Search This Blog

Thursday, 31 May 2012



The carnage in Syria carries on.
Last week Cameron said he would possibly send British troops to that country and now Hollande of France says his country could take military action.

Let's step back a bit away from all the politicing and take an impartial look at the situation.

The Assad regime is and has been notorious for suppressing dissent but in that multicultural society a firm hand could have been necessary to stop civil war.
Free speech is suppressed and the people yearn to be free.

In that aspect Syria is similar to our supposedly democratic country.
We have been invaded  by aliens with the collusion of our governments of both the main parties. We do not wish to see our town's streets infested with these people, let alone paying taxes to support them.

Ah yes you could say, we have the freedom of the vote and free speech.
Do we? What choice have we? The major parties have similar policies on immigration and free speech so we have no choice there.
But we have a free press you may say.

NO. The press is controlled by the same Common Purpose dictatorship which rules the political parties.
New or smaller parties who oppose their anti democratic cabal are routinely vilified in the media, their policies distorted and supporters forced to hold their tongues in order to keep their jobs.
Only today a woman was sentenced to 21 week's jail for saying WHAT MILLIONS THINK.




There is a rebellion in Syria against a tyranny. Could it happen here?
Well no, or not yet.
An interesting aspect of the Syrian rebellion is the relative impotence of that government to silence the rebels. Our police and army would have gone through a rebellion like a dose of salt.
This means the rebels are armed, so the question must be, by whom?
Foreign influence is obvious here as is a supply of arms to the rebels. It suits the globalists to ferment trouble in Syria to overcome the present regime.

Russia and China have until now acted as a brake on precipitate action by that poodle of the globalists, the UN. These two countries realise that if they grant legitimacy to foreign intervention into internal affairs this could legitimise interference in their own country's affairs and so will not play ball.
Another interesting aspect of this crisis is the relitive absence of concern of countries supposedly liberated in the "Arab Spring", in fact the only Arab countries helping the rebels are such "democracies" as Saudi Arabia and some Gulf states.Turkey is standing by, waiting to pick up some spoils after the fall of the Assad regime.

Now I accept atrocities have been committed by that regime but am sure as the Russians say both sides have done the same.
It is obvious that an international cabal under the UN is determined to destabilise and overthrow Assad. Who is behind that we can only have a GOOD guess at.

The point is that the rebellion is an internal one for Syria and none of our business. We should keep our noses out and certainly not risk the lives of any more of our troops.


BUT WHAT CHANCE HAVE WE of ridding ourselves of the equally undemocratic system we now have?

On the pretext of avoiding gun crime (that's a laugh) British citizens have been disarmed and we are now powerless and in the clutches of international globalist capitalists.
We are mere units of production to be used to further the agenda,softened up by television trash shows to keep us temporarily subdued. Our pubs and clubs have been systematically destroyed by big business interests and with them our sense of community so that our virility and power to resist, replaced by propaganda stuffed in our face by the television.

Bread and circuses they called it in the past.

Revolutions start in tap rooms, and that is why the government is destroying pubs.

If you put all the things happening, at home and internationally and think about it I believe it is impossible to miss a sinister plan by those in power.
For further details read 1984.

And in our "free" country you can desecrate our cenotaph and get a slap on the wrist but tell aliens you don't like them here when drunk you get 21 weeks.

Justice and freedom?

Equality & Diversity. Enoch Powell’s ‘whip hand’ prophecy made reality

Embrace Diversity Button 120 x 118Equality & Diversity; Enoch Powell’s ‘whip hand’ prophecy made reality

A Nationalist Teachers Perspective.

It has been clear for some time that the horrors of multiculturalism are being injected like a narcotic into every aspect of our British society. A debilitating drug that is very much as dangerous as heroin, but state induced.
The majority of this article is set around a compulsory training session arranged by a college in the West of England.
Rather than having the governments desired effect, most staff regarded it as a warning as to just how much danger Britain is in from this frankly criminal piece of legislation.
Imagine if you will; A lecture theatre with around 150 plus white middle class lecturers being read the riot act by a Mr Mohammed Patel, a small bespectacled Muslim man complete with uniform beard, verifying the fact that E&D can only be administered by someone of an ethnic background. This is Enoch Powells ‘whip hand over the white man’ in action. It’s here already. Ethnic minorities now have dominion over us.
Mr Mohammed Patel is the head of equality and diversity at Petroc College Devon and from there spreads his vile racism. He was quick to refer to the Public Sector Equality Duty – PSED Race Relations act amendment 2001, that instructs teachers that they have a Promotional duty to enforce E&D, in his own words; “as you have been getting away with murder”!

And of course while this man was talking about murder the subject of Steven Lawrence raised its well worn head and was talked about at length, but with no mention of the vile racist attacks that are committed on the Indigenous white British community which occur on an almost daily basis. No margin given to the fact that racism in this country cuts both ways and it is actually more prevalent against white people than the ethnic minorities. He believes that it never happens the other way round. The truth is most of us are too scared to even look at the enrichers these days.

Mr Patel never said it, but his intention was clear to us. It is you white people in your comfy little Cotswold towns that are racists. Racist, because white majorities haven’t actively gone out and dragged ethnic minorities into Gloucestershire, to make it less ‘hideously white’ to quote one Labour MP.

He then talked enthusiastically about the coming power shift and cited Leicester as a GOOD example of how ‘we’ would like to see the United Kingdom in the very near future. Do we want that?

At the opening of the Christmas market in Morton in Marsh there was a stand for the local scouting group. A banner advertising scouting had three Muslim girls complete with hijab head scarves showed how the scouting organisation of Great Britain now sees itself. Morton in Marsh is a quaint little Cotswold market town with a 99.9% white majority. It’s not down town Mumbai, its not Leicester, Birmingham or even Coventry, but this is the way that these organisations are being forced to present themselves even if it is not representative of the population it is appealing to.

Leicester has fallen, 51/52% of people there are not of Indigenous British origin, more if you include other European countries. London is falling, Birmingham is falling and other towns and cities are not far behind.

It wasn’t long before the E&D man couldn’t resist having a knock at Enoch Powell. He referred to Powell’s inspired piece of oratory as Enoch Powell’s “infamous’ speech”, He said; “Powell was generalising, so take it with a pinch of salt”.

Enoch Powell’s speech was a warning that has come true a hundred fold in the light of the race riots last August. If it was a generalisation, it is now a statement of fact!

Mr Patel made a series of statements in his lecture to support Equality and Diversity in the classroom to which all teachers must adhere to, and they are important and need to be analysed individually:

1) Advised us to ‘enjoy’ rather than ‘celebrate’ diversity.

No one would doubt that a certain amount of taking in of other cultures is in fact a healthy thing to engage in. After all the British Empire was built on the study and enjoyment of the cultures of the countries lucky enough to be part of the worlds largest and most prestigious Empire in human history (the liberal elite are hopelessly embarrassed by the Empire and wish to make amends by destroying all vestiges of pride in it).
But like all healthy enjoyment it should be at the behest of the individual to make up their mind as to who, what, when and where the individual studies or enjoys other cultures. It is not and should not be a mandatory requirement to show that you have purposefully entered into the study and absorbed other cultures as a matter of law. If there is one culture in this country that it should be law to study then it should be British culture.
We are at a crossroads where we have put the study of Indian, Chinese and Muslim cultures before our own. And when British history is taught it is always taught from the angle that the British culture could not have done it or even survived without the support of a tiny number of none British people.
For example; at the RAF museum at Cosford there are now information boards promoting the achievements of non British indigenous people involved in the Second World War, but the way this is displayed gives an incorrect impression that ethnic minorities had a more important role than the native British majority.
Their treacherous aim is to teach our children that we were not the great nation that we once undoubtedly were, and are, and will be again. Their aim is to blatantly tell lies and to rewrite history in the same abominable way Hollywood does.
2) Mr Patel said; Catalyst was Race driven and plays the pivotal role.
The question has to be asked why? Why race driven? Surely equality and diversity is about inclusion, which is about everyone, all people. Disabled people, old people, young people, poor people, rich people all pulling on an equal rope.

But it’s not equality and inclusion, its equality and DIVERSITY!

The diversity of race, and sexual orientation which is the agenda of its champions who are largely the criminals in Westminster. It is easy to accuse patriots of being racists, when it is the leftist liberals who are forcing us down a blind alley that are the real racists.
Racists who claim quite legally that there is ‘no such thing as an indigenous British people’ when they know that there has been an indigenous people here for thousands of years.

3) The white British are failing ethnic groups.

