Search This Blog

Tuesday, 31 May 2011

Dr Satoshi Kanazawa, his Research and the Call for his Dismissal. fron the LSE

Dr Satoshi Kanazawa, his Research and the Call for his Dismissal. PDF Print E-mail
Written by Frank Ellis   
london-school-of-economics signFrom: Dr Frank Ellis
To: Professor Rees, London School of Economics (LSE) v.mizgailo@lse.ac.uk
Date: 27th May 2011 AD
Re: Dr Satoshi Kanazawa, his Research and the Call for his Dismissal.

The quality of arguments deployed against Dr Satoshi Kanazawa for his article on the theme of black female attractiveness does not inspire confidence in the intellectual calibre of the authors. I suppose this is just one consequence of applying a policy of affirmative action for students and faculty who do not have to meet the same standards as whites. Too many black students and faculty do not seem to grasp the abstract concept of free speech and the role of academic freedom in the pursuit of truth and the eradication of error. Black hostility to free speech and academic freedom is not surprising, since blacks have shown themselves to be quite incapable of creating advanced societies or sustaining any kind of intellectual milieu in which the right to dissent is enshrined in law and custom. At times we whites find it a strain in dealing with white dissenters: for blacks with their generally less developed capacity for abstract thinking it is an impossible burden.
Unable to grasp the abstract nature of free speech and its essential role in scientific and technological progress blacks perceive the exercise of free speech by non-blacks, especially as it concerns the discussion of low mean black IQ, black educational failure, appalling levels of black crime in First and Third World states, incompetence, unbelievable savagery and the pitiful state of sub-Saharan Africa and, of course, Islamic terrorism, as racism. This is always at all times, in all places, the default position for blacks and their white manipulators when confronted with evidence of black failure. This is the reason that blacks, encouraged by whites who should know better, are attacking Dr Satoshi Kanazawa and demanding he be sacked. I have read articles by Dr Satoshi Kanazawa and I have found them to be well researched, clearly written and very interesting.

Despite all the accusations of “scientific racism” and the associations of Kanazawa’s research with Jim Crow, Apartheid, the Holocaust and the slave trade, the genetic, psychometric and historical data demonstrate beyond any reasonable doubt that the mean intellectual and cultural achievements of blacks are way below those of whites. The only conclusion – and it is not a happy one for blacks and their white, xenophiliac manipulators – is that intellectually and culturally blacks are, as judged by the objective, unforgiving measure of achievements, not by sentimental, emotional, ad hoc evasions and multicultural propaganda, inferior to whites, Jews and north-east Asians. Denouncing Kanazawa as some version of a racist does nothing to change this state of affairs. It merely encourages blacks and their white manipulators always to scream racism when unpleasant truths emerge or are posited.

Behind the public debate of this matter I have no doubt that the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has already demanded that LSE take some form of action against Dr Satoshi Kanazawa. In the first instance this will mean that Dr Kanazawa is expected to withdraw his research and issue a suitably grovelling apology. I can only hope that Dr Kanazawa will resist any such demand. He has said or written nothing for which he should apologise.

In the event that Dr Kanazawa refuses to grovel the EHRC will threaten LSE with a diversity audit, arguing that by failing to take action against Dr Kanazawa, the LSE is violating its obligations under the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000. At this stage, in order to propitiate blacks, their white manipulators and to remove the threat of a diversity audit, the LSE will move to suspend Dr Kanazawa and seek to secure his dismissal through an internal hearing. As far as LSE is concerned, this has the advantage of immediately reducing the negative publicity for LSE and creates the impression that LSE has responded in a politically correct manner to the clamour of so-called anti-racists. The threat by EHRC to carry out a diversity audit will be made behind the scenes so as to avoid the impression that LSE is being placed under any pressure to act from outside the institution. I urge LSE to stand up to the bullies, the ignorant, the plain gullible and above all the viciously anti-white racist EHRC.

In 2006, when teaching at Leeds University, I was subjected to the same sort of treatment when I highlighted the complete failure of multiculturalism. I was profoundly shocked by the despicable cowardice of administrators and faculty members. I argued then, and I argue now, that for all the words in their charters on academic freedom and free speech, universities on the themes of multiculturalism, feminism, non-white immigration, race and IQ are craven and corrupt. I hope that LSE proves me wrong. For all the unpleasantness, I nevertheless learned a great deal. Be advised that should LSE succumb to the temptation to suspend Dr Kanazawa and initiate an internal hearing with the aim of securing his dismissal, I and others shall contact Dr Kanazawa and offer our experience and services as witnesses for the defence. Please, do the decent thing and reject the mob and the hideous EHRC and all its works.

Yours sincerely

Frank Ellis

Broke Britain Leads the World (in Giving Away Money)

Britain Leads the World (in Giving Away Money)

The ConDems gave away a record £8.5 billion in foreign aid in 2010, making Britain the most proportionally generous country in the world, and the total is set to rise year on year.
Britain gave the highest percentage of any country’s GDP to foreign lands, sticking rigorously to a misguided six-year-old G8 pledge to throw 0.7 per cent of taxpayers’ money away by 2013, a promise other countries seem to have long since forgotten.
The British foreign aid bill is set to rise year after year, reaching an estimated £12 billion by 2014.
In fact, Britain is donating double the G8 average foreign aid contribution, spending 0.56 per cent of GDP compared to the 0.28 per cent norm.
Compared with the other G8 countries, Britain spends £600 million more than France, £700 million more than Germany, £1.7 billion more than Japan and £4.4 billion more than Canada, Italy and Russia combined. Only the United States gives away more, £18.5 billion; however, that accounts for just 0.21 per cent of its GDP.
Part of Britain’s contribution will involve a gift of £110 million to North African countries such as Egypt and Tunisia over the next four years in support of the Arab Spring riots.
Up to £40 million of that will come from the Foreign Office for “political reform”, and £70 million from the Department of International Development to boost the countries’ struggling economies.
When announcing the aid to North Africa, Cameron repeated the same platitudinous excuses that he gave when he handed over £650 million of taxpayers’ money to Pakistan in April.
Then, he said the money to Pakistan would help avoid “the problems of migration [and] of extremism” and that “it’s in our interest that Pakistan succeeds”.
Clearly employing the same speechwriter, Mr Cameron yesterday announced, “If we can secure greater democracy and freedom in countries like Egypt and Tunisia, that is good for us back at home.
“That will mean less extremism, it will mean more peace and prosperity, and it will mean there won’t be the pressures of immigration that we might otherwise face to our own country.”
In 2005, the richest eight nations pledged to hike aid spending to 0.7 per cent of their gross national products by 2013.
Since 2004, Britain has raised spending on overseas aid by a whopping 74 per cent, three times the level of increase in Japan and Italy. Other countries have failed to find £12 billion of the cash they pledged in 2005.
The chief beneficiary of British aid is India, a country that has its own space, nuclear and foreign aid programmes. It gets £295 million a year.
Other top yearly recipients include Ethiopia (£214m and set to rise), Bangladesh (£149m and set to rise), Sudan (£146m), Tanzania (£144m), Afghanistan (£133m), Nigeria (114m and set to rise), the Democratic Republic of Congo (£109m and set to rise), Ghana (£90m) and, of course, Pakistan, which is set to receive a staggering £446 million a year from British taxpayers.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British national Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Monday, 30 May 2011

British National Party Activists Pay Tribute to Blackpools Charlene Downes Despite Police Threats

British National Party Activists Pay Tribute to Charlene Downes Despite Police Threats

