the UK – Dr Williams will today help launch a new book, Islam and English Law, published by Cambridge University Press.
According to the pre-launch blurb, the book will ask:
  • 'Is sharia law compatible with the European Convention of Human Rights?
  • Should English law give greater recognition to Islamic custom and practice?
  • Should freedom of speech be restrained to protect Muslims' sensibilities?
  • Can Muslims be full members, in good conscience and without qualification, of our pluralist society?'
and also
'…what changes, if any, to legal provision and practice will narrow division between the UK's communities, promote understanding and accommodation – and, to improve the protection offered to them all.'
Well, I suppose it's possible that the book – along with Dr Williams -- will answer that last question by saying: 'Stop sharia now'. Such an answer would certainly bring relief to the many thousands of British Muslims who want to live in freedom and security under democracy, equal human rights and 'one law for all'.
However, given that the contributors to this book are
Abdullahi An-Na'im, Mashood Baderin, Marion Boyd, Nicolas Bratza, Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, Ian Edge, Khaled Abou El Fadl, David Ford, Robin Griffith-Jones, Mark Hill, Stephen Hockman, Sydney Kentridge, Christopher McCrudden, Dominic McGoldrick, Tariq Modood, Nicholas Phillips, Tariq Ramadan, Albie Sachs, Shaheen Sardar Ali, Prakash Shah and Rowan Williams,
I'd guess that the answer to the questions listed under the bullet-points above might be mostly 'yes', 'yes', 'yes' and 'yes'.
If so, then Dr Williams will doubly deserve his place in the pantheon of ridicule savaged by Douglas Murray in his dazzling new book, Islamophilia, which I am delighted to be publishing today as the latest title from my new electronic imprint, emBooks, in response to the Woolwich atrocity and its aftermath.
Islamophilia  is not about terrorism. It is not about Islam. It is not about Muslims. It is instead about those utterly ridiculous public figures -- including movie stars, literary giants, pop idols, army generals, bishops, museum curators and politicians -- in whom an epidemic loss of cultural nerve and the terror of losing their reputation in fashionable circles has made them victims of the debilitating affliction of Islamophilia. The book is laugh-out-loud funny. It is also jaw-dropping. And it is tragic.
This little firecracker fulfills my aim when I launched emBooks last month – to provide a platform for writers of talent and integrity to describe the world as it is, not as some people would like to remake it. My hope is thus to get right away from the polarisation and caricatures of so much political and cultural life, and reclaim instead the true, decent, rational centre ground of western society from those who have hijacked it.
I hope lots of people will join me.

About Melanie

Melanie Phillips is a British journalist and author. She is best known for her controversial column about political and social issues which currently appears in the Daily Mail. Awarded the Orwell Prize for journalism in 1996, she is the author of All Must Have Prizes, an acclaimed study of Britain's educational and moral crisis, which provoked the fury of educationists and the delight and relief of parents.
Read full biography

Books

  • The World Turned Upside Down
  • Londonistan