The only time the British nation failed ethnic groups is when we embarked on two World Wars that did not need to be fought, thus bankrupting the nation and forcing us to withdraw from our colonies. That is our failing.

The fact that we were neither asked or indeed wanted mass immigration does not mean that even if they are here now do we owe them any special consideration. Assimilate! Come and join in with our game or go away! That’s real equality.

4) Equality & Diversity is as important as health and safety

This is such an unintelligent remark to make to anyone let alone academics especially when it is said by an alleged academic. Making sure Abdul feels like he’s got as much or more chance as James is not as important as making sure Abdul and James don’t get their heads cut off in some industrial accident!

Leave it to the bleeding heart liberals and it won’t be an industrial accident that cuts James' head off!

5) The Koran does not preach killing, (except where it preaches killing!)

Interesting that Mr Patel had to single out his religion as not being intolerant, when he had equal opportunity to talk about Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism and Christianity. Christianity has had its moments in the past; however this is not the past. Its today! Christianity has moved on, developed, become liberal; too liberal. Islam remains the same. The same incarnation of 1300 years ago, with the same aims and objectives: ‘Kill the infidel’.

6) Educate by guilt trips.

Children are now being monitored for anything that could be construed as a racist remark;-it has to be recorded and so a profile is built up on this child which is branded a ‘risk’ to the multicultural state project. But of course it doesn’t stop there as it must be factored in that this so called dangerous thinking must be coming from somewhere, so the parents and family are also put under suspicion.
This is Stasi state oppression. Challenging the utterance of so called ‘inappropriate language’ is one thing, but this monitoring of private conversations at home so the dossiers of suspected unbelievers grow and grow until enough evidence for ‘gagging’ is collected.

All parents should now as a matter of course question their children as to what they have been doing at school and what their teachers have been asking them. Those who are familiar with the work of Brian Gerrish will be aware of the worrying trends in education and the potentially lethal use of NLP in schools, so that they as parents can act to undo some of the brain washing that is going on.

7) Peoples behaviour is down to good teaching of parents!

This statement claims that the current parental generation were incorrectly educated, that we need re-educating; corrective education. Like the corrective institutions set up by the Communists to re-educate wrong thinkers that did not appreciate what the party was doing for them.

8) Minorities first – majority second.

This was reminiscent of the pol pot regime and the ‘tall poppy syndrome; One poppy is standing taller than the rest, so you ‘snip’ it down so all are the same.
We must all suffer for the welfare of the ethnic minorities that are flooding our shores, because the liberal elite insist that we are responsible for their plight and that our old people must freeze this winter so that they can be warm. It is the liberal elite that are responsible for it, for they have created this problem. The ‘so called’ wars of regime change and introduction of ‘their’ kind of capitalist democracy have been responsible for killing more civilians in the name of ‘saving civilians from being killed by they own government’. Thus a conflict that has had nothing to do with us, has been made ten times worse, by the elite and made the inevitable migration of refugees from the conflict even greater.
9) We are not being flooded by immigrants.
Anyone can see with their own eyes if they wish to see that our towns and cities have changed beyond recognition. Standing in the centre of Banbury you will struggle to hear English being spoken, and this is the same in every major conurbation. It is clear that teachers are required to swallow all that they are fed. A lie is a lie.
10) Political correctness fault of, and driven by media; all negativity of PC stories are fabrications, everything is alright’
The fact of the matter is this:It’s actually much worse that the ridiculous stories peddled by the leftist state controlled media. The stories that are let through are often doctored complete fabrications to give an idea that the government is aware of the situation and engaged in combating it, or on the other hand take any credence from patriotic organisations. I refer to Jack Straws unbelievable admission to the fact that Muslim paedophile gangs are operating almost freely in the UK. And Cameron’s recent statement that immigration is bad for this country. We know! We’ve been saying this for years, but if a patriot publicly states this then the government will try to imprison him for it.
The Straw’s and the Cameron’s didn’t mean it, they never mean it and will never, ever do anything about it, but to be seen and heard to speak out against it means the man on the street will think it’s being tackled and nationalism's message is now defunct and pointless. Make no mistake, the Lliblabcon don’t care about the British people. The globalists of the Liblabcon think that Britain is a puddle they can just step out of. That the British people are cheap, they are a commodity to be exploited, in just the same way they think the economic migrants are. However they have underestimated the long term goals of the growing Islamic population. Jim Dowson’s iron law of repopulation sits uncomfortably with us all.
11) E&D should be a moral exultation rather than legal obligation.
Teachers are expected to feel guilty again. What about the moral obligation to your own people, our people who have never, ever been asked whether we wanted mass immigration and our neighbourhoods, cities, towns and soon our villages and countryside changed beyond all recognition into third world shanty towns.
12) Mr Patel has been given a large budget to promote gypsies alone.

Mohammed Patel gives no quarter to the financial preservation of green belt that is now under attack from gypsy colonisation groups that use legal aid financed by our taxes to cut around and find loop holes, or even cheat the system to build ugly and unhygienic shanty towns in the Cotswold's and other areas of protected natural beauty. But no local authority dares take them on because the law, government and liberal apologists are on the side of the criminal Gypsies gangs that rip off and intimidate decent and law abiding citizens. Criminal, you know it, the states, knows it and of course they know it. But there is nothing the people can do about it. New Labour brought in around ten E&D laws in their death throws in 2010, purely aimed at gagging the majority.
13) Ethnic groups should not go to you, YOU should go to them.
If they wanted to join our society then join it they must. Our society and land do not need enriching by them and especially their cultures. They need, and should be enriched by us and our society. Any person whether ethnic minority, immigrant, of European decent, French, German etc, white or even indigenous British who does not like the way this country is or looks, or conducts itself can leave.
These are the sort of policies that are being imposed in our educational institutions, but it gets worse.

Limiting grade if schools and colleges do not satisfy E&D for OFSTED.
There is the case of an art teacher being given feed back after an OFSTED class inspection. A life drawing class was judged to be outstanding, but would only be given a grade three (‘one’ being best and ‘four’ being fail) because the observer regarded the attention to E&D as ‘purely tokenistic’. The teacher replied that it was purely tokenistic, as how on earth does one get Equality and diversity into drawing a piece of fruit!
The truth of this maybe that this inspector doesn’t believe in E&D anymore than any decent man on the street, however the fact is that this inspector along with every other decent teacher in this land knows that if they put a foot wrong with this, then there will be a ‘tremor in the web’, their careers could well be on the line and they are scared.
Scared, to be marked with Trevor Phillips red hot racist branding iron and be cast into the pit with rest of the decent British work force.
Scared, to stand and stand apart and say; ‘I do not agree with this’! They cannot speak out against a state that is built on the fear of being cast out of society as an evil patriot. Patriots are all too aware of these chains that bind them more and more, but the job they have to do is relay this to other people who are ignorant or choose to ignore the dangers. The treatment of Emma West, the ‘Tram Lady’ (no matter what you think of her as a person) by the police state and the state controlled media is just one of the recent examples of the results of speaking up for yourself. She was thrown into prison for expressing her views while at the same time a group of violent Muslim racists who nearly kicked a white girl to death while shouting ‘kill the white slag’ walked free.
Equality and diversity and the ‘so called’ human rights act will in time rob the British people not only of their right to the freedom of expression, but the entirety of their identity.

It goes without saying that to be a nationalist in working education at this point in history is becoming intolerable. How much longer a patriotic and Christian set of ethic’s and morals will allow real teachers to continue working with whining liberals who want to brainwash children with Marxist ideals containing national, patriotic, religious and family hatred. Each day becomes more and more complex for our teachers with more and more propaganda and policies to implement with ideals that they just do not believe in and find morally repugnant