British National Party activists paid tribute to missing teenager Charlene Downes in Blackpool today despite strong opposition from police who threatened to arrest party members and throw away the wreath laid for Charlene as “rubbish”.
Activists attempted to lay a wreath and a bunch of flowers in Charlene’s memory outside Mr Beanz, the takeaway shop in Dickson Road where she was believed to have been groomed, murdered and had her body turned into kebabs by the shop’s owners.
The activists, led by National Organiser Adam Walker and Cllr Mike Whitby, were told by police that they were in breach of the Public Order Act for being near the takeaway shop and that they would be arrested if they did not move immediately. The police attempted to issue Mr Walker and the activists with written warnings, but they did not accept them.
When the activists tried to lay the wreath for Charlene outside the shop, police told them that it would be thrown away as it was “rubbish” and would be seen as “incitement”.
Activists said a prayer for Charlene then went to Blackpool town centre and distributed to the public over 2,000 “Our Children Are Not Halal Meat” leaflets, which warn about the Muslim paedophile grooming epidemic in Britain.
Afterwards, activists laid the wreath at Charlene Downes’s memorial bench in Blackpool’s Stanley Park and held a minute’s silence for her.
Mr Walker said he wanted to hold a dignified ceremony to raise awareness about the victims of Muslim paedophile grooming and murder, not just in Blackpool, but all over the country.
He said it was disturbing that there are people holidaying in Blackpool now who are blissfully unaware of the horrors that have taken place there and will continue to take place.
“What we have got here is certain members of our community who are grooming and drugging our children for sex. It’s completely unacceptable, and it makes my blood boil,” Mr Walker told British National Party TV.
“It’s only the British National Party at the moment that has the guts to speak about this sort of thing. We’re here for our people, and we’re fighting back. We’re going to start bullying these bullies.”
Blackpool schoolgirl Charlene Downes disappeared in 2003 aged fourteen.
The owners of what is now Mr Beanz takeaway, Jordinian Iyad Albattikhi and Iranian Mohammed Reveshi, were tried for her murder in 2007 and 2008 but were acquitted after police failings and awarded with nearly half a million pounds in compensation.
The verdict was met with disbelief as police had captured more than 50 tape recordings of the two men in which it was reported that they joked about chopping up Charlene’s body, putting her through a mincing machine “bones and all” and putting her remains into their kebabs.
Mr Beanz has also been linked to teenage Paige Chivers, a fifteen-year-old girl who went missing in 2007.
Charlene’s mother Karen has said that she hopes that there is now enough public pressure for the police to re-open the investigation.
You can see British National Party Television’s video report by clicking the first image below.



Activists outside the Mr Beanz takeaway in Dickson Road

At the Stanley Park memorial bench

Mike Whitby with the memorial wreath
Also video of Police threats to Activists
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4
581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Saturday, 28 May 2011

Why is intelligence frowned upon?’ – Great Article on the Dumbing Down of Children


‘Why is cleverness frowned upon?’ – Great Article on the Dumbing Down of Children and the Education System



I’ve came across this article from The Independent describing the “non-learning”
happening in UK schools. Funny,
Why is cleverness frowned upon?
Tom Hodgkinson
Having three children in the state primary system, I’ve seen the results of New Labour’s Brave New World anti-intellectualism up close. Academic work has been largely dropped. Times tables, spelling, grammar and good handwriting are not taught. One teacher told us that correcting spelling might interrupt “the creative flow”. In the playground, age-old games such as conkers and It are banned, as they might upset someone. The local authority, we are told, has also banned the ancient game of football, because it encourages competitive behaviour. Instead, pupils are treated to lavish praise, sex education and colouring in, plus a big dose of television via the whiteboards. The place is awash with laptops. There is a therapeutic ethos, and in “circle time”, pupils are encouraged to talk about their problems at home. Cleverness is frowned upon: yesterday my daughter said she didn’t like being clever and was considering doing bad work so she would be moved down a set.
As it gradually dawned on my wife and me that there was very little of what we would call teaching going on, we decided to step in and fill the gaps ourselves. (Mr Gove has promised a return to a more traditional agenda, but how long will it take?) So now at home we drill the children in times tables, teach them the rudiments of grammar, and we all learn Latin together with a tutor via Skype. We play competitive games and do wrestling. We tell them off. We praise them for good work, but tick them off for bad work. And in a sense this is all the wrong way round: schools are doing the parenting and the parents are doing the schooling.
The upside, it’s true, is that children enjoy school. Our kids react with horror when we threaten them with home education. The downside is that parents are forced to take on the burden of educating their children properly, as the state has shrugged it off.
I hear similar anecdotes about the secondary system: one English teacher told a parent we know that they didn’t teach spelling because pupils could use the spellcheck on their computers. Instead of books, “texts” are taught. A dumbed-down relativism has led to the idea that a web page or an advertisement is as worthy of study as William Blake. I blame Roland Barthes: I myself was briefly infatuated by the French post-structuralist writer, whose book Mythologies was a big hit with trendy undergraduates. We liked the way he used his considerable intellect to write about the Citro√ę* DS. But really Mythologies was just a cerebral game, and shouldn’t have been taken as the basis for a whole education system.
Another culprit would be the journalist Toby Young. His magazine Modern Review, which flourished briefly in the early 1990s, celebrated the idea that you could write about Terminator 2 as if it was high art. All things were equal. There was nothing better or worse, and beauty was in the eye of the beholder. Mr Young has thankfully rejected this creed and is now attempting to set up a school which will concentrate on Latin and grammar rather than empathy and self-esteem.
Oh yes, self-esteem. If everyone has lots of self-esteem, the theory goes, no one will commit crime and everybody will be nice to each other. But the theory is clearly nonsense. When combined with an anti-academic education system, the result is children who are stupid, but who have a lot of self-esteem. And that is a worrying combination. My local landlord tells me that the graduates from the local comp who he employs in the pub not only cannot spell “gravy”, but get upset when you point this out. We should remember that self-esteem under its old name, pride, was considered sinful.
The combination of stupidity and self-esteem, though, makes for very good consumers. Every child is taught shopping and spending skills to a high level. It is all summed up in advertising slogans such as “Because you’re worth it”. The commercial world continues to promote the self-bigging-up agenda through products. If you’re feeling down, you go shopping, and because you have not been taught how to think, you don’t realise that you are being conned.
I would dearly love to start an anti-materialist advertising campaign that featured a monk with his head bowed and the slogan, “Because I’m not worth it.”
Self-esteem, or self-confidence, in any case, comes not from self-esteem classes, but from ability. “Competence is the foundation of happiness,” wrote William Cobbett. Teachers, simply, should teach knowledge, or scientia, and skills, or arti. That sort of teaching, and not happiness lessons, will lead to a fulfilled life.
You might also like:from http://vigilantcitizen.com/
 

 
Dumbing Down Society Part I: Foods, Beverages and Meds
Dumbing Down Society Pt 2: Mercury in Foods and Vaccines
Transhumanism, Psychological Warfare an