Share this post

Tuesday, 29 May 2012

The Means versus the Ends

Means versus ends

This year is a good year to re-assess your political viewpoint. Across the globe power structures appear to be readying for a change.
One amazing fact of politics is that very few people systematically analyze the question of politics and form their own political inclination to match what they know to be true. Instead, an alarmingly large number of them adopt political viewpoints based on vague emotional associations, social groups, or perceived social status gained from having the “right” opinions (this varies with where and you who are).
As a result, across the spectrum of writers on the right, there has been a re-assessment of what it is to be right-wing. On Amerika, we have presented the simplest possible formulation of rightism: consequentialism, or a concern for ends (results, goals and reality) over means (methods, socialization and how we treat others). The reason for this tendency in rightism is that we believe there is an order to life itself, whether inherent or chosen for its optimal results, that is larger than the individual and the feelings, desires and social impulses of that individual.
In other words, we believe in objective reality. Out there between all of us is a world where dropped rocks always fall, and our actions always have consequences. In fact, these consequences are consistent between similar actions, so we can often predict the results of an action before we even do it. Some even believe that the study of action (means) and consequences (ends) can reveal the nature of our world and universe, much like scientific study or reading history.
On the other side is the left, which is a spectrum of beliefs from anarchism to socialism to communism. They believe that interpersonal relationships, and how we treat others, are most important. That means that it’s better to fail while behaving well than to succeed while behaving badly. What emerges from that statement is that the question of “goal” is removed entirely. To a conservative, the goal of your actions is what determines whether your behavior is good or bad. To a liberal, how you go about achieving your goal is what determines whether your actions are good or bad. The liberal formulation removes an assessment of the goal itself, as if wanting to remove intention entirely from the picture. Conveniently, this enables all goals to be equal, since they are unconsidered. This avoids troublesome separations that mark some people as having far-reaching vision and a responsible outlook, and others as simply passing time with whatever distractions they can muster.
The left will use any adornment to dress up their basic approach. They may say boldly and self-abashedly that it’s better to fail while acting in the “right” way, than to succeed while acting in another way. They may talk about morality, fairness, justice, equality and other pleasant-sounding terms. But at the end of the day, what they are masking is a hostility to goals. If you spend all of your energy of thinking in trying to ensure that your goal is a fair one, and will result in a better situation than another course of action, your methods are for the most part irrelevant. This can be taken too far and result in utter barbarism, but that’s rare, and even so, consider the two cases:

  • Achieving what is necessary through utter barbarism.
  • Not achieving what is necessary.
If those are your two choices, which is logical to choose? Assuming the goal is necessary, the second option is suicidal. Even if it requires barbarism to accomplish a necessary goal, its necessity makes it immoral to consider any option but accomplishing the goal. We frequently encounter this moral question through hypothetical scenarios: if a nuclear bomb is about to go off in a major city, and a bad guy knows where it is, do you torture him to find out where the bomb is so that you can save the people in the city? You either torture him (bad means) or you allow a fusion holocaust (bad ends). Or the question of the zombie outbreak in a small city. If you quarantine the area, you condemn the un-infected people in the city to a horrible death. But if you don’t quarantine, you could lose the entire continent or more. Another option is the runaway train scenario: you are steering a runaway train that is approaching a fork in the road. If you take the left branch, you’ll run over a family of three. If you take the right branch, you’ll run into a tanker car filled with nerve gas that could rupture and wipe out the ten million people. Collateral damage is bad, but creating a situation where the stability of society itself is threatened is much worse.
The means-over-ends calculus will always be more popular. First, it allows people to posture and claim moral superiority. “I would never treat someone that way, no matter what the cost,” they say. Second, it removes the question of goals, and thus makes behavior equally accessible. It takes someone with leadership intelligence to figure out a decent goal, but it takes very little intelligence to apply a series of basic behavioral codes. Third, means-over-ends is paralytic. It means that if any person is injured by a potential act, it cannot be done, since by the means calculus, that act is then immoral. We cannot torture people, create collateral damage or in any way treat people unequally. That eliminates most decisions, which puts society on auto-pilot as we avoid making choices and then accept whatever inertia renders unto us over time.
People don’t like to think this way, because it’s somewhat cold-blooded, but the ends-over-means calculus is the only thought process that works in any situation. You first determine what is the correct goal, which is a type of morality based on results and not methods, and then you apply whatever methods you need to do to get to that goal. This way looks toward the future and considers the whole, lessening the value of the individual but instead avoiding a collapse of social order which affects all individuals.
Smarter people tend to be more emotional and to have a hard-wired need to do the right thing. They are as a result easily subverted by changing “do the right thing” from achieving the right results, to acting in a way that looks as if it’s a result in itself. Which is more moral, achieving a morally necessary goal, or failing to achieve that goal while acting morally on inconsequential methods? If you nobly and honorably avoid torturing a terrorist, and his nuclear bomb vaporizes the whole city, was that a more moral outcome? The West has been subverted by a sleight of hand that holds that a dishonorable result achieved with honor is better than an honorable result achieved through trickery.
We are not the first generation in history to confront this issue. The Odyssey, written thousands of years ago, confronts this question as its underlying theme. Odysseus is forced by necessity to lie, cheat, steal, deceive, murder and even abandon those who are close to him. He must keep his eye on the goal, which is to return home, and ultimately he achieves it. If he used a means-over-ends analysis, he would be lost still. Further, his wife who is beset by suitors also uses an ends-over-means analysis, deceiving these suitors so that she can hold out hope that her husband will return. The Odyssey was passed on through the centuries with this important message. Homer and the wise bards who re-told that epic poem knew that Greeks, like the Europeans to follow, were smarter than average and thus disproportionately susceptible to the sleight-of-hand that replaces honorable ends with dishonorable ends and “honorable” means. As a result, they wove consequentialism throughout the story.
As the people in the West who still have functional minds awaken from the two-thousand year jaunt into a Utopian dream, they are re-discovering this old lesson. If you use a means-over-ends analysis, you will be unable to make long-term decisions or in fact make any decisions until the crisis is upon you. As a result your society will die a “death of a thousand cuts,” with each successive slash draining more of its lifeblood until eventually it collapses. On the other hand, if your civilization re-discovers an ends-over-means analysis, the central question of that civilization becomes the study of what goals are moral, and thus the civilization becomes forward-looking and aims toward optimal choices instead of simply expedient ones.

Monday, 28 May 2012

The Modern Sovietising of Western Civilisation

The Sovietising of the West

By Sarah Maid of Albion
Bernard Hogan-Howe the newly appointed state apparatchik in charge of the London Metropolitan police assures us that “racists” will be “driven out of the police”, whilst revealing that 10 officers are currently under investigation of suspicion of the most heinous thought crime of our age.
Last week, writing in the London Evening Standard, former deputy editor of the Independent and sometime speech writer for Prime Minister David Cameron, Ian Birrell snarled that racist policemen should be “rooted out”, “prosecuted” and “lose their precious pensions”.  Indeed Mr Birrell addressed his subject which such furious, staring eyed, zealotry, that one suspects only fear of exposure prevented him from adding that they should then be transported to some gulag in a remote part of Wales or the Scottish highlands for forced re-education and recreational rock breaking.
Meanwhile a young man still languishes in prison for the offence of sending an ideologically incorrect tweet, whilst the one time captain of the England soccer team, John Terry, awaits prosecution for allegedly calling a black footballer black, Terry has already been stripped of his captaincy, showing when it comes to “racism” an accusation alone is deemed grounds for punishment, whether guilty or not.  
Elsewhere, a young mother is on bail after some informer turned her in via the internet when he expressed an objection to the forced invasion of her homeland.
We are regaled with shocking accounts of racially insensitive words, thoughts and deeds. Nightly ernest young reporters appear on our televisions, usually standing outside courts, police stations or football fields reporting on some politically incorrect quip as if it were equivalent to the napalm  bombing of a hospice.   (Which they probably think it is equivalent to)
Across the Atlantic in America, news channels such as CNN, or “we are Treyvon” as they have probably re-branded themselves by now, have taken to reporting an almost Lewis Carroll style alternative reality where a man’s colour and ethnicity can be changed at the will of a metanarrative (For example Hispanics and Cherokee Indians can suddenly morph into evil white men just to suit an agenda). Meanwhile alleged victims are transformed into angelic twelve year old versions of themselves. All this parallel universe chicanery is performed in an effort to “root out” the very same legendary (white) racist who are being hunted down by Commissioner Hogan-Howe and Ian Birrell over here.
At the same time hugely popular writers and commentators such Pat Buchanan or John Derbyshire who dare to speak truths which must not be spoken are summarily dismissed, pilloried and their livelihoods destroyed.
Of course, we have seen this all before in other times and in other places, where ideological offenders and thought criminals were subjected to show trials and highly publicised prosecutions, then they were called enemies of the state now they are held up as evil, hate fuelled enemies of the multicultural fantasy which has become the obsession of the state. 
Now as then thought criminals must be purged from our institutions and positions of trust, broken, punished and forced to confess and beg a forgiveness, which is seldom if ever granted  
Now as then victims are judged to be offenders and punished for the crimes committed against them. Now, just like then, fake realities are created to act both as parables of the new religion and as truncheons with which the state can batter its terrorised population into acquiescence.
Just as then we are required to pay lip service to an orthodoxy which we do not agree with, which frightens us and which we know to be flawed, and only dare speak our true thoughts to our most trusted friends in hushed tones, and in private.
As happened then, abject failures held together only by state terrorism are presented by an obedient and craven state media as glorious successes, which fool only those who wish to be fooled, but which few, if any, dare challenge.
What we are seeing, in effect is the Sovietisation of the West.
The Sovietisation of the United Kingdom was the subject with Dr Frank Ellis, then a lecturer at Leeds University, before the university attempted but failed to purge him for expressing his disobedient views, addressed in 2001 following the release of that most Stalinist and  Orwellian of documents The Macpherson report into the murder of Stephen Lawrence.
In his outstanding analysis of the report, Frank Ellis exposed the agenda driven fanaticism and false reality which influenced the Macpherson inquiry and its recommendations. and detailed how its purported attempts to combat racism were in reality an outright, and so far successful, attack the existing British society, its native people and our culture.
As Frank Ellis says: “The near unanimous acceptance of its [the report's] assumptions and conclusions by the Labour government represents a major victory for those who are striving to undermine long-established British institutions and accomplish the final destruction of the United Kingdom “
When explaining the process of Sovietisation of which the Macpherson report is part, Dr Ellis describes the fate of the Kulaks, the middle class Russian peasants who Stalin sought to exterminate, and who, as a result, died in their millions.  On reading this I then suggested that we the white race were being set up as the Kulaks of the 21st Century, and Frank told me that Jared Taylor of American Renaissance had also reached that exact same conclusion.
I leave it to you to make your own assessment.
Now eleven years on, it is striking quite how relevant Frank’s analysis of the Macpherson report remains today , and how many of Frank’s predictions have come to pass.  Frank’s review of this poisonous document is a very important and valuable resource, which I urge you all to reread and which I hope Nationalist bloggers will link to.
Because of this I have given it pride of place as the first article I have added to a new site which I have set up for Frank’s writings, which can be visited by clicking on the link below:

Sunday, 27 May 2012

Fighting Back in the Culture War

Fighting Back in the Culture War

By David Hamilton

High Culture is attacked as upper-class entertainment or a way the ruling elites achieve hegemony over the masses. The elitist argument is ideological rather than factual because working-class people are not barred from attending concerts. Politeness and good manners are essential but if they pay the fee they are entitled to watch a concert.

The definitions is also inaccurate. What is wrongly described as popular culture is manufactured culture crteated by Corporations to make money from the masses. It is also a means of social control- bread and circuses. It is not really culture but fashion and dissociates young people from their general culture and communities while guiding them to manufactured identities.

Even talented musicians are controlled by record companies by contracts. They are
legally obliged to perform in publicity videos chosen by the Corporation to market them to a particular section of the public. Hollywood action films are aimed at adolescents.

The distinction between traditional and real popular culture is not stark. Schubert and Beethoven used folk songs as motifs and popular culture has used classical influences for melodies and structure. Vaughan Williams is a fine example of the use of traditional folk music in classical works. Contemporary composer Peter Maxwell Davies has written pieces which incorporate or are inspired by folksong or folk melody such as An Orkney Wedding.

Traditional culture has depth: you can penetrate as far as you have the personal depth to do so. It also has a long continuity; Manufactured culture is exemplified by boy and girl bands who are created and marketed to appeal to young people as a commercial arrangement. These fads are engendered by the new Establishment.

When Bill Haley and his Comets first toured Britain in 1957 they were sponsored by the Daily Mirror; David Bowie's first tour in 1973 was also sponsored by a national newspaper.

The Hippy Fashion developed amongst bohemian sects in Haight Ashbury, California, and after a major hit record: “If your Going to San Francisco” by Scott MacKenzie national Chain stores across the west began selling kaftan coats and beads to young people. The phenomenon of “weekend Hippies” or “Ravers” grew up as professional people ceased shaving on a Thursday so they could look like Hippies for the weekend.

The Punk boom which was engineered by Malcolm MacLaren and Vivienne Westwood, from their clothing shop Sex. McLaren promoted a rock band of sneering youths-the Sex Pistols. Elvis Presley had an outstanding singing voice and natural presence but was controlled by his manager Tom Parker.

There is a proliferation of David Beckham clones wondering around in the sort of gear he advertises. I saw a young man in a Rock Bar recently with a Mohican haircut a 1970s fad but Beckham recently had one. These are sometimes described as “sub-cultures” by academics but are deculturation by Corporations and replaced when another money-spinning style appears.

National identity is being broken down into ethnic and sexual identities: not whether one is English, Irish, Scottish or Welsh but whether you are ethnic or gay.

Popular culture is distinct from the manufactured culture which is now called “popular culture”.

The ballads of Robin Hood or Medieval Mystery and Miracle plays with their pageants are examples. These grew out of the churches Corpus Christi Day ceremonies. These were very much produced by the guilds of tradesmen but were communal and not completely top down affairs like manufactured culture. The Music Hall was a popular entertainment but well to do people also attended. The performers were very talented and in complete control of their songs and the audiences.

There is little of Marie Lloyd left but there is of Libby Morris and Wilson, Keppel and Betty are one of the most original acts I have seen. They were not manufactured by Corporations. (1)

The great works of Europe grew from spiritual aspiration which is part of religious observance. Bach and my personal favourites Byrd and Tallis were church organists and imbued Christian spirituality and transformed it into profoundly uplifting music.

Throughout the 60s there were dishonest clergy who took their pay from the Church but tried to undermine it from within. Believing in “The Death of God” and promoting Marxism from the pulpit. John Robinson, The Bishop of Woolwich, dismissed the traditional idea of a “God up there” or “out there” and said God is love. What is love in the abstract?

The Closing of the Church to the public

Those responsible for traditional culture in the churches have retreated into little worlds when they should be welcoming a wider public, not capitulating to our deculturation. Churches and cathedrals' are constantly appealing for money from the public but seem not to encourage people to attend.

Sunday evening services in the Church of England are communion services which deter new worshippers as they cater for communicants. Take the popular service at St. Lawrences Ludlow, which use The Book of Common Prayer. They attract about 70 but held at 8 a.m; the less popular modern service with its average attendance of 17, is at the more social 9a.m. (2)

The clergy, the Synod are not interested in the views of people outside the Church and do little to attract them. They have closed their minds and see everything through the dogma of progressive services. I once remarked to a vicar that I gave up church when they destroyed the service by dropping the King James Bible. He was amazed! They are ideologically convinced that holding services in a vulgar, modern English means people can understand the services. You can not understand communication with God in a simple rational way but achieve a spiritual awareness through sublime language.

I tried to get information on concerts of The Linnaeus Ensemble who were playing at two churches but neither church replied to me despite leaving several messages. I mentioned this to one of the musicians and she explained: “Churches are like that!” Do these people enjoy hosting concerts for empty rooms? My helpers and I have had this difficulty with cathedrals too so we wrote to several and other venues to make a comparison.

Traditional culture is in retreat while manufactured culture is assiduously promoted. We never received a reply from Great St. Mary, Cambridge, Norwich Cathedral, or Gloucester Cathedral.

I attended a concert at Birmingham Conservatoire and was probably the only one in the audience not connected to the College or friend of the performers. Young musicians would gain experience and confidence by playing to a wider selection of the public. I wrote to the head of the Conservatoire but never received a reply. I thoroughly enjoyed the concert which was conducted by Margaret Faultless as a wider audience would have.

Zoe Poyser of Birmingham Conservatoire explained : “ We have a varied output of both public and educational activities that range from those involving students of the Conservatoire as well as external hirers such as Birmingham Philharmonic Orchestra, Birmingham Music Service, Central England Ensemble, Schubert Ensemble, and Birmingham University Symphony Orchestra and so on. Our priority as an educational institution is to provide performance spaces and opportunities for our students, but this sits alongside and in harmony with our existence as a performance facility for hire.”

Art Galleries make great effort to welcome the wider public and offer many opportunities for education. The fabulous National Gallery in Trafalgar square has greeters who will answer any questions put to them by the public and many interesting books on sale as do Galleries of Contemporary Art such as The Tate in London and the The Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in Gateshead. Sarah Wilkinson of the Baltic was very informative: I often recommend that visitors spend some time talking to the Crew (gallery assistants), who have a thorough knowledge of the works on display. They are there to clearly provide an insight into the views and ideas of the artists themselves as well as listen to and discuss the ideas and thoughts of our visitors as well as their own. Many of them are artists themselves which lends an extra dimension to discussions on artistic practice and we know from our comments and audience research that visitors who have used this resource have a richer experience as a result.

The insularity of Church officials

The Director of Music at Gloucester Cathedral said he would look at my email when he had some spare time: I heard no more. This is a great shame because Gloucester is a magnificent Cathedral with most beautiful cloisters and would also benefit from donations from the public. I asked for some information on the continuity of the choir: “I know its on the net but personal views are always more interesting and more engaging. I would quote you and mention the choir.” This was my intention throughout.

Those responsible for publicity do respond to explain how they try to attract audiences as Helen Simms at Gloucester Cathedral did. It is the clergy and directors of music who are insular.

Traditional Culture grows from religion. It is part of our continuity and is inherited from our ancestors, not specially created for our entertainment as a commercial operation. It is an historic continuity and though there are different periods and reactions one against another they occur within a continuous tradition.

Norwich Cathedral choir has impressive continuity. It was founded in 1096 and continues the tradition of choral worship today. It makes broadcasts and recordings and their repertoire is masterpieces of the Renaissance to contemporary by such as John Tavener and James Macmillan.

Yet when we contacted the Cathedral for information on their choir and its history we were ignored despite twice being told the Vice Dean would contact us.

The Reverend of Gonville and Caius, Cambridge replied to my assistant: "I am in no position to generalise about the issues you raise because I have not done any research or studied any academic surveys on the subject. I can only say that most people who come to Caius Chapel find it an intimate, warm and friendly place where people are given support if they look for it, and left in peace to say their prayers if that is what they prefer." That was not my assistant's experience which is a pity because it has a fine chapel and should have a wider audience.

A good example

The Dean of Kings College, Cambridge, was very polite and courteous and explained that he had introduced a welcoming system whereby he and the Chaplain stand at the door to welcome people as they arrive for the service, and to wish them well as they leave. “This didn't happen until relatively recently, and so I'd like to think we'd actually made progress in being warmer. Certainly quite a lot of people have said as much. On the other hand, it also has to be said that the very large congregations we generally get at King's, composed as they are mostly of one-off visitors, do mean that the actual personal contact is pretty limited. It's perhaps also important to remember that the Chapel is a private chapel which serves the community of King's College first and foremost, and so much of the personal contact for which we are primarily responsible happens outside the Chapel itself, in other parts of the College.”

The difference in secular venues

The Three Choirs Festival is not a Cathedral-led event, but organised by a separate independent charitable trust, the Three Choirs Festival Association. It is international rather than English music. Debbie Liggins was very helpful: “We hire the space (along with up to 15 other venues in each City) but with the benefit of 300 years of tradition i.e. the Cathedrals have us in their calendar in perpetuity, though we have to negotiate the terms every year.

The Three Choirs Festival takes place for a 10 day period only and rotates annually between the 3 cities of Hereford, Gloucester & Worcester. Yes, our main concert venue is the Cathedral in each city, but we are more interested in promoting the excellence of the festival with its international reputation than the various venues utilised. Thus we focus on our international soloists, resident symphony orchestra (the Philharmonia Orchestra) and the quality of the artistic programme. We advertise and place editorial in niche choral and classical publications and online event listing sites.” They use promotional material, e-newsletters, press releases.

They cherish the different character that each city gives to the festival, and thus undertake extensive publicity within each city every 3 years while putting on 'fringe' events for the local community.  (3)

Ludlow's excellent, world famous festival makes every effort to reach a wide public. They send-out 40, 000 brochures, have 13, 000 friends on their list and use a professional firm to to distribute them and they have many visitors from abroad.

They stage a Shakespeare play which is very atmospheric as it is put on in Ludlow Castle and, as the sky is darkening, Bats take to the wing and create a eerie atmosphere. This year it is much Ado About Nothing which, regrettably, has been set in WW2 Britain on VE Day.  Changing periods always ruins the play because it changes the associations of the time period.

In response to my The Neglect of English Classical Music Raymond Walker, Chairman Victorian Opera NW wrote: (4)

“May I say how strongly we at Victorian Opera endorse what you are saying. I agree with all you say about the composers mentioned. How could it be that the Cheltenham Festival did not give the premiere of Holst's Cotswold Symphony and that a Danish CD label Classico provided the first hearing of this symphony. And how dare a director Michael Berkeley promote his own work when he should be acting as an impartial director of the Festival. 2008 saw Balfe's bi-centenary yet nothing was given by R3. When last September RTE broadcasted a rare performance of Balfe's Falstaff 1838 the BBC wouldn't relay it even though it would have cost them nothing in royalties. We have just recorded W V Wallace's 'Lurline' 1860, a superb work, in readiness for his bi-centenary in 2012. Will Wexford or Buxton pick up a Wallace opera to perform? I doubt it without a deliberate shake up. I am disheartened by the fact that licence payers cannot get R3 to promote a wider coverage of classical music instead of pushing atonal and serial music that very few enjoy listening to.”

It is important to save English Music that is stuck in attics and garages and record it. The Daily Telegraph of 26 April 2004 had a feature on John Foulds when Birmingham Symphony Orchestra released their recording of "Dynamic Tryptich." Malcolm MacDonald, editor of music magazine Tempo: "There's no question he was a genius and one of the most significant English composers of the last century. MacDonald, found some scores in the British Library: "I got out a dozen pieces, and the first thing I opened was the Dynamic Triptych. I was blown away by it. This was music unlike any British composer of the time. I was amazed it was lying around, and no one was playing it.

"Foulds's daughter " took me to the garage, where there were two coffin-sized boxes full of sketches and manuscripts she's been left by her mother." Unfortunately, many of the manuscripts were damaged by rats and ants. In his book "Music Today" Foulds's, explained how, by strict diet and meditation, he had developed his clairvoyant and clairaudiant abilities. Much of his music, he claimed, was dictated to him by spirits."

Some of the greatest modern English music has been popular. Elgar, Tippett and Britten were very well received.

One who is keen to promote traditional music is Em Marshall founder of The English Music Festival and EM Records. I asked her why so many guardians of classical music looked inwards rather than outwards to a wider audience: She told me: “I suppose that maybe they feel it is "safer" keeping their concerts amongst a dedicated audience whom they know approve of the music, rather than opening it up to the general public, where they might experience more criticism? I don't really know - that's only a possible thought! Clearly if traditional music is going to survive it HAS to be opened up to as many people as possible - and it is unfair and narrow-minded to keep it from anyone who might want to listen. We are now publishing scores to make this music accessible to artists as well as making our own DVDs.” (5)

The common trait is that religious venues have become insular and cater only for themselves yet they are as a spine running through our national history and vital to the nation as a whole. When I was researching in St. Lawrence's, Ludlow, an orchestra was practicing for a concert. There was a stall for refreshments but “Brian” refused me a cup of tea! Perhaps I was not one of the club!

We have churches and cathedrals from those of accepted beauty and majesty to the eccentric as in Chesterfields twisted spire and these are repositories of our history as well as culture and should again be the centre of our communities.

It is my view that they should open up to the general public by advertising and putting on refreshments to perpetuate our culture not allow the forces of decadence to go unchallenged. Colleges of Education have a responsibility to do so because they are funded by taxpayers money. This could be done without cheapening the music by lowering standards, people must lift themselves up. Religion is the fount of culture and the clergy and directors of music have a duty to perpetuate that. Churches and cathedrals are spines of continuity through our national existence.



(3) Peter Hitchins.The Abolition of Britain.1999. PP 105-135



(6) The next English Music festival is (1-5 June 2012)