Thursday, 26 May 2011

Asylum Seeker Costs Soar at Home and Abroad

British taxpayers have had to pay out £1.2 billion in the last three years to house and support “asylum seekers”, a figure that accounts for just part of the yearly asylum swindle.
The released figures show that, in the past three years, the UK Border Agency has wasted nearly £400 million of taxpayers’ money on housing for those claiming asylum.
The Agency also provided a further £192 million in cash support for asylum seekers in that time period. Another £407 million was spent providing care for unaccompanied refugee children.
The figures do not include the cost of how much is spent on deporting – or failing to deport – those judged to be bogus asylum seekers.
The total cost of the asylum system has been calculated by Migration Watch at £2 billion a year.
The spending was criticized by the TaxPayers’ Alliance. A spokesman said: “It’s staggering that over a few years there’s a billion pound price tag for housing and supporting asylum seekers. There will be costs but this is a very big bill for taxpayers.”
The bulk of the money is spent on building council and social housing for so-called asylum seekers, most of whom have crossed several internationally recognized safe countries to reach the benefits paradise of Britain.
The soaring cost of asylum is not just restricted to Britain, of course, but is mirrored across the Western world.
It was announced earlier in May that Australia’s predicted asylum bill for illegal immigrants arriving by boats has quadrupled this year to over one billion Australian dollars (£691 million). The biggest expense for the country this coming year will be an estimated £462 million on detention and related costs.
Incredibly, part of the Australian government’s “solution” to its worsening immigration problem is to pay £191 million to import yet more refugees.
The so-called Malaysia Solution, championed by prime minister and Labor Party leader Julia Gillard, will see Australia send “up to” 800 asylum seekers to Malaysia in return for receiving a further 4,000 people judged to be “genuine refugees”.
Australia has gullibly gifted Malaysia with £50 million over the next four years to accept the handful of immigrants, which will run Australian taxpayers £62,000 per deportee if all 800 are sent, which is believed to be extremely unlikely.
Only the British National Party will bring an end to the invasion of our country. The British National Party argues that asylum seekers have the right of refuge in the first safe country bordering the one they flee, and do not have the right to cross any safe countries to reach Britain.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Wednesday, 25 May 2011

Britain The Benefits Riviera of the World

The Benefits Riviera of the World


By John Salvage –
 

Credit Crunch... what Credit Crunch? The world's top spot for the good life, where homes, and everything in them, including ash trays, as highlighted by the British National Party almost a decade ago, is getting even more comfortable. It sounds like a great place to visit, and millions have decided to stay. So where is it? Here, of course.
Many of these visitors cannot speak the native language, one of over fifty spoken here, thus the ever-so-kind taxpayers have decided, at least by their voting patterns, to pay for them to have their wishes translated into English. The cost? Nothing really, well, not to them anyway. The taxpayers, easily herded into ‘political gas chambers with broken promises and wild ideas of equality, pay around £116,000 per week collectively for this 'service.'
Happy to vote for illegal and horrific wars, the people living in The Benefits Riviera of the world, formerly known as Great Britain, also enjoy helping in excess of 180,000 immigrants, sorry, visitors, some of them 'health tourists,' to the tune of £78,000,000 per year. Money going to support visitors' children still in their homeland, while one or both parents are enjoying life here, is estimated to cost more than £20,000,000. every year.
The number of these types of claims has risen by 20 per cent in the past year alone, and is in reference to Eastern Europe only. Of course, this does not even include visitors from Africa, Asia, the Far East, South America, China, or the West Indies.
Our system is rigged to promote 'equality,' and that now includes literally anyone with enough Chutzpah to 'enjoy our hospitality' from anywhere in the world. Why wouldn't anyone take this opportunity? Many people have been driven from here, and other Western countries for decades, with dreams of making a better life. Some, of course, have returned. They do not want to admit that the grass is not greener on the other side. Having said that, people taking their families to shores of gold, and seas of fun and prosperity, means that something is wrong here, or from whence they came. Except for those not of indigenous European descent, there are not that many options left open to them, and this also goes for those who made Africa a civilised, crime-free and prosperous continent in the last century and before that.
And now, the Benefits Riviera of planet earth, so loved and hated in equal terms by millions, has a gaping hole in its institutions. That hole, which includes what was once a world-renowned health service, armed forces, and police force, sits alone, begging for help from someone, somewhere. It sits alone, in the northern part of Europe, broken, crime ridden, and helpless.
Still, we have some heart-warming things to fill our evenings with, as millions starve, freeze to death, and find nothing relevant in terms of jobs or careers, self-employment and future prospects. Yes, we have a coalition government, made up of 'opposing ideologies.' They are different; some call themselves Liberals, others Socialist, and some Conservative, with the odd few apparently very worried about being integrated into the EU.
Yes, they are different, they are different to us, their lives are 'gold plated' against poverty. They are also different in many other things also. They differ from the millions who come here looking for a better life, but want so much to bring equality and fairness in society to them. After all, it won't be long before an immigrant, or one from immigrant ancestry, takes the 'top job' and becomes Prime Minister, just like America.
Not of Britain, of course, but of England. Scotland and Wales will, of course, be able to enjoy this idea, as they are now preparing to depart from the ancient Britanicus that at one time was one single entity. Soon, we will have our very own Barack Obama. Equality would then be total. The Marxists, so wonderfully financed by the foreign bankers of old, would then be a happy bunch.
Marxism is, of course, along with its later creation, the 'Frankfurt School,' the bedrock of the whole sham now playing at a city, town or village near you. This bedrock was not particularly stable, though, as the whole house of cards was financed by those who will soon show how ruthless they are. How so? It's like this: Super capitalists, mainly immigrants themselves, embedded in Europe and New York, desperately needed a vehicle to drive their plan of world fiscal and resource domination into being. Once this was achieved, so-called Socialist revolutions could then explode all over the world. Now they have completed this, many who voted Labour, joined unions, and basically threw the baby out with the bath water by despising their traditions and culture, will suffer severely. Nothing is safe, and no amount of students demonstrating, or people moaning in the decreasing number of pubs etc., will stop what is coming if solid action is not forthcoming. Our little island may be the benefits Riviera of the world, but it is simply unsustainable.
With so-called 'main-stream' ideology comes propaganda, and now it is all coming home to roost. Marxism and basic Social and Capital dogma has been proven to be one and the same. It's all now becoming clearer, and our little nation, once the breadbasket of the world in sheer engineering and export terms, is being broken, smashed into pieces, and everyone will become a victim.
Now we have only one choice, and that is to take a lead from all the opposing groups, and polarise our efforts no matter what. Somehow, and somewhere and sometime soon, very soon, there will have to be a single entity on the worldwide stage, one that will reach every individual, group, and political party wherever they are on earth of Anglo-Celtic origin. We have little time, so watch this space, as it is becoming apparent that a legal representative with a recognised diplomatic status, to push for the rights and renaissance of our kind, will become a reality.
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

Tuesday, 24 May 2011

Arrested and Tortured by Police for Telling the Truth About Labour Party Perverts

Arrested for Telling the Truth
News Team

Two British National Party activists were arrested in Liverpool last month for distributing leaflets that disclose information of 25 Labour party paedophiles. The treatment of the activists by police while in custody is now subject to an investigation.

Peter Tierney and Andrew Tierney were arrested on 30 April for distributing Labour 25 leaflets, which detail the names of 25 convicted councillors, activists and mayors of the Labour party for paedophilic offences such as child rape.

While in custody, Peter Tierney said that he was subjected to violent abuse by police officers, who bruised his ribs and stamped on his jaw after he refused to have his fingerprints taken.

Speaking about the contents of the leaflet, Mr Tierney said: “This is all fact. When we were taken into the police station, we actually begged them to get us into court so we could bring all this evidence to court.”

Nick Griffin, who met with Mr Tierney regarding the incident before the North-West Way Forward meeting on Thursday, said of details on the Labour 25 leaflet:

“They’re all genuine. They’re all proven. They’re all convicted. There’s a serious degree of sympathy for paedophilia within not just the Labour party but within the entire political establishment, hence, for instance, in which they lowered the age of consent to sixteen. One day it’s paedophilia – they change the law – it’s no longer paedophilia.”

When asked about Mr Tierney’s treatment by police, Mr Griffin commented: “It’s a symptom of how out of control the police force and judiciary is. The police are making it up as they go along, and this is something that has to be opposed and exposed.”