Saturday, 26 May 2012

Downfall A Story of Civilisation


The world is changing. We are slowly reversing two thousand years of decline.
Like most decline, ours has not been absolute. It happens in stops and starts, in little increments, working inward from the details. It’s like getting the flu during a busy work week: on Monday, you sneeze (once). Tuesday the eyes water. Wednesday morning you feel a little off, but have a sudden burst of energy. Wednesday afternoon it looks like a cold. Thursday you’re a wreck.
Despite the relative density of most people, more and more of the people who make crucial decisions are noticing that a wrong turn occurred in the past. When you take a wrong turn, you re-trace your steps and go back to where you made the wrong decision, and then fix it, preferably without undoing anything positive you’ve done since that time.
We live in a society of people drugged on the progressive vision that says greater year numbers and greater permissiveness go hand-in-hand and mean that we’re getting somewhere. These will try to tell you that changing anything we do to a version from the past is a defeat, but they’ve obviously never trailblazed any woods. When you take the wrong course, the sooner you fix it and get back to the old course, the more you win.
Decline is universal to civilization. Without civilization, it does not occur; however, without civilization, a lot of great things do not occur as well. Some want us to un-do civilization and go back to anarchy or primitive existences. That’s neat, but it represents a denial of potential in us. Technology is not per se bad, but in the hands of a dying civilization, it’s misused — just like every other tool of that society is misused.
Neither is civilization bad, except that it raises the stakes. Decisions no longer occur on an individual basis with immediate consequences, but on a demographic basis, where all decisions affect others and in turn shape the filter that determines who will be part of that civilization. Most people have trouble thinking in this mode. Leaders tend to think in terms of standards of behavior, precedents and abstract values. People with no leadership ability tend to think in tangibles, immediates and sensations including emotions.
As a civilization grows, it either becomes successful or gets downgraded to a lesser type of civilization. For example, third world civilizations give up on most of the benefits of organized society, forming instead loosely-associated markets with mafia-style leadership. A step up from that is the classic first-world civilization, which is ruled by laws and roles, by values and mores, instead of ad hoc by strongmen and witch-hunts. At any time, a civilization can go back down that ladder. The third world isn’t a place, it’s a state of mind.
Civilization types are like mathematical formulas. With greater complexity come greater obligations, but also greater opportunities. When you change the formula, the output changes. They have plateaus however because certain types of equations have about the same degree of complexity. If your civilization is a one-variable civilization, you have mud huts, rudimentary farming and ad hoc dictators; with two variables, you have seasonal farming, open markets and a network of local oligarchs; with three variables, you might have a liberal democracy with highly codified laws.
When civilizations move up the ladder, they gain certain advantages for their citizens. The more complex the society, the more indirect these are. It’s hard for example to put a personal value on safe streets, clean water, or well-designed public spaces if you have never known the lack of them. Where in a simpler society, benefits come directly such as spoils of war or an abundant harvest, in a complex society the target is the myriad details that need to be organized to make civilization as a whole a pleasing experience conducive to productivity. Productivity allows the civilization to be wealthy, but more importantly, allows its citizens to accomplish individual goals above and beyond the minimum necessary for survival. Upward civilizations aim to improve on the level of this amorphous and abstract concept, while civilizations beneath them can’t yet conceptualize it and so focus on tangibles.
When a civilization starts to decline, it begins by overpopulating and taking that higher standard for granted. Overpopulation comes about because the innovations created by the best, like political stability, legal systems, hygiene, medicine, regular food and organized public life in turn tend to allow people to survive from infancy at greater rates. This is excellent news, except that the lowest people by ability in a society are incapable of adjusting their breeding rate to match the new lifespan expectations. As a result, the society becomes bottom-heavy with lots of followers and too few leaders. This enables the followers to unite and to demand the sorts of direct benefits one expects in a lower order of civilization (share the booty).
That causes civilization to gear itself toward taking for granted all that it has achieved, and to stop aiming for anything higher than a “facilitative society” that empowers individuals to seek personal wealth and hobbies. Such a society does not strive for unity and sees any kind of agreement as oppression. It is only happy when each person is moving in their own direction, making agreement on values impossible, and thus immersing the society in a constant leadership by committee which is both conservative in that it is resistant to change, and liberal in that the one change it will always permit is greater independence for the individual from any standard, objective, or values system.
Civilizations in decline are in such a race to the bottom. The goal is no longer to build complex ideas or goals, but to take what exists and divide it into small pieces so it becomes popular with the greatest number of people in the constituency. This in turn forces all truths through a kind of sieve that eliminates the connection between details, leaving only linear material assertions. At this point, any potential for leadership is fully destroyed. The politicians pander to the citizens, who depend on the media-entertainment elites to inform them, but that group in turn finds out what to inform about by watching the citizens. The circularity acts like a feedback loop, amplifying trends and fears but obliterating any larger framework of values.
This decline potential is inherent to all civilizations. Thanks to the technological prowess of ours, we have formed a worldwide empire from modern society, which is composed of:

  • Liberal democracy: any system in which voting, popularity and consumer purchases determine what is important, instead of some objective standard like “is this realistic?”
  • Welfare/Nanny state: to make citizens docile, make them dependent on benefits, and then manipulate them to do things in their “own best interests,” which in turn allows the society to make decisions for them. While this is necessary to a degree for most people, it quickly becomes an excuse to standardize people to the role that is convenient for government and business to have them serve.
  • Technology and Progress: as a religion, we have the idea that with each passing day we are learning more about technology, and thus moving toward a more knowledgeable state; parallel to that, we think we are also learning a state of moral enlightenment which brings our society closer to a Utopian goal of pacifism, egalitarianism, altruism and uniformity of goal.
  • Social reality: a decentralized control system by which people pass along sayings, memes, trends, fads, phases and other emulated behaviors. These enable those in power to leak out a single instance and have people then enforce that idea on each other.
  • Consumerism and Media: with nothing in common but commerce, societies become wealth-acquisition endgames. To this end, business takes over from all other life-processes of a society. To support that, media arises as much for advertising or news. This then ends up constructing a symbolic reality that most people follow, even when it clashes with reality as they can immediately perceive and verify.
These are symptoms of end stage civilizations. Modern society is a worldwide civilization that is entering its end-stage. It is sad that this happens as our technology reaches new peaks, but because civilization decline is a disease of prosperity, and technology requires prosperity to fund its development, it is not wholly unexpected. It takes many centuries for a civilization to go through the decay process.
In 1789, the West officially committed itself to decline by adopting liberalism. In 2009, it became clear that the policies of liberalism had not only failed, despite us applying band-aids during the Great Depression, but inevitably would fail because the goal of liberalism is to take from the productive and use that to subsidize and level the population for egalitarian (social) goals. Since the industrial revolution, many band-aids have been applied to keep this system afloat. It is failing by design, and people are now seeing its failings as inherent to its design, and not as flaws of implementation.
Interestingly Europe and the United States have different angles on this issue. The United States, while on the surface a more consumerist society, harbors a vast conservative sentiment arising from its practicality. Americans like end results, and they have now seen 70 years of liberalism do nothing but shatter families, leave people lonely, sabotage economies, destroy cities, etc. Europeans are on the surface closer to a sense of nationalism and thus of culture, but they have more deeply imbibed the virus of liberalism, and therefore even when they think they’re being anti-liberal, they tend to inject liberal ideas into that initiative and thus completely sabotage it before it even gets started.
What is dying right now is a worldwide civilization that has lost legitimacy because its inherent design flaws increase human misery. In contrast, conservatism increases human joy at the expense of giving up some “freedoms” that lead to terrible outcomes. The one accusation liberalism can make against conservatism is that liberalism allows the individual more choices. However, more choices are meaningless in a collapsing globalist regime based equally on leftist welfare policy and rightist market social Darwinism. The only rational third way is conservatism, which insists that a principle and concern for end results must come before considerations of method such as markets, popularity and democracy.
A time of great instability approaches. This is not alarming, because all transitions are unstable. Many people are alarmed because they have a lack of imagination about what could replace liberal democracy, in part because they have absorbed the government-media-social propaganda against monarchy, religion, culture, ethnocultural nationalism and a naturalistic reverence for the order of the cosmos. There is no point bemoaning these people, or despairing of the time we are in. Its basis is illogical and therefore it is failing, not from external enemies but from within. This failure affects Europe, Asia and America because they are all part of the same type of society design, which is the modern society. Where some see sadness in this, it is wiser to see opportunity. An old and now irrelevant order dies, and is replaced slowly but with increasing momentum by a fix to our wrong turn centuries ago.
Right now the knowledge of this change and any approval of it constitutes heresy and dissent to the society around us. The greatest threat are our fellow citizens, who have been told that anything but the current way is equal to oppression and the taking of their freedom. However, even these change, as they see that the people who possess leadership intelligence are OK with this change.
After two millennia of a downward curve, we finally have a chance to soar.

The Queen's New and Tiny Model Army

Toy Soldiers 120 x 90Well I do not know what the weather is like where you are, but here in South Wales the sun is shining and it looks like it's going to be a scorcher.  Considering I have spent a large part of my life overseas you would think I love the sun, but no.  For some reason I like rain and stormy nights, especially if at sea, but at least the warm weather will make the nights more bearable for our former soldiers who have been forced to live on the streets of our cities by an uncaring government and nation.
But eventually winter will return, but meanwhile, squirrels are off doing what squirrels do, which is squirreling away their nuts (lol), and old age pensioners taking advantage of the warm weather will be squirreling away their pre-payment electricity and gas tokens in the hope they will have enough hoarded away to survive the next winter, instead of dying, which is what the government would prefer, now that they are no longer efficient producers and consumers.
And wasn't the weather beautiful for the Big Parade of thousands of the mercenary troops of the New World Order in front of our traitor puppet Queen who smiled and waved at what remains of the British Army, now known simply as "The Army" - British being dropped quite some time back - marched past the richest woman and biggest landowner in the world.
Well you know my opinion of the Queen and the kind of Land Reform I would like to see and if perhaps if the British People knew the truth about this trout faced old cow and how she has betrayed them, they might also actually be calling for her abdication if not her head on a pike, instead of lining the roads to wave their government issued plastic flags as she rides by in her coach of gold waving to them, whilst her old goat Phillip (who for some reason I do like), oggles all the cuties in the crowd.
Now as nationalists - according to research the most informed political people in the country - you know the truth about the treason of the Queen and how she has remained silent about the enslavement of her "subjects" to Zionism and the planned genocide of the white race but regrettably our fellow "subjects" do not.
According to a recent survey (if you believe them) over 80% of the people questioned, support our corrupt and evil monarchy.  I despair, I truly do.
Earlier this month, the traitor Queen presented new Colours to one of our nation's oldest regiments and very pretty the whole affair looked, but behind the scenes our equally treasonous government was making plans to abolish one of the most operationally experienced units in our armed forces, the 1st Queen's Dragoon Guards(QDG) also known as "The Welsh Cavalry".
For the traitors who stamp on our faces daily, the 324 years of that regiments proud history means nothing and so the QDG will go the same way as when the 303 year old history of the Royal Welch Fusiliers was thrown in the bin and their colours taken off to to be hung from some chapel wall.
Our filthy government, led by the descendant of Moses, cares only about money.
They are going to slash our army down to just 82,000 men and replace them in the frontline of their illegal wars, with soldiers from an expanded Territorial Army - in the same way they replaced real police officers with the plastic and community police officers, in order to save money for them to donate to other countries or steal in illegal expenses.
No person of a sane mind should be encouraging young men in their families to join either the NWO mercenary Army or its cheaper replacement, the Territorials, unless of course they think their son would look nice in a body bag or wheelchair.

Friday, 25 May 2012

Welcome to Eurabia

Welcome to Eurabia

Op-ed: As Muslim population mushrooms, we may be seeing last days of Europe as we know it
Giulio Meotti

We are living through the self-extinction of the European civilization that shaped the age we live in. In his new bestselling book “Civilization,” renowned Harvard historian Niall Ferguson writes: “If the Muslim population of the UK were to continue growing at an annual rate of 6.7% (as it did between 2004 and 2008,) its share of the total UK population would rise from just under 4% in 2008 to 8% in 2020, to 15% in 2030 and to 28% in 2040, finally passing 50%in 2050.”

Ferguson is not alone in using the term “Eurabia” to describe an Islamicized, senescent European continent. Historian Bat Ye'or spent her career studying the phenomenon and Professor Bernard Lewis told German daily Die Welt that “Europe will have Muslim majorities at the latest by the end of the 21st Century.”
The global number of Muslims is expected to jump by 35% in the next 20 years, growing twice as fast as the non-Muslim population, according not to these “Eurabia mongers,” but to the famous US Pew Forum, which published projections Muslim population growth between 2010 and 2030.
The most frightening figures are in Europe. Some of the biggest increases in Europe’s Muslim population in absolute numbers over the next 20 years are expected to occur in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Germany. The Muslim populations in Italy and Sweden are projected to “more than double in size.” Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, President of the Italian Episcopal Conference, warned about Italy’s “slow demographic suicide” and Italian Father Piero Gheddo, a doyen of Vatican’s missionaries, warned that "Europe will be dominated by Islam in the space of a few generations."
A low European fertility rate, massive immigration from Muslim countries and a confident Islamist minority are turning the cradle of Western civilization into its grave. As historian Walter Laqueur has warned, these are “the last days of Europe.”

Losing precious gifts

All over Europe, the number of births has dropped in comparison to the number of deaths year after year. For a stable population a nation needs a fertility rate of 2.1 live births per woman. That’s roughly the case in what America. Israel has a significant 2.6 rate. Meanwhile, Italy shows one of the world’s lowest levels of fertility: 1.3. Canadian journalist Mark Steyn, author of “America Alone,” has warned that at the end of the 21st Century there may “still be a geographical area on the map marked as Italy,” but this will “merely be designation for real estate.”

While, Austria was 90% Catholic in the 20th Century, Islam could make up the majority religion among Austrians under 15 years of age by 2050, says American journalist Christopher Caldwel. In the four largest cities of the Netherlands – Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague and Utrecht – Mohammed, with the variations of Mohamed and Muhammad, is the leading name among newborns. The same is true for the European Union’s capital, Brussels.
Elsewhere, only 3.2% of Spain’s population was foreign-born in 1998. Now it’s more than 15%. According to the Pew Forum, France’s Muslim population will increase from the current 4.7 million to 6.9 million in 2030. Indeed, demography is changing all European cities: The populations of Amsterdam, Brussels and Marseille is between 20 and 25% of Muslim; Birmingham, Cologne, Copenhagen, London, Paris, Rotterdam, Stockholm, Strasbourg and The Hague are between 10 and 20% Muslim; Berlin, Hamburg and Vienna are between 5 and 10%.
The problem is that the fastest-breeding demographic group in Europe is also the most religious and the one most resistant to the pieties of a liberal democracy. It’s not difficult to imagine how this confrontation between a European atheistic apathy and an Islamist theological turmoil will end.
The Muslim Brotherhood runs most European mosques. Its front groups are courted by Western governments and media. Europe is one of their priorities. They call it “dar al shaadi”, the land of mission. Yusuf al Qaradawi, the most famous guru of the Brotherhood, spoke clearly: “Islam will return to Europe, not by the sword, but with proselytism.”
Europe risks losing all its precious gifts: Human dignity, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, freedom of expression, rule of law, separation of state and mosque. Across Europe there are dozens of journalists, cartoonists and writers who are living under terrorist threats.
The latest WikiLeaks files revealed that at least 35 Guantanamo terrorists were radicalized in London mosques before being sent to fight the West.In the UK there are 80 sharia courts operating like a legal apartheid within common law. These courts are based on the rejection of the principle of inviolability of human rights. The courts formalize the “talaq,” the repudiation of the wife by the husband, polygamy, the right to “rebuke” the wives and the prevention of intermarriages.

Jews a barometer of tolerance

Holland - with all of its rules against discrimination - is already a segregated society. The biggest mosques in Europe frame the vibrant green, luxuriant, wooded, watery Dutch countryside. At the Zuidplein Theatre, one of the most prestigious in Rotterdam, an entire balcony was reserved for Muslim women. This is not happening in Pakistan or Saudi Arabia, but in the city where the Founding Fathers set out for the United States.

The Economist, a publication far from anti-Islamic ideas, spoke of Rotterdam as a “Eurabian nightmare.” This nightmare is threatening the Jews too. Anti-Semitism in Western Europe last year was “the worst since World War II", according to the Jewish Agency. It will only worsen in the future. Books such as Mein Kampf and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are prominently displayed bestsellers in Muslim stores on Edgware Road in the heart of London.
Let's not forget Ilan Halimi, a young Jewish man from Paris, kidnapped and tortured without anyone intervening in the surrounding apartments of the housing projects from. Residents heard Halimi’s screams but didn’t say a word.
In Sweden, a country described by The Guardian as “the greatest success the world has known,” Jews are leaving large cities such as Malmo due to security reasons and anti-Semitic attacks. Dutch liberal guru Frits Bolkestein just sparked an uproar in the Netherlands by saying that Jews have “no future here and should immigrate to the US or Israel.”
The famous Holland of Baruch Spinoza, the shelter of the Spanish and Portuguese Jews who fled the Inquisition, is making way for a realm of fear, intimidation and subjugation. Jews are also fleeing Antwerp, the city once proudly called “the Northern Jerusalem.”
Anti-Semitism is an eruption of barbarism into our civilization and the Jews have always been a barometer of tolerance. When the Jews will be gone from Amsterdam and Antwerp, nothing will be the same in Europe. We should not be surprised if one day, under the Eurabian banner, these new Europeans will try to expel the descendants of the Holocaust from the land of Israel. This second Shoah will be called "Peace and Justice for Palestine."
Giulio Meotti, a journalist with Il Foglio, is the author of the book A New Shoah: The Untold Story of Israel's Victims of Terrorism  

Tuesday, 22 May 2012

WHY NOT ISLAM by Dr Alan C Clifford

WHY NOT ISLAM - Dr Alan C Clifford

Too many churchmen as well as politicians are gripped by cowardice in
the face the Muslim menace. One fears that the oft-stated ‘clash of
civilisations’ will inevitably erupt with violence on British streets when
expected demographic predictions reach a critical point. Irrespective of
the naive incompetence of ‘PC’ government policies, it is the amazing
and long-suffering tolerance of British people that keeps a lid on such
terrible possibilities. But for how much longer?