The below videos feature the interview with Mr Tierney and the activism on 30 April for which he and his brother were arrested.

More information about the Labour 25 campaign can be found on its blog, www.labour25.wordpress.com

f you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

When Do You Want the British National Party Truth Truck in Your Town?

When Do You Want the Truth Truck in Your Town?

Despite the best efforts of the police, the left-wing media and vile internet gossipmongers, the British National Party’s famous and much-loved Truth Truck made a huge impact in the recent round of elections.
This beacon of hope was seen and heard spreading our message in England, Scotland and Wales by hundreds of thousands of people on the non-stop election tour of the Home Nations.
Newly painted, refurbished, taxed and insured and now displaying our beautiful new logo, the impact of this vital weapon in our armoury must literally be seen to be believed. Therefore, we are now taking bookings and drawing up a schedule for the Truth Truck to tour the length and breadth of Britain, starting in June.
All members, organisers, candidates and supporters are asked to contact their Regional Organiser or local officials and request the Truth Truck to come to their area, and we will make it happen.
Of course, our lovely warrior of the road has just returned from a non-stop marathon of over 4,000 miles. She drank just under £2,000 of diesel and got a few knocks here and there. She was pelted with bricks in “the wrong part” of Swansea and came under fire again when a left-wing lout in Cardiff threw a bottle and cracked the windscreen.
Our once great police force looked on without taking action, but the Truth Truck and the volunteer drivers finished their full tour of duty regardless – we will never be stopped.
http://communications.bnp.org.uk/donatenow_button.jpg
So now our warrior of the road needs a full service, which is overdue, and a new windscreen, before she sets off on her next National Tour. But of course this will not all come for free. Although all labour has been freely promised by British National Party members and supporters, the following costs will need to be met:

COST:
Windscreen = £400
Oil change, 35 litres = £150
Oil filter = £45
Air filter = £110
Brakes relining = £320
Handbrake reconditioning = £285

Approx costs to be met = £1,500

Our lady of the road always starts, always tells the truth and never moans at the long hours she works for the cause! She keeps on trucking, day after day, even with her aches and pains. She is a powerful weapon in our political war, and she carries her scars with pride. We need to refresh the vital parts of our lovely lady and send her out again shouting, “Here is hope, here is truth, here is the British National Party. BRITAIN WILL BE SAVED.” 
Please donate to this appeal to keep the Truth Truck on the road and coming to a town near you SOON.
When you donate to this Truth Truck Servicing Appeal, it will be like you are sitting in the cab with our drivers and me as we take this beacon of truth and beauty on our new National Tour. You will be standing shoulder to shoulder with me as we take our message of hope to millions with our very own Truth Truck.

Please accept my sincere thanks,
Nick Griffin
Member of the European Parliament

P.S.  You may not know the names of the people who will be given hope by your donation today, but they will carry hope in their hearts that we are here, standing up for their interests when all others have failed them, when they see our Truth Truck.
http://communications.bnp.org.uk/donatenow_button.jpg
If you liked this news article, please donate to help with running costs and improvements of the British National Party website.
Alternatively ring our donations hotline on 0844 809 4581. If operators are busy, please try again.