As a Christian pastor, I pursue a mission which seeks the conversion of
Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Religiously and politically, I desire
compassion for all and malice towards none. Whether people follow the
dictates of a false religion like Islam or they prefer the decadent life-style
of much modern British secularism, all need the life-transforming
message of our Lord Jesus Christ. That said, our long-overdue recovery
of authentic Christianity must be matched by an informed rejection of
Islam. My case is as follows:

It is undeniable that Islam’s global jihadists - some quietly, others violently - are
plotting the overthrow of all we have known for centuries. They are preparing for
‘USAistan’, ‘EUropeistan’ and ‘UKistan’ in no uncertain terms! Tragically, our
secularist Governments - which Islam aims to subjugate and replace in any case - are
playing dangerous games by ignorantly distinguishing between militant and moderate
Islam. The only difference between moderates and militants is between those who
keep their mouths shut and those who don’t! Western Governments and other
secularists are deluded by the deceptive mantra ‘Islam means peace’ (reinforced by
the early, pre-abbrogated Sura 2: 256 and the frequently misquoted Sura 5: 32). But it
means nothing of the kind! The Arabic word for ‘peace’ is ‘salaam’, the Hebrew
equivalent being ‘shalom’. No, ‘Islam’ means ‘submission’, submission to Allah. The
only sense in which the Pax Islama could mean ‘peace’ is when tribute-paying non-
Muslims are silenced by conquest and reduced to a state of dhimminitude or ‘second
class’ citizenship. To properly use Sir Iqbal Sacranie’s deceptive expression (used to
shield Islam from its critics after 7/7) ‘the Qur’an is perfectly clear’, it states: ‘Make
war on them: ... Fight those who believe not in Allah ... Nor acknowledge the religion
of Truth, (even if they are of the People of the Book, i.e. Jews and Christians), until
they pay the jizyah with submission, and are utterly subdued’ (Sura 9: 14, 29).

Yes, you have read it correctly. Muslims are not really Muslims. They are properly
called ‘Muhammadans’ - followers of their prophet Muhammad. The god they claim
to submit to (the true meaning of ‘Islam’) is in reality the ancient pagan moon god of
Arabia. For all their protestations against ‘idolatry’, their crescent moon symbol of
Allah may be seen on every mosque. This imagined god is not to be confused with the
living God who has uniquely revealed Himself in Jesus Christ. Since Muslims reject
the true God, only acknowledged by true Christians, Christians alone are truly
‘islamic’ since they alone submit to God! Invoking an absurd piece of Islamic
rhetoric, the Lord Jesus Christ was only a ‘muslim’ in the sense that He, as the Son of
God, submitted Himself to the will of His heavenly Father. While Jesus may be
regarded as a ‘muslim’ in this sense, Muslims are arguably not Muslims because they
fail to submit to the living God! Their hostility to God in Christ makes them strictly

So, Muslims need rescuing from Islam! At the same time, the West needs rescuing
from Islam! To implement this twin rescue mission, two directives must be pursued:

1. Reliable information must be made available to community, educational, church
and political leaders about authentic Islam. The loveless concept of Allah; the
incoherence of the Qur’an; Islam’s appeal to the baser instincts of human nature; the
degradation of women involving female circumcision and forced marriages; honour
killings; the killing of apostates, its bloody jihadism and a fallaciously-promised
erotic paradise for suicide bombers (murderers not martyrs); all these features must
not be hidden. In responding to the growing threat, Western Governments are failing
to face reality. The distinction between moderate and militant Islam misses the point
that the religion itself is the source of the problem. Indeed, no other religion on earth
can claim to match the violence of the Islamic agenda. Seemingly-benign Muslim
communities will always be breeding grounds from which their more militant
members can recruit jihadists.

2. With sensitive yet courageous compassion, Christians must use all proper means to
evangelise Muslims. In the process, there must be no concessions to liberal as well as
Muslim denials of the deity and grace of Jesus Christ, the Son of God and only
Saviour of the world. In short, the case for the pure, life-transforming faith of biblical
Christianity must be courageously made. On the religious education level, the RE
component of National Curricula must ‘put the record straight’. Teachers must stop
pretending that Jesus and Muhammad are on a par and that the Holy Bible and the
Holy Qur’an teach similarly-positive values. Without denying that too often
Christians have failed to demonstrate the compassionate virtues of its Founder, the
true character of Muhammad’s programme and its devastating dictates must not be
hidden from our children. Yes, the Christian Gospel forbids and condemns hatred and
violence. The same cannot be said of the message of Muhammad. The children of
Western schools must learn the difference between the mercy of the Sermon on the
Mount and the hatred of the Hadith. The children of Muslim citizens must also be
exposed to the purity of Christ and not the poison of Muhammad.

With a continuing and growing assault on our Christian heritage, never was there a
greater need to get to grips with the truth of the Bible text: “No man ever spoke like
this man” (John 7: 46). This was the response of amazed men who heard Christ. What
truths explain their astonishment?

And why? He was no ordinary man. He was perfect and sinless. He is the ‘God-man’
(Matthew 1: 23); ‘God manifest in the flesh’ (1 Timothy 3: 16); the Eternal ‘Word
made flesh’ (John 1: 14).

Thus, He spoke words of truth, purity, love, kindness and compassion. He spoke with
divine unction, grace and authority. No one else, before or since, ever spoke like Him.
He is Creator, King, and Lord of the Universe.

On the other hand, Muhammad was an ordinary man. He was imperfect and sinful.
He spoke words of error, impurity, hate and cruelty.

His life backed up His words. In lip and life, He was perfectly consistent. He brought
blessing, healing, comfort and joy to people. His many miracles confirmed His deity.
His tender touch declared the compassion of God. He liberated women from the
abusive treatment of selfish men. He rejected violence as a method of spreading His
message. No life has ever been lived to match the life of Jesus Christ.

On the other hand, Muhammad's life contradicted many of his more noble sayings.
His life is not a good example for ‘private character’. His claims cannot compare
with Christ’s. Spreading his message by the sword, he brought violence and
bloodshed to those who refused to submit to his ‘Allah’. He humiliated women. His
tenderness was reserved chiefly for his own sexual indulgence and his stomach
(according to wife - one of fourteen - A’isha).

While His life and preaching angered the religious establishment of His day, nothing
could justify the hatred directed at Him. He was guilty of no sin. Expressing God’s
mercy to us hell-deserving sinners, Jesus, Saviour of the world, died for our sins.
He died, ‘the just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God’ (1 Peter 3: 18). In His
agonizing crucifixion, He breathed nothing but love and kindness to His enemies.
Such dying! Such love!

On the other hand, Muhammad died, burdened by his own guilt. Sadly and tragically,
his death did not terminate his cruel conquests. Others perpetuated his vicious legacy.

His impact on history is not just the effect of a perpetuation of His memory. Jesus
rose from the dead! He lives! The Gospel is the greatest blessing the world has ever
known! It has brought forgiveness, love, joy and peace. Christ has mended broken
hearts and lives. He has given hope to those in despair. Through Him, the light of
heaven has dispelled the darkness of death.

He has liberated individuals and nations. The Gospel has delivered people from
ignorance, slavery, poverty and degradation. All that is truly good, noble, pure and
beautiful comes from Him (even if apostate believers - crusading Roman Catholics
and deity-denying Protestant Liberals - have corrupted His truth). Christ’s
resurrection influence continues still where He is accepted, trusted and served.

On the other hand, Muhammad died, to rise no more, except to be judged by Christ
when He returns. His tomb is not empty. His legacy is ignorance, cruelty, fear and
oppression. The continued influence of his teachings is a threat to all that Christ

In conclusion, the case for Christ and against Muhammad is compelling in every
respect. Assessed by every test that may be devised, there is simply no competition.
So let us all respond as did the men in our text! May we all acknowledge, believe,
trust, love and surrender to the incomparable Christ. May we all rejoice in Him, and
seek to make Him known throughout the world.

I am well aware that many in the secular West desire Christ no more than they desire
Muhammad. Therefore, I must warn them. Even if they never suffer from some
jihadic atrocity, they will stand before the judgement seat of Christ, when He returns
to judge the world in righteousness (see 2 Corinthians 5: 10).

While opportunity remains, come to Christ! If you are a Muslim, renounce
Muhammad, and come to Christ! Then, everything I have tried to express will become
wonderfully and experientially true. I invite you all to trust and serve Him with me.

Dr Alan C. Clifford
Norwich Reformed Church