When they Wake Up : About Labour and their Treason

When they Wake Up PDF Print E-mail
Written by Jack Black   first published at http://thebritishresistance.co.uk/
britishlion_120_x_91On 9 March 2009, Sir Andrew Green, the Chairman of MigrationWatch, was quoted thus by The Daily Star:
"THE GOVERNMENT HAS HELD PUBLIC OPINION IN CONTEMPT FOR YEARS. DESPITE HAVING DISMANTLED BORDER CONTROLS, THEY DELIBERATELY ENCOURAGED IMMIGRATION... THE CONSERVATIVES HANDED OVER BORDER CONTROLS TO THE EU BUT ALL THE OTHER FACTORS ARE DOWN TO NEW LABOUR…
The Government seems to make a habit of blaming ‘global forces’ but OUR ANALYSIS SHOWS THIS PROBLEM IS ALMOST ENTIRELY HOME GROWN’."
The Star added:
"BRITAIN’S IMMIGRATION CHAOS IS DOWN TO DISASTROUS LABOUR POLICIES AND NOT GLOBAL POPULATION MOVEMENT. A DAMNING NEW REPORT ACCUSES THE GOVERNMENT OF A ‘SMOKESCREEN’ TO COVER UP ITS OWN FAILURES. LABOUR’S DISMANTLING OF BORDER CONTROLS AND ENCOURAGING FOREIGNERS TO ARRIVE EN MASSE HAS SEEN IMMIGRATION TREBLE...
UP TO 947,000 ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS COULD BE IN THE UK – TWO-THIRDS MORE THAN A HOME OFFICE ESTIMATE IN 2001…
EMBARKATION CONTROLS WERE SCRAPPED IN 1998, SO FOREIGNERS ON TIME-LIMITED VISAS REALISED THAT THERE WERE NO CHECKS TO SEE THAT THEY EVER LEFT. IN 1997 THE PRIMARY PURPOSE RULE – WHERE APPLICANTS HAD TO SHOW THEIR MARRIAGE WAS NOT ‘PRIMARILY TO OBTAIN ADMISSION TO THE UK’ – WAS SCRAPPED, LEADING TO A 50% INCREASE IN SPOUSES ARRIVING.
The report says that since about 2000 THE GOVERNMENT HAS SPECIFICALLY ENCOURAGED THE ARRIVAL OF ECONOMIC MIGRANTS. And unlike most EU partners, LABOUR FAILED TO IMPOSE CONTROLS OVER NUMBERS."
New Labour was doing much more than "encourage the arrival of economic migrants".
Its failure "to impose a control over numbers" was a DELIBERATE attempt to multiculturalise our world against the wishes of the vast majority of the British people.
On 23 October 2009, Andrew Neather, a former government advisor to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett amongst others, dropped this revelatory bombshell in The Evening Standard:
THE DELIBERATE POLICY OF MINISTERS FROM LATE 2000 UNTIL AT LEAST FEBRUARY LAST YEAR… WAS TO OPEN UP THE UK TO MASS MIGRATION
The PIU's reports were legendarily tedious within Whitehall BUT THEIR BIG IMMIGRATION REPORT WAS SURROUNDED BY AN UNUSUAL AIR OF BOTH ANTICIPATION AND SECRECY. DRAFTS WERE HANDED OUT IN SUMMER 2000 ONLY WITH EXTREME RELUCTANCE: THERE WAS A PARANOIA ABOUT IT REACHING THE MEDIA...
EARLIER DRAFTS I SAW ALSO INCLUDED A DRIVING POLITICAL PURPOSE: THAT MASS IMMIGRATION WAS THE WAY THAT THE GOVERNMENT WAS GOING TO MAKE THE UK TRULY MULTICULTURAL. I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that THE POLICY WAS INTENDED… TO RUB THE RIGHT'S NOSE IN DIVERSITY and render their arguments out of date…
THERE WAS A RELUCTANCE... IN GOVERNMENT TO DISCUSS WHAT INCREASED IMMIGRATION WOULD MEAN, ABOVE ALL FOR LABOUR'S CORE WHITE WORKING-CLASS VOTE. This shone through even in the published report: THE ‘SOCIAL OUTCOMES’ IT TALKS ABOUT ARE SOLELY THOSE FOR IMMIGRANTS…
The results were dramatic. In 1995, 55,000 FOREIGNERS WERE GRANTED THE RIGHT TO SETTLE IN THE UK. BY 2005 THAT HAD RISEN TO 179,000... In addition, HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF MIGRANTS HAVE COME FROM THE NEW EU MEMBER STATES SINCE 2004, MOST REQUIRING NEITHER VISAS NOR PERMISSION TO WORK OR SETTLE… THE GOVERNMENT HAD CREATED ITS LONGED-FOR IMMIGRATION BOOM”.
You might think, from the astounding revelations cited above that Andrew Neather is a whistleblower.
Far from it, as the title of his essay, Don't listen to the whingers, London needs immigrants suggests, he is still four square behind New Labour's imposition of the Multicult upon a bewildered and disenfranchised majority.
Those we vote for are at war with the British people. They have DELIBERATELY destroyed our world. Does anyone who read the articles cited above truly believe that the Labour Party, an organisation created to support and encourage the working man, has put the British worker first in this country over the last twelve years? Don’t you think that New Labour has put the rights and wants of the foreigner a thousand light years in front of ours? Don’t you think that they have spent a lot more time cuddling up to the fattest of the fat cat businessmen and the greediest of the greedy bankers than ever they have to the British people as a whole?
And how about Gulf War II? How has an illegitimate war conceived by American, Israeli and British warmongers benefited us? And the obscenity that is Afghanistan? How was this unwinnable war ever going to make our lives any safer or better?
These wars have ushered hundreds of our finest young men and women into an early grave and severely injured thousands more. They have also caused the Muslim world to hate us and seek to kill us in our turn, as they did successfully on 7/7/2005. They have also cost us all many billions of pounds which, I think you’ll agree, we could all do with right now.
We have been betrayed, ladies and gentlemen. Those we elected to serve us have instead served themselves and the dark powers who, behind the scenes, have been pulling their strings and paying their real wages all along.
Tony Blair's favourite New World Order buzz-word when he ruled over us was "interdependency". He spent the whole of his time in office making our country as dependent as he could upon others. If you are dependent upon others for food, heat, medicine and medical and technical expertise, you can never rebel. You can never thwart the will of Big Brother. It’s as simple as that.
Consider the following statistics:
In 1995 there were 35,000 dairy farmers in the UK. By 2006, Tony Blair's love of big business had seen this figure drop to 21,000. The supermarkets are forcing three British dairy farmers out of business every day. (New Labour's principal monetary sponsor, Lord Sainsbury, owns the Sainsbury supermarket chain and Margaret Thatcher's Westminster Council pin-up girl, Dame Shirley Porter, owns Tesco)
Between 1997 and 2002, the number of UK farm workers fell by 100,000. Between 1997 and 2002, butchers, bakers, newsagents, fishmongers and the like were closing at the rate of fifty a week in Tony Blair's Cool Brittania.
In 1995, the UK fishing industry comprised 9,750 vessels. In 2005 there were just 6,722 of these left with a good few of these owned and crewed by non-indigenous fishermen.
Here's a little EU insanity:
In 2004, the UK exported 1,500 tonnes of potatoes to Germany and imported 1,500 tonnes from Germany. We also exported 10,200 tonnes of milk and cream to France and imported 9,900 tonnes from that country.
Since Margaret Thatcher came to power in 1979, hundreds of British pits have been closed and there are now just seven left. Of this national disaster, Alan Johnson, Secretary of State for Trade and Industry at the time, (he would later be promoted to Home Secretary) commented insensitively thus:
"The pace of GLOBALISATION is increasing… Britain is one of the most open, trading nations in the world… we are stronger and richer as a result and have ABSOLUTELY NO INTENTION OF REVERSING THE PROCESS. Whatever the difficulties and challenges of GLOBALISATION the answers will not be found in the stagnant waters of protectionism…
In the UK, we welcome companies who… want to operate in our competitive liberalised market… WE BELIEVE IN GLOBAL CONSUMER CHAMPIONS, NOT NATIONAL CHAMPIONS... Already, BRITAIN IMPORTS 10 MILLION TONNES OF RUSSIAN COAL EVERY YEAR, whilst the EU as a whole imports 40 million tonnes… More than a fifth of Europe’s gas comes from Russia.
SHELL, BP, and smaller companies like Victoria Oil and Gas INVEST OVER $16 BILLION IN THE RUSSIAN OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY BETWEEN THEM. And a Russian company recently announced investment to resurrect the Hatfield colliery here in the UK."
In January 2009, the French power company, EDF, bought British Energy, the largest electricity generator and nuclear operator in Britain.
Now tell me, ladies and gentlemen, is there really anyone out there who is happy to rely on Russia and France for all their energy needs? Can any of you possibly be comfortable with the fact that we are now so dependent upon those who were our sworn enemies not so long ago?
If "interdependency" was Tony B Liar's favourite New World Order buzz-word, Gordon Brown’s was "globalisation".
On 26 January 2009, Brown said this to the Foreign Press Association in London:
"We could allow this crisis to start a retreat from globalisation… We could close our markets – for capital, financial services, trade and FOR LABOUR – and therefore REDUCE THE RISKS OF GLOBALISATION… Or we could view the threats and challenges we face today as THE DIFFICULT BIRTH-PANGS OF A NEW GLOBAL ORDER - and our task now as nothing less than making the transition through A NEW INTERNATIONALISM to the benefits of an expanding GLOBAL SOCIETY… SETTING THE NEW RULES FOR THIS NEW GLOBAL ORDER."
On 18 April 2008, Brown gave a speech at the John F Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum in Boston, during which he used the word "global" and its derivatives 79 TIMES!
The Browns and those who own them view the world as a global village. They believe that it is their absolute right to rule over this village forever. Iraqs, Afghanistans and world-wide recessions are constructed and foist upon the decent many in order that the rule of the indecent few be cemented into place. The nation state, the only obstacle in the way of this "elite" conspiracy, must be rendered obsolete for total control to be realised.
Nationalism is the direct opposite of Globalism. Nationalism, the love of one’s own land, culture and kin by a nation’s people, is the one thing the Blairs, Browns and Big Brothers are afraid of. The Nationalist does not wish to rule the world, he wants only to hold sway in the land that he and his ancestors made.
On 9 March 2009, Lord Peter Mandelson, the architect of New Labour, said this in the House of Commons:
"The nationals coming here from the original eight new accession countries are helping to fill gaps in our labour market our British Nationals are either not available to fill OR ARE UNWILLING TO FILL."
And yet, on 10 March 2009, The Daily Express was telling us this:
"Earlier this month, 3,000 job-seekers arrived at a zoo in Warwickshire chasing 150 vacancies for zoo rangers, kitchen staff and cleaners. And 600 people applied for a single post as a £22,762-a-year emergency call operator in the West Midlands... At a time of high and rising unemployment, it is incredibly arrogant of Lord Mandelson to assume that British workers are not willing to do these jobs. Most of the unemployed are desperate to get back to work…
The official UK unemployment rate is close to two million and is forecast to exceed three million by next year. Yet figures show 3.8 MILLION PEOPLE BORN OVERSEAS ARE NOW WORKING IN BRITAIN, more than double that of 10 years ago. And a recent study by think-tank Migrationwatch found that 1.08 million out of the 1.34 million new jobs created since 2001 have gone to non-UK citizens."
On 9 March 2009, Leo McKinstry said this in The Daily Express:
"Prime Minister Brown always tries to pin all the blame on global problems or sub-prime lending in America. But the fact is that HE IS DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CURRENT MESS. IT WAS HE WHO PUSHED FOR THE DISASTROUS SHOTGUN MARRIAGE BETWEEN LLOYDS TSB AND HBOS, PROMISING LLOYDS BOSS SIR VICTOR BLANK THAT HE WOULD WAIVE THE RULES ABOUT COMPETITION TO SMOOTH THE MERGER.
IT WAS BROWN WHO RUINED THE PUBLIC FINANCES, PUSHED FOR MORE GLOBALISATION, PROMOTED THE CREDIT BUBBLE, WRECKED THE PRIVATE PENSIONS SYSTEM AND SOLD OFF OUR GOLD RESERVES."
In a previous issue of The Express, McKinstry summed it up intelligently when he said:
"IT IS NOW CLEAR THE ECONOMIC CATASTROPHE HAS BEEN BROUGHT ABOUT BY THE TWIN FORCES OF EXCESSIVE BORROWING AND UNFETTERED GLOBALISATION. THE WILFUL DISREGARD FOR EITHER FINANCIAL RESTRAINT OR THE BRITISH NATIONAL INTEREST HAS BEEN A DISASTER FOR OUR COUNTRY, DESTROYING JOBS AND STORING UP DEBTS THAT WILL BE A BURDEN FOR GENERATIONS.
So what is the Government’s solution?
More borrowing and MORE GLOBALISATION, of course… IN FASHIONABLE POLITICAL CIRCLES IT IS REGARDED AS OUTRAGEOUS TO ADVOCATE THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD PUT THE INTERESTS OF THE BRITISH PUBLIC FIRST by limiting the movement of labour, tightening borders, supporting domestic industries or restricting imports...
THE VERY CONCEPT OF A NATIONAL INTEREST IS TREATED AS BACKWARD. THE NATURAL IMPULSE TO LOOK AFTER ONE’S OWN, WHAT USED TO BE SEEN AS NOBLE PATRIOTISM, IS NOW REGARDED AS DANGEROUSLY REACTIONARY. So we end up with the alternative created by the globalisation freaks where BRITISH WORKERS ARE DENIED THE RIGHT TO APPLY FOR JOBS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY, where the welfare state pays an Afghan single mother £170,000 a year in housing benefit to live in a large villa in west London, WHERE DOLE QUEUES LENGTHEN WHILE CALL-CENTRES ARE RELOCATED TO INDIA and where desperate migrants flood into the country to be exploited by employers paying £1 an hour…
THE CREED OF GLOBALISATION HAS BROUGHT NOTHING BUT MISERY. IF WE’D HAD A BANKING SYSTEM THAT PUT THE INTERESTS OF OUR COUNTRY FIRST WE WOULD NOT BE IN THE PRESENT CHAOS, SINCE OUR BANKS WOULD NOT HAVE INDULGED IN RECKLESS LENDING TO SUB-PRIME AMERICAN HOMEBUYERS, RUSSIAN OLIGARCHS OR SPANISH PROPERTY INVESTORS...
A SENSE OF NATIONAL PRIDE, THE INSTINCT THAT LIES BEHIND PROTECTIONISM, WOULD HAVE PREVENTED BRITAIN FROM ENDURING THE LUNACIES OF MULTI-CULTURALISM. WITHOUT GLOBALISATION WE WOULD STILL BE AN INDEPENDENT COUNTRY RATHER THAN MERELY A REGION OF THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE, AN ENTITY FOR WHICH WE NEVER VOTED. WE WOULD NOT HAVE TO HAND OVER £12BILLION A YEAR TO BRUSSELS FOR THE PRIVILEGE OF BEING GOVERNED BY EUROCRATS.
In a protectionist Britain that looked after its own people we would not be squandering £8billion a year on overseas aid, most of it going to Africa where it is used to prop up tyrannical, kleptocratic regimes. It is the height of absurdity that we are forking out £40million a year in subsidies to Mugabe’s Zimbabwe."
Leo McKinstry was moved to say these things, ladies and gentlemen, despite the fact that he was once a Labour Councillor and a parliamentary aide to Harriet Harman, the Deputy Leader of the New Labour Party!
In 1998, the Home Secretary, Jack Straw, oversaw the imposition of a new set of Race Laws.
These laws gave the government the power to imprison us for seven long years if we committed the crime of "incitement to racial hatred". (A crime that didn't exist prior to 1965) Such law was not designed to rein in the immigrant, ladies and gentlemen. It was created to shackle us as the globalist went to war with the nation state. Our race laws were constructed to encourage and promote the outsider at the expense of the native Briton. And they have, haven't they?
Have our politicians flooded our country with unwanted foreigners against our will over the last few decades? Have they spent the last 40-odd years giving our council housing stock to the same foreigners? Are they giving our jobs to them as we speak? Are our formerly nationalised industries, which once belonged to all the British people, now owned, not just by foreign countries like France, but by a few mega-rich "new global order" aliens as well?
Are you not aware that our politicians have, wherever they could, covered up non-native criminality and trumpeted the reverse? Did it never occur to you, ladies and gentlemen, that the "New Global Order" would be that much easier to achieve if THEY could convince the most gullible and trusting Britons (the young) to believe that the immigrant hordes were, somehow, better than us?
Ever since the first race law was introduced in 1965 by the Labour Home Secretary of the time, Frank Soskice, (himself a Russian immigrant) our own politicians have put the foreigner first in our country.
The same politicians put the British working-classes, who had worked so hard, sacrificed so much and died the deaths in all their wars, a very long way last.
According to information supplied by the 5 April 2011 edition of The Daily Mail, in just 19 of the UK's 52 police districts, 91,234 foreigners were arrested in 2010!
If we extrapolate the 91,234 figure across the whole of the UK, we arrive at a grand total of 249,593 immigrants arrested in the UK last year!
Which is so “enriching”, don’t you think? So liable to make us wish to “cohere” with Johnny Foreigner. So wonderfully “diverse” and “multicultural”! At least, that’s what it is if you’re an active member of the Labour Party, the Lib Dems or the Greens. Or you are happy to belong to the hug-a-hoodie wing of the David Cameron’s lot. Or you are a PC activist, a bought and paid for government jobsworth or an immigrant yourself.
If you dare to speak out about the damage the 249,593 are doing, all of the above will label you a "racist", a "Fascist", a "bigot", a "Nazi", a "dinosaur" and/or a "little Englander". And if you dare to speak out about the hidden statistics, those that include the second and third-generation immigrant criminals, you are an even bigger "racist", "Fascist", "bigot", "Nazi", "dinosaur", "little Englander". Speak out anyway and hit back with the word "traitor". Your one insult will be a thousand light years more truthful than any number of theirs.
In a 1944 essay titled 'The English People', George Orwell wrote with affection of the ‘gentle-mannered, undemonstrative, law-abiding English’. He said that foreigners were amazed by our ‘gentleness… by the orderly behaviour of English crowds, the lack of pushing and quarrelling’. He also said that there was ‘very little crime or violence.’ Despite the war, that’s how our world was in 1944.
In 1955, the anthropologist, Geoffrey Gorer, was moved to say this:
The English are certainly among the most peaceful, gentle, courteous and orderly populations that the civilised world has ever seen.”
That’s how our world was in 1955. That, ladies and gentlemen, is what we had before the social engineers, those who know so much better and see so much further than the rest of us, decided to change it all. By 2009, one uniquely honest Labour politician was admitting to this:
In my constituency… there are now more violent crimes against the person than there were in the whole country 50 years ago.” And now we have the figures. In just one year, around 250,000 foreigners were arrested in this country.
You know, they could put me in jail for seven years for telling the unfashionable truths that I tell. And yet, unlike the politicians who created the Brit-bashing seven-year law, I don’t spin, I don’t lie, I don’t exaggerate and I don’t cover up. I just dare to say the things that the richest and most powerful of the globalist gangsters do not want you to know.
I dared to say some of these things in the 2010 General Election where I stood as an Independent candidiate. I leafleted extensively and was able to put my views pretty candidly in the local newspapers. As a result, a huge number of people were able to access a deal of damning information that they would otherwise not have come across. Nevertheless, their verdict was categoric. I polled just over 400 votes, 0.8% of the total. Despite the observably terrible behaviours of those who had brought about a state affairs where, in just one British constituency, "there are now more violent crimes against the person than there were in the whole country 50 years ago", the British people were not prepared to contemplate voting those who had created such a dreadful statistic out of office.
At the 2010 General Election, yet again, the British people chose not to heed the warnings.
I hope I’m still here when they wake up to what the politcians have done. I hope I'm still here when political correctness is made a capital crime. I hope I'm still here when the “social engineers" are charged with treason, found guilty and strung up. I hope the good guys who do the stringing let the rest of us watch. I'd pay good money for a front row seat. Any seat at all in fact.
If you are intested in viewing the information contained in the leaflets I delivered in May 2010, these may accessed here

Monday, 23 May 2011

Labour Mass Immigration Policy Why Is This Not Treason ?

Gates of Vienna: Why Is This Not Treason?: "English correspondent Paul Weston returns with a spirited broadside against the treacherous Why Is This Not Treason?
by Paul Weston


A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague. — Cicero



On the 3rd of January 1946, William Joyce, better known as Lord Haw-Haw, was the last man in Britain to be hanged for the ancient crime of treason. Unless a future government changes the law it is unlikely that traitors will ever dangle again, after Tony Blair rather conveniently repealed the death penalty for such a crime in 1998.

That is not to say treason no longer exists. Now the full extent of Labour’s thirteen-year rule has become apparent, an increasing number of Britons are volubly accusing the Labour Party of wilfully and cold-bloodedly betraying Britain and deliberately jeopardising our children’s future.

Lord Haw-Haw of course sided with the Nazis during the hot war of 1939-1945. The recent Labour government might not have been operating in a hot-war theatre, but they certainly carried out a warm-war against the British (principally the English) via mass immigration from one of the most hostile and anti-Western countries in the world, Pakistan.

Consider some of the following statistics:

  • Only nineteen percent of Pakistanis have a negative view of Al Qaeda and by default the Taliban, whilst seventy-five percent wish to see Sharia law implemented. British-born Muslims make an estimated four hundred thousand trips a year to Pakistan, where as many as thirty threats against Britain are being monitored at any given time.
  • Thirty-three percent of Muslim students in Britain think killing in the name of Islam is permissible. Only thirty-seven percent oppose the introduction of Sharia law and only twenty-five percent oppose the creation of a worldwide Muslim caliphate.
  • MI5 believe there are up to four thousand potential terrorists and thirteen thousand Al Qaeda sympathisers living in Britain. The CIA devotes an astonishing forty percent of their anti-terrorist homeland security operations against suspects not in Afghanistan or Waziristan, but in Britain itself — a country described by one CIA operative as “a swamp of Jihadis.”
  • Barack Obama’s counter-terrorist advisor Bruce Riedel recently stated: “The British Pakistani community is recognised as probably Al Qaeda’s best mechanism for launching an attack against North America.”

All in all then, it would seem less than prudent to allow any more bearded ideologues into Britain, yet the Labour government — and this must sound quite insane to most people — actually went to the extraordinary lengths of advertising for foreign colonisers from the very same country the Home Office was paying Danegeld to in a typically limp-wristed appeal to stop it from blowing us up.

The British Embassy in Pakistan distributed glossy pamphlets entitled “Multicultural Britain — a Land of Immigrants” which gave a raft of arguments as to the benefits of living in Britain such as well paid jobs, plain old welfare, and the prospect of inviting over the entire extended family (sans goat) once a British passport had been acquired.

And of course there was the rather unpleasant — nay, treacherous — implication that there was no such thing as a homogenous Britain, no such place as an English homeland, just an indeterminate area of land settled by a vague mongrel collection of disparate peoples including any number of rag-tag colonial racists awaiting divine racial redemption from those they once oppressed.

So desperate were the Labour traitors to destroy Britain that, having secured power, they immediately carried out two political acts which could only place our peaceful future in doubt. The Human Rights Convention was immediately incorporated into British law and immigration rules were relaxed to allow an open-door policy of mass Muslim immigration.

A few thousand people who could gently assimilate were of little use to the Labour government. To ensure the success of their revolutionary plan, they urgently needed inassimilable millions and were quite prepared to deceive the British public about the real number of Muslim immigrants — and the real reasons Tony Blair wanted them in Britain.

And once the floodgates were opened, it became supremely important not to turn anybody away. Of the 2 million visas issued every year, fifteen percent of them were “processed” when they should not have been in order to hit “productivity targets,” with immigration officials placed under intense political pressure to issue visas rather than reject them.

One man who took advantage of Blair’s treachery was Abu Baseer, the spiritual advisor to Ansar ul-Islam, a jihadist organisation linked to Al Qaeda. Baseer was originally based in Iraq prior to settling in West London, from where he issues various fatwas calling for death to British soldiers and the overthrow of the West. He had this to say on the subject of immigration:

“One of the goals of immigration is the revival of the duty of jihad and enforcement of power over the infidels. Immigration and jihad go together. One is the consequence of the other and dependent upon it. The continuance of the one is dependent upon the continuance of the other.”

The next stage in Labour’s war against Britain and its indigenous people was to make sure the foreign colonisers maintained their 7th century ideology and customs through a curious yet highly effective liberal process called “multiculturalism.” This guaranteed their non-assimilation and thus provided Tony Blair and his friends with a hostile and ever-growing tool with which to incrementally erode traditional Britain.

Despite the obvious violence that emanates from massed Muslims wherever they are in the world, the Labour government went to great lengths to portray Islam as The Religion of Peace, even as Christianity was mocked and defiled, and decent, moral and patriotic Britons were re-cast and criminalised as Islamophobic, race-hating Nazis.

Not even our children were safe from Tony Blair’s thought police. The propaganda arms of the BBC and the state educational service tried to convince our children that their race, culture, religion and history consisted only of genocide, racism and evil. The spectre of Adolf Hitler was also constantly invoked with the quite deliberate intention of linking any resistance to the religious and ethnic colonisation of Britain with the actions and ideology of the Nazis.

And while third-world immigration continued apace, the Labour Party lied to cover up the attendant serial catastrophes. We were told that they were peaceful, that they committed little crime and that they were a benefit to the economy. None of this was true, as detailed by the exposure of Labours’ various lies and distortions, which showed a negative cost to the economy and a disproportionate level of crime including rape and murder — and of course, terrorism.

Nine out of ten new jobs were taken by immigrants, along with eighty-five percent of new housing. Muslims are grossly over-represented within Britain’s jails and within Britain’s welfare state, which supports fifty percent of Muslim males and seventy-five percent of females who reproduce like belt-fed mortars rather than going out to work.

To further bolster the Muslim demographics, Britain’s laws against polygamy were overlooked in the case of Islam. Muslim males could thus legally amass four imported wives, twenty to thirty children and a large house (or houses) in which to raise them, all paid for by the Labour state — right down to the satellite dish tuned into the various sources of jihad beamed direct from the East.

Only two out of three babies born in Britain today are classified as white British. Twenty percent of mothers are first generation immigrants, and a further twenty-five percent second or third generation immigrants. The idea that there are only 2.4 million Muslims in Britain is therefore ridiculous. There is strong evidence to suggest the numbers could be somewhere between 5-10 million.

The welfare-funded Muslim birth-rate has already rendered English children a minority in many city schools. In London, white school children now enter their first year as an ethnic minority. Figures from the Office of National Statistics suggest that British people of all ages will become a minority by 2066 with the young becoming a minority far earlier, and the young English earlier still.

These apocalyptic figures led Professor David Coleman of Oxford University to state that the transition of white Britons to a minority was likely to be: “unwelcome… and would represent an enormous change to national identity — cultural, political, economic and religious”.

Professor Coleman is quite right, but what is scarcely believable is that these enormous changes were precisely what the Labour Party had in mind in 1997. This was made apparent when Peter Hitchens recounted his dismay regarding a fellow hack who jumped ship in order to work for the Labour Party:

“I asked him why he had done this awful thing. He replied: you have no idea at all just how enormous the New Labour Project really is.”

Other people were all too aware of the size and direction of the Labour Party juggernaut, but still managed to hold onto their naivet√© as to its ultimate destination, which appears to be the cultural and racial eradication of the English people. This genocidal policy was explained by Tony Blair’s speech-writer Andrew Neather in 2010, when he rather foolishly came out with the following treasonous nuggets:

‘It didn’t just happen: the deliberate policy of ministers from late 2000 until at least February last year was to open up the UK to mass migration… to make the UK truly multicultural…the policy was intended to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date… this shone through even in the published report: the “social outcomes” it talks about are solely those for immigrants’

There were two main reasons for such treachery. The first was held by Labour’s minority hard-left who wanted to destroy utterly the hated traditional establishment, and in this respect they had no choice but to declare war on their own people. To the hard-left, the enemy was the conservative, Christian, capitalist West of liberal-democracy Western civilisation — or, in other words, the majority of the English.

The second reason, held perhaps by the majority of Labour apparatchiks, was to ensure a socialist government in perpetuity via the imported foreign vote. Research into voting patterns conducted for The Electoral Commission in May 2005 showed that Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshis voted 56%, 50% and 41% for Labour. The equivalent figures for the Conservatives were 11%, 11% and 9%

The Labour Party has form with this kind of gerrymandering. Ex-Communist Peter Mandelson’s grandfather, Herbert Morrison, who was Labour’s Deputy Prime Minister between 1945-1951, came up with the novel idea of constructing soviet-style concrete tower-blocks for the working-class to live in who would subsequently vote Labour and thus “build the f*****g Tories (Conservatives) out of London.”

Tony Blair simply took it a stage further, and imported a “vigorously encouraged to feel oppressed class” from foreign climes to serve as cultural destroyers / Labour bloc-voters. This is a subtle re-working of Bertolt Brecht’s comment in the wake of East Berlin’s 1953 bread riots, when he suggested: “Wouldn’t it be simpler for the government to dissolve the people and elect another?”

Who would have thought this would one day apply to “democratic” Britain where the indigenous people are not so much being dissolved as replaced, and where “population replacement” is simply a more refined way of saying ethnic cleansing?

It was James Burnham who first coined the phrase “Suicide of the West”, but this is not a majority-ordained suicide. It is a minority-controlled murderous genocide. Let me be very clear about this: Tony Blair and the Labour Party declared war on their own people, and there is (as yet) no substantive reason to believe we can survive this century, let alone the long term.

The point of war is not about fighting and shooting and storming and gung-hoing; it is about gaining physical territory and taking political control of the defeated territory and its people. This is exactly what is slowly but surely happening to the English.

And because it is happening so slowly, many people are unaware of the situation. If a man is injected with a fast acting poison and dies minutes later, he has clearly been murdered. But is it not still murder if the poison were slow acting and allowed the man to live another twenty years?

It is the act of injection, knowing the consequences, which makes it murder, and Tony Blair injected Britain with a lethal cocktail of fast-breeding inassimilable aliens in the full and calculated knowledge that the country and its indigenous people would be incrementally destroyed as a result.

We can see this destruction today. Vulnerable girls in Northern towns were groomed and raped by Pakistanis for over eight years without any recrimination. The police simply pretended nothing untoward was happening. Much the same happened in Berlin in the mid 1930s to the Jews, who suffered tremendous persecution that was subsequently ignored by the authorities.

In London, entire areas are slowly coming under Islamic control. Tower Hamlets is now lost to the West as Jews, women and homosexuals are persecuted whilst English street names and the few remaining whites are systematically replaced. Soon to be lost, if indeed they are not already lost are Luton, Bradford, Oldham, Birmingham, Leicester, etc. Fjordman calls this Beheading Nations and asks the following question:

“Less attention has been paid to the fact that Muslims are beheading entire nation states. Although this is happening in slow motion, it is no less dramatic. Historically, the major cities have constituted a country’s ‘head’ the seat of most of its political institutions and the largest concentration of its cultural brainpower. What happens when this “head” is cut off from the rest of the body?”

When our racial / religious society cedes territory to a rival society, then we are losing a battle. When the state enacts laws to reward the aggressive incomer and to penalise the passive native, then we are losing a battle. When our children are brainwashed into the belief that they are evil and worthy only of displacement, then we are losing a battle. When our women and children are raped and abused whilst the state remains silent, then we are losing a battle.

And when finally we become too defeated even to breed whilst we pay the aggressor to demographically swamp us, then we have not just lost a battle, we are in the midst of losing a war, our homeland, and our civilisation. We are rapidly on our way to extinction.

We have been betrayed. Tony Blair and the Labour Party have committed treason. The British people were never asked if they wished Muslim immigrants to colonise Britain in such large numbers that it constituted invasion. Had they been asked they would have replied with a resounding No!

Although lawyers may argue over the precise meaning of the word “treason”, everyone else understands it only too well, including Tony Blair, which (along with the EU sell-out) is presumably why he repealed the treason laws. The Labour government was elected to represent the best interests of the British people, not those of Mirpur.

It does not really matter whether the third world was imported for revolutionary or electoral gain. All that matters is that Tony Blair’s Labour Party systematically allied itself with the massed imported ideologues of the Western world’s most persistent historical aggressor, and actively sided against Britain and the British people.

Rather than sign off with a furious tirade about the severe recrimination traitors should endure, I will leave you instead with a calm yet deeply poignant quote from Alex Henshaw, chief test-pilot for Vickers Armstrong during the Second World War. Despite test-flying ten percent of all Spitfires during their development stage, Mr Henshaw survived the war and lived a long life before dying in 2007:

“I feel extreme emotional sadness for the young men I knew that gave their lives willingly for a cause in which we all believed. And I often say to myself now if those young boys would come down now and walk through the villages, through the towns and through the cities and look around and see what is happening to us, they would say somewhere along the line we have been betrayed.”

Yes, Mr Henshaw. I am afraid you have.




Previous posts by Paul Weston:

2007Jan22The Week Britain Died
26Britain’s Dystopian School Children
Feb2Questioning the Sanity of Liberals
Mar1Multiculturalism — Merits and Debits
31Is European Civil War Inevitable by 2025?
Jun26The Big Story That Isn’t
Aug10An Open Letter to Fellow Europeans
24A Brussels Perspective
Sep12Democratic Europe R.I.P.
Nov2The Coming Third World War
21Cool War — Warm War — Hot War: Part 1
29Cool War — Warm War — Hot War: Part 2
2008Mar27The Face of Moderate Islam in Britain
2009Feb9Wilders in Wonderland
13Who is Lord Ahmed?
25Temporary Peace Trumps Freedom of Speech
Jul1Muslims, Mosques and Mosquitoes
2Islam, the BBC, and Young Children
8Review of “A Bridge Too Far”
17Socialist Propaganda in British Education
Oct15Multiculturalism Has Destroyed the British Police
2010Mar16Ethnically Cleansing the English
Oct7Banana Republic Britain
30“We Will Hold You to Account”
Dec5The Metaphorical Front Line of Islam
5The West Needs to Wake Up
7Land for Peace — Or Land for a Terror State?
behavior of the Labour government and their ..."